Re: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.0.0 Released

Heartiest of congratulations DBMail 2.0.0 ROCKS! Thanks to all ... Mike - Original Message - From: "Ilja Booij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist" Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:06 AM Subject: [Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.0.0 Released > After a long time of ha

Re: [Dbmail-dev] changes 1.2 -> 2.0

IMAP in 2.0 supports shared folders

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: changes 1.2 -> 2.0

I think you also forgot performance enhancements. The physmessages table makes a big difference. Ilja Booij wrote: On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:37:07 +0200, Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm compiling a list of changes from 1.2 to 2.0 the release of 2.0. Am I omitting anything impo

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Releasing 2.0?

Aaron Stone wrote: Depends how instantaneous we expect the changes to be. Would requiring a HUP be too much? Perhaps, because if we were on the box to give a HUP then we'd just copy the file anyways. However, if changes take five minutes to propagate, a fatal config error would be fatal for that

[Dbmail-dev] DBMail 2.0.0 Released

After a long time of hacking, adding features, breaking and fixing things and too many release candidates, DBMail 2.0.0 is finally out! Many thanks go to our dedicated developers, especially Aaron Stone and Paul J Stevens, but also to everyone else who has contributed through patches, bug reports,

[Dbmail-dev] Re: changes 1.2 -> 2.0

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:37:07 +0200, Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm compiling a list of changes from 1.2 to 2.0 the release of 2.0. Am > I omitting anything important: > I had forgotten these: executables are now in /usr/local/sbin man pages are now in section 8, except for

[Dbmail-dev] changes 1.2 -> 2.0

Hi, I'm compiling a list of changes from 1.2 to 2.0 the release of 2.0. Am I omitting anything important: Changes from 1.2.x to 2.0: New features: * LMTP (Local Mail Transport Protocol) daemon: Messages can enter the DBMail system via LMTP. The major difference between using dbmail-smt

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000096]: Malformed headers in Outlook Express

The following bug has been RESOLVED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=096 == Reported By:dstilts Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000097]: RECENT flag always set

The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=097 == Reported By:alessandro Assigned

Re: [Dbmail-dev] acinclude.m4 contains garbage

Gerrit, I use automake1.4 on my devel machine. The debian automake maintainer warns about using later automake packages because of possible compatibility problems. That's why I was using the oldest version available. I'm perfectly willing to switch to 1.9, but there may be some reasons not to

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Releasing 2.0?

Dan Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [snip] ... >> we still have to find a >> way of having the daemons use the changed config (and at not bombard >> the server holding the config with a gazillion of queries every >> second). >> > Caching -- check every 600 seconds and that will allow a small grace

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Releasing 2.0?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:59:04AM +0200, Ilja Booij wrote: > > 2) More importantly however, there is discussion about moving major parts > > of the > > configuration back into the config table in the/a database. Personally I > > think > > that this is even whackier than xml for many reasons. The

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] Malformed headers in Outlook Express

Paul J Stevens wrote: Dan Stilts wrote: Thanks Paul! Let me know if you would like me to test at some point. Dan, please try again. I think I have it nailed down this time. My tests don't show your problem anymore. Hey Paul, Everything looks like it is working perfectly! Everything