Re: [Dbmail-dev] header storage schema changes. (W)Here we (may) go.

2005-01-04 Thread Jesse Norell
From: Paul J Stevens dbmail-dev@dbmail.org snip What I like about the yukatan approach is that it tries to make searches on very common headers as cheap and fast as possible. It does this by going one step beyond separate header storage: preparse certain headers for common attributes:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] header storage schema changes. (W)Here we (may) go.

2005-01-04 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Jesse Norell wrote: Isn't this exactly what the header/message cache will do, as well? With a nice, generic setup, I had hoped to do exactly that - cache the In-Reply-To and References headers to enable quick/easy message threading in weDBmail. I guess I was just wondering if this whole thread

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000145]: LMTP loses return-path

2005-01-04 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=145 == Reported By:bjohnson Assigned

[Dbmail-dev] Re: missing return-path

2005-01-04 Thread Bernard Johnson
Entered into the tracker as #145. I also included enough logging to hopefully show that it is happening. Please excuse the semi-sanitized files (for privacy reasons). Bernard Paul J Stevens wrote: Bernard, Could you please report this issue on the bugtracker on www.dbmail.org. Please

[Dbmail-dev] read_whole_message_(pipe/network)

2005-01-04 Thread Paul J Stevens
Aaron, I'm working toward a unified implementation for both functions. But what I don't understand is the reason for splitting them up in the first place. Ok, so _network does more checking on the state of the instream, but other than that...?? Ownership of the stream I'm guessing? --

Re: [Dbmail-dev] read_whole_message_(pipe/network)

2005-01-04 Thread Ilja Booij
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:38:14 +0100, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron, I'm working toward a unified implementation for both functions. But what I don't understand is the reason for splitting them up in the first place. Ok, so _network does more checking on the state of the

Re: [Dbmail-dev] read_whole_message_(pipe/network)

2005-01-04 Thread Aaron Stone
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working toward a unified implementation for both functions. But what I don't understand is the reason for splitting them up in the first place. Ok, so _network does more checking on the state of the instream, but

Re: [Dbmail-dev] read_whole_message_(pipe/network)

2005-01-04 Thread Paul J Stevens
Mmm. Should stdin injection support more than one message at a time? Can I rely on eof? From reading the relevant parts of gmime I've come to suspect gmime will read until eof unless the parser is satisfied a complete message has been read (due to mime-part parsing, i.e boundary detection).