So I know this comes up now and then.
I was hoping to peak some new interest in using GUID's in
place of the incrementing unique_id's in the current code
base.
This would be the key to non-colliding id's for a
loadbalanced/failover system on a master-master mysql.
If this doesn't fit into the cu
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=197
==
Reported By:qwer
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=197
==
Reported By:qwer
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=197
==
Reported By:qwer
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=197
==
Reported By:qwer
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=177
==
Reported By:mobrien
Assigned To
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=177
==
Reported By:mobrien
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=154
==
Reported By:xing
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=197
==
Reported By:qwer
Assigned To:
Kevin Baker wrote:
I was hoping to peak some new interest in using GUID's in
place of the incrementing unique_id's in the current code
base.
This would be the key to non-colliding id's for a
loadbalanced/failover system on a master-master mysql.
Since GUIDs can be generated by the application
Very True...
We discussed the GUID's being generated based on sync'ed
datetime stamp with a unique ID per server. (NTP required)
My primary interest now is to create simple 2 machine
clusters for each user segment. Each of the machines in
the cluster would use guid's for unique_id values.
Each c
I'm thinking about allowing database drivers to abstract away any
function in db.c (or anything else that "generates" SQL).
It was brought up before for some postgresql-specific things or mysql-
specific things, but it seems to me that it could be used for a SQL-free
database interface like metak
I'm thinking about allowing database drivers to abstract away any
function in db.c (or anything else that "generates" SQL).
Any thoughts on those abstractions?
Ever considered making a Reiser4 plugin for DBMail?
IMHO, something like this would really shake it all.
13 matches
Mail list logo