Uwe Kiewel wrote:
> Larry Low schrieb:
> > Paul J Stevens schrieb:
> >> Uwe Kiewel wrote:
> >>> Jonathan Feally schrieb:
> >>>> Thats ugly. I am having no issues on my FreeBSD box. Just run a
> fresh
> >>>> clone a few minutes ago. I&
re using CentOS. I
used gmime 2.2.23 and glib2 2.20.3.
I got the dbmail git compiled but I am having problems with messages being
stored correctly. Trying to compile more information to troubleshoot.
---
Larry Low
___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Is PostgreSQL >= 8.2 going to be required for dbmail 2.3/2.4? I notice the use
of "RETURNING" keyword in INSERT statements for instance.
---
Larry Low
480.385.7045 (w) | l...@telesphere.com | www.telesphere.com
9237 E Via de Ventura | Suite 250 | Scottsd
abase running on a non-standard port.
#
sqlport =
#
# When using a local socket connection to the database, fill
# in the path to the socket here (e.g. /var/run/mysql.sock).
#
sqlsocket= /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432
---
Larry Low
___
Dbmai
>
> Yes, but starting with Glib 2.14:
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/ix09.html
>
> Aaron
>
Thanks. INSTALL file needs to be updated with this as it indicates 2.8.
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008, Larry Low <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Is
look into it more.
> Larry Low wrote:
> > Do you consider the database schema pretty much set in stone?
>
> Pretty much, sure. No plans to change them on this end.
>
> > I'm considering beginning testing in my lab and looking forward to
> testing if the expunging ha
Do you consider the database schema pretty much set in stone? I'm considering
beginning testing in my lab and looking forward to testing if the expunging has
been improved.
>
> Hi all,
>
> It is with great pleasure that I'm announcing the availability of
> DBMail
> version 2.3.4, the latest in
