I take the point of view that Linked Data are claims, rather than facts.
Claims are made by different people/datasources, possibly conflicting, and
the consumer decides what/who to believe. I think that both dbpedia.org and
live.dbpedia.org should provide claims about the same URIs, without
I like this solution. Especially if a request to
http://live.dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing} returns triples about
http://dbpedia.org/{http://live.dbpedia.org/%7Bresource%7Cpage%7D/%7BThing%7D
resource|page}/{Thing}http://live.dbpedia.org/%7Bresource%7Cpage%7D/%7BThing%7D
Cheers,
Pablo
On
I take the point of view that Linked Data are claims, rather than
facts.
They are assertions. IIRC the terminology was a bit like:
statement: 'The moon is made of cheese'
assertion (... I now make a claim about the world, for example by
publishing a respective RDF triple ...): 'The
