Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-15 Thread Peter F. Patel-Schneider
On 07/15/2017 12:09 AM, Jeff Thompson wrote: >> It is always possible to replace classes by properties. > > The mechanism in an ontology for filtering out nonsense is disjointness and > you need classes for disjointness. For example, the ontology should entail > that the City class and Government

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-14 Thread Peter F. Patel-Schneider
On 07/06/2017 11:56 AM, Sebastian Samaruga wrote: > Question: isn't it possible to 'aggregate' classes of subjects in respect to > the properties / predicates some set of subjects have in common. Example: a > Person class subjects would have 'birthPlace', 'birthDate' and 'name' > properties and a

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-14 Thread Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Where is the parallel cleanup of the ontology happening? peter On 07/05/2017 08:58 AM, Sebastian Hellmann wrote: > Hi John, > > > On 05.07.2017 17:43, John Flynn wrote: >> >> I have long been curious about the DBpedia ontology structure so I just took >> a look at the ontology represented in >>

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-12 Thread Markus Freudenberg
Adding to Ricardos two cent: My opinion always was to leave the current ontology and its development as is, while exploring the possibility to extract against a second (upper?) ontology as well. Basically creating two datasets. Best, Markus Freudenberg Release Manager, DBpedia

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-12 Thread Ricardo Usbeck
Hi all, thanks for the interesting discussion about the (re-)modelling of the ontology. Also the idea of Oliver is very interesting in terms of decoupling. My two cents are: First, many applications and approaches are written so they work with what is present now. If you change too much in how

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-10 Thread jaccoud
ulated it correctly.) -- Original Message -- From: jacc...@petrobras.com.br To: "Sebastian Samaruga" Cc: "DBpedia" ; "Sebastian Hellmann" ; "John Flynn" < jflyn...@verizon.net>; "Paul Houle" Sent: 7/7/2017 2:11:05 PM Subject: R

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-10 Thread Paul Houle
.br To: "Sebastian Samaruga" Cc: "DBpedia" ; "Sebastian Hellmann" ; "John Flynn" ; "Paul Houle" Sent: 7/7/2017 2:11:05 PM Subject: Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia Yes, it is possible to define classes solely on

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-07 Thread Sebastian Samaruga
> -- Horatius > > > > > > De: Sebastian Samaruga > Para: jacc...@petrobras.com.br > Cc:Paul Houle , public-lod < > public-...@w3.org>, John Flynn , Sebastian Hellmann > , DBpedia sourceforge.net>, semantic-web at W3C > Data:

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-07 Thread jaccoud
maruga Para: jacc...@petrobras.com.br Cc: Paul Houle , public-lod , John Flynn , Sebastian Hellmann , DBpedia , semantic-web at W3C Data: 2017-07-06 15:56 Assunto: Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia Question: isn't it possible to '

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-07 Thread jaccoud
.fu-berlin.de Cc: Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net Data: 2017-07-06 16:08 Assunto: Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia Question: isn't it possible to 'aggregate' classes of subjects in respect to the properties / predicates some s

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-06 Thread Kingsley Idehen
ed by a large organization". > > > > -- Original Message -- > From: "John Flynn" mailto:jflyn...@verizon.net>> > To: "'Sebastian Hellmann'" <mailto:hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>>; "'semantic-web at W3C'&quo

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-06 Thread Sebastian Samaruga
;> = >> Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral >> Petrobras, Brazil >> = >> >> >> >> >> >> De:"Paul Houle" >> Para: "John Flynn" , "

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-06 Thread jaccoud
rcelo Jaccoud Amaral Petrobras, Brazil = De: "Paul Houle" Para: "John Flynn" , "'Sebastian Hellmann'" , "'semantic-web at W3C'" , 'public-lod' , 'DBpedia' Data: 2

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-06 Thread Paul Houle
oning over data collected by a large organization". -- Original Message -- From: "John Flynn" To: "'Sebastian Hellmann'" ; "'semantic-web at W3C'" ; "'public-lod'" ; "'DBpedia'" Sent: 7/5/2017 11:43:02 AM

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-05 Thread Sebastian Hellmann
Hi again, On 05.07.2017 17:58, Sebastian Hellmann wrote: On 05.07.2017 17:43, John Flynn wrote: I have long been curious about the DBpedia ontology structure so I just took a look at the ontology represented in (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/375401/dbo_no_mappings.nt) as referenced i

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-05 Thread Sebastian Hellmann
http://semanticsimulations.com *From:*Sebastian Hellmann [mailto:hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de] *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:43 AM *To:* 'semantic-web at W3C'; public-lod; DBpedia *Subject:* [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia Dear all, we

Re: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-05 Thread John Flynn
ently structured. John Flynn http://semanticsimulations.com From: Sebastian Hellmann [mailto:hellm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 10:43 AM To: 'semantic-web at W3C'; public-lod; DBpedia Subject: [DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for

[DBpedia-discussion] Call for Ontology Editor demos for DBpedia

2017-07-05 Thread Sebastian Hellmann
Dear all, we are preparing a switch from the mappings wiki (http://mappings.dbpedia.org) to another ontology editor and started to collect requirements/tools here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HwtJJ3jIlrQAPwHYhvpw4a4Z4hZorTGaZTB8Bq8Y-TI/edit We already have a demo for Webprotege thank