I agree with Aaron and this the reason we started this effort. Even a small
improvement in quality through the ontology could have a big impact.
Improving the ontology should be an iterative process that will take into
account both the data and the mappings. However, some decisions/actions can
be m
The one thing I would say is that while I agree in general...the one thing that
keeps eating away at me is that there is tremendous potential in dbpedia for
bigger questions to be answered, but the more advanced analytics require that
some level of sanity exists within the ontology...much more s
Hi John,
My thoughts are for DBpedia to stay close to the mission of extracting
quality data from Wikipedia, and no more. That quality extraction is an
essential grease to the linked data ecosystem, and of much major benefit
to anyone needful of broadly useful structured data.
I think both Wik
John,
You make a good point...but are we talking about a complete tear-down of the
existing ontology? I'm not necessarily opposed to that notion, by want to make
sure that we are all in agreement as to the scope of work, as it were.
What would be the implications of a complete redo? Would the
Vladimir,
I'm thinking of trying to do some stats on the existing ontology and the
mappings to see where there is room for improvement. I'm tied up this week
with a couple deadlines that I seem to moving towards at greater than light
speed, though my progress is not.
As soon as I get the roug
> From: M. Aaron Bossert [mailto:maboss...@gmail.com]
> I am more than happy to work the ML problem with you.
Hi Aaron!
Would be great to work with someone from Cray but I don't have a good idea how
to use ML here,
nor indeed a lot of trust in using ML to produce or fix mappings.
E.g. see this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I agree that there are problems with the mappings. However, how can the
mappings be fixed without fixing the ontology?
peter
On 02/18/2015 05:03 AM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> My presentations from the Dublin meeting are at
>
> -
Vladimir,
I am more than happy to work the ML problem with you. For your example of the
dichotomy with the domain and range of "mother" and queen Victoria being the
"mother", this begs for contextual approach to that concept
Aaron
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 08:03, Vladimir Alexiev
> wrote:
>
