Hi,
the discussion has touched on lots of things related to UDP encaps, but I
haven't seen anything I'd call consensus on the question below. I'd therefore
like to ask folks to specifically state which option they support:
(1) do one SCTP-specific and one DCCP-specific UDP encaps
(2) do one gen
On 5/18/10 12:37 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
the discussion has touched on lots of things related to UDP encaps, but I
haven't seen anything I'd call consensus on the question below. I'd therefore
like to ask folks to specifically state which option they support:
(1) do one SCTP-specific and o
Hi Andrew,
> It would be even better if you could implement DCCP with UDP encap
with
> the baseline UDP networking facilities of Java. A whole bunch of
> Android developers would grab that.
Oh, that's interesting. Maybe if I can find some time I'll look at
porting dccp-tp to Android.
Tom P.
>
Hi Lars,
Well, I like option 1.
I feel that option 2 is a chimera. The 'G' in the GUT proposal stands
for "generic", but it is not entirely generic. The decapsulation stage
is specific to the encapsulated protocol. The GUT draft gives one decap
rule that is more-or-less suitable for TCP and DC
On May 18, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the discussion has touched on lots of things related to UDP encaps, but I
> haven't seen anything I'd call consensus on the question below. I'd therefore
> like to ask folks to specifically state which option they support:
>
> (1) do on
3. neither
(a solution for 2. already exists. It's called UDP tunnelling.)
On 18 May 2010, at 08:37, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the discussion has touched on lots of things related to UDP encaps, but I
> haven't seen anything I'd call consensus on the question below. I'd therefore
> like to
