Re: Seastones

2002-01-28 Thread Jim Powell
that's certainly my understanding -- 11/28/73.

Re: Seastones

2002-01-28 Thread Ihor W Slabicky
> There is a Mickey Hart board of this Palace of Fine Arts,SF. > show "Garcia, Hart & lesh." The date on that tape is 4-15-73. the correct date should be 11-28-73? I-) ihor

"Seastones"

2002-01-26 Thread Katherine Martin
There is a Mickey Hart board of this Palace of Fine Arts,SF. show "Garcia, Hart & lesh." The date on that tape is 4-15-73. Steven Martin

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread Michael Getz
on 1/19/02 5:21 PM, Jim Powell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > cool. my copy came from Doug Wolfish years ago, before he started going by > the other name, so that will certainly be an improvement. Another spacefest I'd like to see mastered is the musical segment from the Joseph Campbell symposiu

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread Jim Powell
cool. my copy came from Doug Wolfish years ago, before he started going by the other name, so that will certainly be an improvement.

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread Michael Getz
on 1/19/02 8:52 AM, David Gans at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 4:29 PM -0800 1/18/02, Jim Powell wrote: >> actually, finny has that backward. It's Ihor who thought 11/28/73 was a >> compilation. I'm pretty certain it's for real. I think I ended up >> convincing Ihor, but it's been awhile. th

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread David Gans
At 10:42 AM -0800 1/19/02, Jim Powell wrote: >by the way, Palace Of Fine Arts, SF 11/28/73 shouldn't really be referred to >as Seastones. I think it was billed as Garcia & Hart, and Phil mixes and >may have added electronics. But I don't believe Lagin participates, t

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread Jim Powell
by the way, Palace Of Fine Arts, SF 11/28/73 shouldn't really be referred to as Seastones. I think it was billed as Garcia & Hart, and Phil mixes and may have added electronics. But I don't believe Lagin participates, though I could be wrong -- hard to tell who emits what electron

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread Jim Powell
I think I have the best copy of 11/28/73, at least as far as I've heard -- it was cleaner & more complete than Ihors, if I remember correctly. I should really try to dig up my notes on this. Ihor? What can you add to this discussion?

Re: Seastones

2002-01-19 Thread David Gans
At 4:29 PM -0800 1/18/02, Jim Powell wrote: >actually, finny has that backward. It's Ihor who thought 11/28/73 was a >compilation. I'm pretty certain it's for real. I think I ended up >convincing Ihor, but it's been awhile. that's a great tape. it ought to be >mastered to CDs. Who has the be

Re: Seastones

2002-01-18 Thread Jim Powell
actually, finny has that backward. It's Ihor who thought 11/28/73 was a compilation. I'm pretty certain it's for real. I think I ended up convincing Ihor, but it's been awhile. that's a great tape. it ought to be mastered to CDs.

Re: Seastones

2002-01-18 Thread David Gans
At 2:13 PM -0800 1/18/02, Dan Sisler wrote: >--- "David A. Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Today, someone on r.m.gd posted a copy of a message that I posted to this >> list on 12 Nov 1999. At that time, Jim Powell felt that a copy of >> Seastones fro

Re: Seastones

2002-01-18 Thread Dan Sisler
--- "David A. Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today, someone on r.m.gd posted a copy of a message that I posted to this > list on 12 Nov 1999. At that time, Jim Powell felt that a copy of > Seastones from 11.28.73 (Palace of Fine Arts, on 3 CDs ) that Ihor > Sla

Seastones

2002-01-18 Thread David A. Finney
Today, someone on r.m.gd posted a copy of a message that I posted to this list on 12 Nov 1999. At that time, Jim Powell felt that a copy of Seastones from 11.28.73 (Palace of Fine Arts, on 3 CDs ) that Ihor Slabicky and I had put together was a "bogus compilation" from more than one p