RE: connectors between songs conventions

2002-06-21 Thread Kevin Weil
an > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:54 AM > To: Paul Sexton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: connectors between songs conventions > > > We do have a variety of symbols. They are: > > ; Songs not continuing into each other (or whose transition has not > been examin

Re: connectors between songs conventions

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Gibian
EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:34 PM Subject: connectors between songs conventions > Some time ago there was some discussion about the possibility of making more > sophisticated the usage of connectors between songs to better indicate what > actually occured. It seems that

Re: connectors between songs conventions

2002-06-21 Thread David Gans
At 8:34 PM -0500 6/20/02, Paul Sexton wrote: >Some time ago there was some discussion about the possibility of making more >sophisticated the usage of connectors between songs to better indicate what >actually occured. It seems that a ">" to indicate everything from a shorter >than usual pause to

Re: connectors between songs conventions

2002-06-21 Thread Gordon Sharpless
It's a nice thought, but as it requires someone to sit down and analyze every show, the likelihood of this happening with any degree of accuracy or consistency is rather remote, I'd say. Gordon At 08:34 PM 6/20/02 -0500, you wrote: >Some time ago there was some discussion about the possibility

connectors between songs conventions

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Sexton
Some time ago there was some discussion about the possibility of making more sophisticated the usage of connectors between songs to better indicate what actually occured. It seems that a ">" to indicate everything from a shorter than usual pause to true musical continuity is inadequate. Although