("Solver"
, init(args("model")))
boost::copyable:
also it looks like there
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1930610/operator-in-boostpython> is
possibility to overload asignment operator, but I didn't tryied it and it
looks tricky.
Best,
Oleg Kmechak
On Monday, 1
~
make[2]: *** [source/CMakeFiles/riversimPY.dir/build.make:63:
source/CMakeFiles/riversimPY.dir/pythonapi.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:234:
source/CMakeFiles/riversimPY.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:141: all] Error 2
Best,
Oleg Kmechak
--
The deal.II project is locat
UPD: Looks like bug, AFAIK paraview has some strange visualization
of quadrangle if their nodes are not on same surface, but I tried some
processing of results: contour plot and it is discontinuous:
[image: contour_bug.png]
Best,
Oleg
--
The deal.II project is located at
Thank You for answer!
With best,
Oleg
On Wednesday, 11 December 2019 15:56:35 UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> On 12/10/19 7:16 PM, Oleg Kmechak wrote:
> > Can You describe please, why algebraic multigrid algorithm may be better
> in
> > this situation? Is it somehow
. In that case, you will need to use MPI. Take a look at step-40
> <https://dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/step_40.html#LaplaceProblemsolve>
> It solves the Laplace equation with 52 millions DoFs in less than 10
> seconds on 4000 processors.
>
> Best
>
> Bruno
>
Thank You clarification
On Friday, 6 December 2019 14:48:24 UTC+1, Bruno Turcksin wrote:
>
> Oleg,
>
> Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 à 08:21, Oleg Kmechak > a écrit :
> > So I still have to use MPI to make program multihread, even if it is a
> single machine, with 40 proce
> The first thing to do if you want to speed up you code is to profile your
> code. How do you know which part of the code is slow?
>
Thank you for this advice, it is a good point to look forward.
Till this moment I was looking on console log to understand perfomance.
> In that case, you
PS: In a moment I checked documentation for write_vtk. And there is
suggestion to use VTU, so I will try to check also this case.
Regards,
Oleg
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 17:14, Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 4/30/19 9:06 AM, ofcrashb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Yes those "triangles" mesh are what I
Yes, it looked like not enough precision of numbers and thats why it
quantisizing mesh to grid.
I am using VTK and standard workflow from step-6:
DataOut data_out;
data_out.attach_dof_handler(dof_handler);
data_out.add_data_vector(solution, "solution");
data_out.build_patches();
std::ofstream
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Oleg Kmechak
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 01:13, Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 12/6/18 4:43 PM, Oleg Kmechak wrote:
> >
> > Probably I understood how to set Dirichlet boundary condition using
> > interpolate_boundary_values() and specifying
tion f(x,y)? It is done somehow by FEValue class?
Regards,
Oleg Kmechak
On Wednesday, 28 November 2018 05:45:41 UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> On 11/27/18 6:56 PM, Oleg Kmechak wrote:
> >
> > But you can't set boundary indicators on faces
> > tha
With regards,
Oleg Kmechak
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsub
nd hdf5 from tar file from offitial
websites(not sure about deatails of building it was some time ago).
With regards,
Oleg Kmechak
On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 03:10:41 UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
>
> Oleg,
> I have not seen this error before. In your build directory, can you
DEAL.II
throws that it can procced cos ADOL-C uses boost. But it isn't problem for
me, jus FYI.
With regards,
Oleg Kmechak
On Tuesday, 9 October 2018 05:33:21 UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
>
> If you build boost externally then you could point ADOL-C to it (
> --with-b
Hello,
DealII was configured with cxx 14, 17, cos previous build without cxx 17
flag was ok(but there was also another build of p4est).
p4est was configured with next options --enable-mpi --enable-shared
--disable-vtk-binary --without-blas. These options are recommended here.
set up wit flag
--without-boost
With regards,
Oleg Kmechak
On Monday, 8 October 2018 14:26:13 UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
>
> Dear Oleg,
>
> Please see this recently closed issue on our GitHub repository:
> https://github.com/dealii/dealii/issues/7293
>
> There have been
2.6.3.
Regards,
Oleg Kmechak
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"deal.II User Group&q
17 matches
Mail list logo
