David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava escribió:
>>> FWIW, I also have no objection in scheduling *also* the global party,
>>> people not interested can simply avoid to opt-in.
>> I have no objection either, as long as there is a list of people
>> attending.
>
> That'd be, actually,
On Wed, 9 May 2007 02:40:26 +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Am Tuesday, den 8 May hub Manoj Srivastava folgendes in die Tasten:
> Hi!
>> No, that's not actually right. Even the little keysigning parties
>> are going to be using the big list -- so there is no way to separat
On Tue, 8 May 2007 22:04:41 -0500, David Moreno Garza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava escribió:
>> I want to know the names of people who go to the two hour party, so I
>> can discount their sigs.
> Why's that exactly? I think I'm not getting the point.
As madduck demonstr
Manoj Srivastava escribió:
> I want to know the names of people who go to the two hour party,
> so I can discount their sigs.
Why's that exactly? I think I'm not getting the point.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
STAND BACK! I know regular expressions.
On Tue, 8 May 2007 18:44:59 -0600, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:22:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I want to know the names of people who go to the two hour party, so I
>> can discount their sigs.
> I suggest you attend the two hour party then. You c
Am Tuesday, den 8 May hub Manoj Srivastava folgendes in die Tasten:
Hi!
> No, that's not actually right. Even the little keysigning
> parties are going to be using the big list -- so there is no way to
> separate those who went to the big party from the rest of us. Just
> because a
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:22:30PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I want to know the names of people who go to the two hour party,
> so I can discount their sigs.
I suggest you attend the two hour party then. You can wait in line and
people will even introduce themselves to you so that
On Tue, 8 May 2007 19:07:11 -0500, David Moreno Garza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava escribió:
>> > FWIW, I also have no objection in scheduling *also* the global
>> > party, people not interested can simply avoid to opt-in.
>>
>> I have no objection either, as long as there is a
Manoj Srivastava escribió:
> > FWIW, I also have no objection in scheduling *also* the global party,
> > people not interested can simply avoid to opt-in.
>
> I have no objection either, as long as there is a list of people
> attending.
That'd be, actually, the usual keyring list that ha
On Wed, 9 May 2007 01:10:25 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [2007.05.09.0030 +0200]:
>> Yes, but that is not always the case, of course. It's not always the
>> case where you can recognize a person so easily that you don't ne
On Wed, 9 May 2007 00:22:40 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [2007.05.08.2220 +0200]:
>> > A slight disadvantage I see in this setup is that it would require
>> > me to carry around my passport all the time which is not exactl
On Wed, 9 May 2007 00:15:03 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> FWIW, I also have no objection in scheduling *also* the global party,
> people not interested can simply avoid to opt-in.
I have no objection either, as long as there is a list of people
attending.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/08/2007 07:15 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> FWIW, I also have no objection in scheduling *also* the global party,
> people not interested can simply avoid to opt-in.
Just for the record, I would also vote for the global party,
I enjoye
also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.09.0030 +0200]:
> Yes, but that is not always the case, of course. It's not always
> the case where you can recognize a person so easily that you don't
> need someone's passport or any other document (because you have
> shared enough time
also sprach David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.08.2220 +0200]:
> > A slight disadvantage I see in this setup is that it would require me
> > to carry around my passport all the time which is not exactly
> > convenient.
>
> Yes, it is inconvenient. Although you can carry a photocopy of
martin f krafft:
> > Yes, it is inconvenient. Although you can carry a photocopy of it, it'd
> > depend on people accepting to sign your key with such a document.
> > In my case, I wouldn't sign someone's key who show me only a photocopy
> > of some ID.
>
> And I might sign your key if we get to k
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:20:16PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> > A slight disadvantage I see in this setup is that it would require me
> > to carry around my passport all the time which is not exactly
> > convenient.
> I'm still a bit confused about the "are you part of group n? No? Oh, sor
On Tue, 8 May 2007 15:20:16 -0500, David Moreno Garza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> AFAICT, most people like the stupidly long keysigning row. Those who
> don't like it, will not show up on it and that's all, as it has
> happened in the past. If you want to be in the big keysigning, be
> prepared
gregor herrmann:
> > The conference will be the ksp which will happen every time when two
> > or more people gather together to check IDs, key fingerprints and
> > hashes.
>
> A slight disadvantage I see in this setup is that it would require me
> to carry around my passport all the time which is
On Tue, 08 May 2007 11:26:33 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> The conference will be the ksp which will happen every time when two
> or more people gather together to check IDs, key fingerprints and
> hashes.
A slight disadvantage I see in this setup is that it would require me
to carry a
20 matches
Mail list logo
