Re: [Debconf-discuss] BOFs as Talks (was: For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?)

2006-06-02 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 07:15:05PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: > This email reminds me that there is something that has nagged me at all the > debconfs I have been: a tendency to conflate and morph BOFs into talks. This has been discussed during the BOF (or was it a talk? :)) at the end of debco

Re: [Debconf-discuss] BOFs as Talks (was: For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?)

2006-06-02 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060602 05:47]: > > This email reminds me that there is something that has nagged me at all the > > debconfs I have been: a tendency to conflate and morph BOFs into talks. > This seems to largely be an artifact of the DebConf organizing team's > decision t

Re: [Debconf-discuss] BOFs as Talks (was: For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?)

2006-06-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 07:15:05PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: > On 2006-05-30, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Indeed, this leads me to think that scheduling a BOF/talk *before* the next > > big KSP, if it happens at Debconf 7, would be a good thing to do. > > I bet that we have

[Debconf-discuss] BOFs as Talks (was: For the next Debconf KSP: run a "pre-KSP" BOF before?)

2006-06-01 Thread Micah Anderson
On 2006-05-30, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, this leads me to think that scheduling a BOF/talk *before* the next > big KSP, if it happens at Debconf 7, would be a good thing to do. > > I bet that we have at least one person, in the Debian gang, who feels > solid enough on t