On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> Any public presentation which is part of any event, including but not
> limited to keynotes, presentations, lightning talks, addresses, mailing list
> posts and forums, is subject to this code of conduc
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> Any public presentation which is part of any event, including but not
> limited to keynotes, presentations, lightning talks, addresses, mailing list
> posts and forums, is subject to this code of conduc
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> Any public presentation which is part of any event, including but not
> limited to keynotes, presentations, lightning talks, addresses, mailing list
> posts and forums, is subject to this code of conduc
Gunnar Wolf writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] DebConf conference policy on
profanity"):
> Ian Jackson dijo [Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:44:48PM +0100]:
> > Right. Her talk (which I found very interesting and illuminating)
> > raised somewhat different issues.
...
> Biella&#x
2014-09-07 16:28 GMT-06:00 Gunnar Wolf :
> Ian Jackson dijo [Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:44:48PM +0100]:
> > Right. Her talk (which I found very interesting and illuminating)
> > raised somewhat different issues.
> >
> > It would have been impossible for her to deal properly with her
> > subject matt
Margarita Manterola dijo [Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:13:07PM +]:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Russ for raising this issue, I think it's worthy of discussion.
>
> My feeling is that completely forbidding profanity (or whatever the
> right word for it is, profanity also seems wrong) doesn't benefit
> DebConf.
Ian Jackson dijo [Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:44:48PM +0100]:
> Right. Her talk (which I found very interesting and illuminating)
> raised somewhat different issues.
>
> It would have been impossible for her to deal properly with her
> subject matter without quoting (and showing) some of her primary
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:13:07PM +, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> Any public presentation which is part of any event, including but not
> limited to keynotes, presentations, lightning talks, addresses, mailing list
> posts and forums, is subject to this code
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:13:07 +, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> My feeling is that completely forbidding profanity (or whatever the
> right word for it is, profanity also seems wrong) doesn't benefit
> DebConf.
> Personally, I do want people to "be excellent to each other", to
> treat each other
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. September 2014, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> -Adult or expletive language;
> -Language which is not appropriate for an all-ages audience.
> +Insults or ad-hominem attacks;
> + We also ask you to avoid language which is not appropriate for an
> all-ages audience as mu
Hi,
Thanks Russ for raising this issue, I think it's worthy of discussion.
My feeling is that completely forbidding profanity (or whatever the right word
for it is, profanity also seems wrong) doesn't benefit DebConf.
Personally, I do want people to "be excellent to each other", to treat each
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:16:15PM +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > I'd like to add that restraining oneself from using profanity (either
> > as a speaker or as an audience member) in a public venue is common
> > courtesy. S
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> I'd like to add that restraining oneself from using profanity (either
> as a speaker or as an audience member) in a public venue is common
> courtesy. Similarly as we choose our words when speaking to strangers.
> I might be tempte
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:11:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
>> about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
>> isn't the right place to t
also sprach Ben Hutchings [2014-09-04 10:58 -0700]:
> It has also not been unusual for a few expletives to appear in
> slides or spoken words in talks at previous DebConfs. So far as
> I know, that hasn't been something people complained about in the
> past.
>
> Given that people are now bringin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:11:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
> about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
> isn't the right place to talk about it, and I've been trying to make a
> point of doi
Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] DebConf conference policy on
profanity"):
> Biella also tweeted one of her slides in advance of her talk, and I
> pointed out the rule to her then. I believe she subsequently discussed
> the (considerable) number of quoted exple
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 20:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
> about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
> isn't the right place to talk about it, and I've been trying to make a
> point of doing my p
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This provision has been ignored on our mailing lists for as long as I've
> been a member of the project. There was some recent discussion of the
> packet radio reference that concluded that this justification was rather
> dubious. I wonder if
alberto fuentes writes:
> [...]
> [0] Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the lists
> via packet radio, where swearing is illegal.
> [...]
> Please refrain from using those words in here. Use poo and m'kay instead[1]
> [0] https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>
alberto fuentes writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] DebConf conference policy on
profanity"):
> [0] Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the lists
> via packet radio, where swearing is illegal.
I doubt anyone is streaming Debconf video over packet radio.
My exper
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> To be specific about what words I'm talking about, I have seen people use
> both "" and "" in a professional HR presentation context with
> basically no reaction (although the latter is much less common). Several
> speakers used those
22 matches
Mail list logo
