The talks team had a meeting on #debconf-team this evening. Thanks to
everyone who showed up.
meetbot summary (and links to logs) are here:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2010/debconf-team.2010-05-26-23.07.html
I wanted to raise two distinct issues with the broader debconf team from
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Pablo Duboue pablo.dub...@gmail.com wrote:
A long while somebody in #debconf-team asked if we can have plain
t-shirts available for sale without sponsor logos.
I share that wish.
That is of course a valid question and I would like to share my
feelings about
Moin,
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with
experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer?
do not schedule anything without giving at least 24h warning in advance.
never.
(and to repeat: I'm
Hi,
If you edit an attendee from the admin interface and this person has reconfirmed
attendance already, this selection is undone (it is set as if the attendee has
not reconfirmed). I do not know if this has something to do with this option
not appearing when editing an attendee from the admin
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
scheduled with no other concurrent events. We are calling these
Plenaries for the moment. If we decide we want to have them, we might
run into a bit of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with
experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer?
do not schedule anything without giving at
On 05/27/2010 08:47 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
scheduled with no other concurrent events.
What are the criteria for these select few?
I would assume the
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
plenaries at all?
I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
point of them is.
___
On 05/27/2010 11:01 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
plenaries at all?
I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
point of them is.
One
On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
leave one of the three categories in a don't know state.
[...]
Any thoughts on this? Am i misunderstanding something?
OK, i've looked into this further. edrz pointed me
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36:49PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:22:33PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
1. It was also noted that we can always add more rooms and slots later.
The smaller room (414, i think) on the same room as Davis auditorium
(for tracking purposes, forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org, which goes
to the RT instance)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:40:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
leave one
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:45:11PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
(for tracking purposes, forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org, which goes
to the RT instance)
Unnecessarily, in this case I now see ... since it is cleared up. Sorry
for not reading before forwarding. -edrz
forwared to RT
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:34:49PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
attached.
-edrz
From 7747fad21e5c5768f7c51ae9d07f133bea00af28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:31:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Increase size of
forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org for RT
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:19:31PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Hi,
If you edit an attendee from the admin interface and this person has
reconfirmed
attendance already, this selection is undone (it is set as if the attendee has
not reconfirmed). I
The headers on the dc10 schedule pages need updating; they still show
dc9 headers afaict:
https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10
I have no idea who can fix this, but hopefully a ticket will help keep
it on the radar.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
The headers on the dc10 schedule pages need updating; they still show
dc9 headers afaict:
https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10
I have no idea who can fix this, but hopefully a ticket will help keep
it on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
