On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Richard Darst r...@zgib.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:16:08PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
There's a lot of work to be done to flesh out such a plan, obviously. If
there's support for this in principle, I would be willing to put some effort
in to help
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
Was the brochure ready that early before? SVN logs suggests that DC10
brochure started being prepared in January, with corrections up to
May. DC9 seems to be done in March. So I think your timing is very
good compared to
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Brian Gupta brian.gu...@brandorr.com wrote:
Looking at it from a sponsor's point of view, raising the donation
threshold would raise questions, where lowering it really won't, but
might raise questions later if we decide we need to raise them again.
I also
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Vedran Omeragic
ved...@vedranomeragic.com wrote:
Hi,
just a friendly reminder, first version of the brochure is ready.
Basically we just added a template and copied most of the text from the
previous years brochure, so as far as design is concern, that's about
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
Two things need to be decided:
1) sponsorship levels (thresholds) and whether to provide a different
set for local sponsors
2) possible rearrangement of benefits suggested by Holger
What would be the preferred way to
Hi,
thank you for informing us. Now that you scared the bejesus out of me, I
think I'll just keep with the local team business.
As for the rest of ToDo list, once again, anyone willing to help is most
welcome. http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf11/ToDo
Best regards
Vedran
On 12/29/2010 10:45
I finally understood the proposed new benefits from the draft
brochure. So we're changing logos in t-shirt to logos in bag for
bronze...
I can see the logos in the t-shirt are more valuable than the logos in
the attendee bags, but dropping logos in t-shirt for bronze seems very
harsh, as I feel
Hi,
We (local/core team) agreed earlier this evening that it would be a better
idea
to lower the sponsorship packages to equal the ones of DC9.
This was because we asked around and ppl told us that the NYC sponsors team
had
problems finding sponsors because the sponsor packages were to high!
I don't think this will be necessary, as we agreed to not have 2 types of
sponsorship (meaning local and global).
One sponsorship type should be enough.
Velimir
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Pablo Duboue pablo.dub...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Damyan Ivanov
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Velimir Iveljic
velimir.li...@foolcontrol.org wrote:
Hi,
We (local/core team) agreed earlier this evening that it would be a better
idea to lower the sponsorship packages to equal the ones of DC9.
Sounds great. Keep the good work!
P.
-=| Velimir Iveljic, Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:40:33PM +0100 |=-
I don't think this will be necessary, as we agreed to not have 2 types of
sponsorship (meaning local and global).
One sponsorship type should be enough.
Okay.
Still, the thresholds and the rearrangement proposed by Holger are
We most certainly can, and looking at this whole conversation here, SHOULD
hold a meeting regarding all of this.
I would also like to mention that, the reduction of the sponsorship packages
wasn't ONLY because of the local sponsors
not being able to reach higher sponsor levels, but MOSTLY because
We are proud to announce the DebConf12 bid for Belo Horizonte, Brazil. We
believe our city is capable of holding such event. It is an important city of
Brazil and it will be hosting some of the games for 2014 world cup. There are
several IT related based in Belo Horizonte, such as Google and IBM,
13 matches
Mail list logo
