On 08/11/12 00:03, Moray Allan wrote:
I have added an approximate translation of the current Le Camp contract
proposal to SVN:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debconf-data/dc13/accounting/contracts/Le_Camp/Contrat%20Debconf13%20-%2030-10-2012%20-%20translation?revision=3828view=markup
In
On 08/11/12 14:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 03:17:12PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:22:20AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Not an anser per se, but just a thank you for this mail. It
summarizes many important points we all feel/know by now.
+1
+1
Hi Lucas,
On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
From my limited understanding of the situation, the current ideal plan
would be to reserve all of LeCamp for both DebCamp and DebConf. While it
really makes sense for DebConf, I'm not so sure about DebCamp: usually,
the number of
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
Have the electrical installation checks been done yet? While I don't
imagine this being a problem, it's not clear what happens if the
checks fail later.
AFAIK they haven't, but it's also still 9 months left.
What are Le Camp meant to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
For several of us, it is quite possible to make this choice
We have to remember the people who don't have the option to pay and
people who contribute so much to Debian that it is just not right to ask
them to pay.
I'm
On 14/11/12 15:56, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
For several of us, it is quite possible to make this choice
We have to remember the people who don't have the option to pay and
people who contribute so much to Debian that it is just not
Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:01:08PM +0100]:
- Remove requirement for 300 people (that day? ever?) before camping
is allowed
I really dont think it's useful to be picky about minor points now. IOW:
I seriously doubt it will be a problem if we have, say 250 people and
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:01:08PM +0100]:
- Remove requirement for 300 people (that day? ever?) before camping
is allowed
I really dont think it's useful to be picky about minor points now. IOW:
I seriously
Hi Gunnar,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:22:28AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Do you possibly want to draft an email calling for such pledges, and it
can be discussed at the next meeting?
Should we ask people to pledge the marginal cost (about 300 CHF), the
professional fee (about 600
On 14/11/12 19:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Gunnar,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:22:28AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Do you possibly want to draft an email calling for such pledges, and it
can be discussed at the next meeting?
Should we ask people to pledge the marginal cost (about 300 CHF),
There was consensus in the sponsors-team meeting today, that labeling
certain hosting providers as Permanent sponsors is suboptimal, as it
it could confuse our otherwise permanent regular financial
sponsors the impression that some sponsorship is more highly valued.
If one goes to our parent site
11 matches
Mail list logo
