On 06/01/2010 10:38 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Another advantage [to having plenaries] might be to communicate specific
concerns to the
broader group, for example if we have a wrap-up session with reportbacks
from track coordinators,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:00:23AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Another topic I'd probably like to see explained and discussed is the
status
quo of the squeeze release. It's kind of the main topic of Debian ;)
hrm. The only release team-ish talk i see is
Andreas Tille dijo [Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:27:26PM +0200]:
Hint: As a scheduler in two previous DebConfs I like to stress this
point of Holger especially because I'm guilty for violating this rule.
It should be clear to the person who is doing this job that it will
be under pressure of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Clint Adams sch...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
plenaries at all?
I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:58:41PM -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote:
I remember Ana telling me on IRC something on the line talks that
will make nobody go to a competing talk in a parallel session. That's
a very strong criteria which /melikes.
Does such a talk exist?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 08:05:07PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:58:41PM -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote:
I remember Ana telling me on IRC something on the line talks that
will make nobody go to a competing talk in a parallel session. That's
a very strong criteria which
The talks team had a meeting on #debconf-team this evening. Thanks to
everyone who showed up.
meetbot summary (and links to logs) are here:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2010/debconf-team.2010-05-26-23.07.html
I wanted to raise two distinct issues with the broader debconf team from
Moin,
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with
experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer?
do not schedule anything without giving at least 24h warning in advance.
never.
(and to repeat: I'm
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
scheduled with no other concurrent events. We are calling these
Plenaries for the moment. If we decide we want to have them, we might
run into a bit of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with
experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer?
do not schedule anything without giving at
On 05/27/2010 08:47 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
scheduled with no other concurrent events.
What are the criteria for these select few?
I would assume the
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
plenaries at all?
I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
point of them is.
___
On 05/27/2010 11:01 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
plenaries at all?
I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
point of them is.
One
13 matches
Mail list logo
