There is a discussion on the Linux kernel mailing list that the
kernel in future will only support architectures that can guarantee
atomic aligned scalar accesses down to the byte level (at the moment
the requirement is only for int (32bit) and long (64bit)). The only
architecture that does not
Hi Aurelien!
I just noticed that there seems to be something wrong with
packages.debian.org regarding sh4. Many packages are not
listed there as available even though they are built and
installed.
For example, src:glibc, has been fully built on sh4, yet:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libc6
Hi folks,
I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also
clearly meant to be
Hi,
On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
* Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
porting, upcoming new ports, or any ports
On 05/09/14 18:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
For example, src:glibc, has been fully built on sh4, yet:
yamato:~# apt-cache policy libc6
libc6:
Installed: 2.19-9
Candidate: 2.19-9
Version table:
*** 2.19-9 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I can only find arch:all packages
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
* Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
porting, upcoming
6 matches
Mail list logo
