to continue futzing around
with tools from woody.
Have you tried installing woody on one of these machines? If you can get
woody installed, we can try booting different kernel versions from the hard
drive, which will be a lot easier to switch out than continuing to build
bootable images.
--
Steve
...).
Fixing this for newer systems with a rebuild is not possible because some of
the issues lie in the closed-source FX!32 code which HP is not at liberty to
release.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
a power cycle of the system?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
message
Which message?
-- but with the correct /tftpboot/filewhatever is now in the dhcpd.conf.
But with 0.0.0.0 for the server ip and the mulitas hw address.
And there were no changes in your dhcpd.conf between the working netboot and
this now failing one?
--
Steve Langasek Give
/alpha-netboot.img and let me know whether
it boots on Multia. I've tested this image on my system, and it boots me up
to the d-i language selection screen; if it does the same for you, that
gives us a starting point for trying to figure out what's changed between
2.2.22 and 2.4.27.
--
Steve
problems with alpha
-- I just know which one I use.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 05:30:17PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 01:37:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, MOP != dhcp. You'll need to configure SRM to use dhcp as the boot
protocol; IIRC the option is something like set ewa0_protocol bootp, but
you may want
problem, and maybe not the same problem as with the CDs.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
is not an
ISO image, it means booting directly from the network via dhcp and tftp.
Still haven't found a FF adapter for the serial cable.
I'll look in my storage locker tomorrow, I know I've got some boxes of
cables and junk there.
Ok, thanks. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:32:24PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:25:58AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
I'll try that. Does etch have the hostap drivers and net_radio
turned on in the kernel, BTW?
Yes.
Ah, great, but only in the 2.6.x
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:53:43AM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:41:24AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
So should the 21040 and 21041 be switched from de2104x to de4x5, or should
de2104x be added to the installer? I seem to recall that I had problems
with de2104x
problems with netboot on the Multia, just CD booting.
The last thing I need is for someone to confirm for me that using unmodified
woody install CDs also works on these same Multia systems that can't boot
sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:31:17AM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:03:39AM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:12:45AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
IIRC, de4x5 can't do full duplex. But then again, de4x5 will work on
all (?) boxes, whereas
-0c2a (= 2.0.2), libstdc++6 (= 4.0.2-4)
Package: libsigc++-2.0-0c2a
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 96
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:21:23AM +0100, Uncurbed wrote:
Steve Langasek skrev:
As of two days ago, the debian-installer svn tree has been switched to use
Linux 2.6.15 exclusively on alpha, instead of the previous 2.4.27. This
means that with the most recent daily builds, all installer images
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.15-5
Severity: important
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:46:01PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:51:45AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
As of two days ago, the debian-installer svn tree has been switched to use
Linux 2.6.15 exclusively
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:46:01PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:51:45AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
As of two days ago, the debian-installer svn tree has been switched to use
Linux 2.6.15 exclusively on alpha, instead of the previous 2.4.27. This
means
upgrade a few specific packages before the
dist-upgrade. Should I upgrade the kernel image to 2.6 first, or just to
2.4.x? Any other packages?
Skipping stable releases is not supported. You have to upgrade to sarge
before you can upgrade to etch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
-testing-alpha-netinst.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/alpha/iso-cd/debian-testing-alpha-businesscard.iso
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/alpha/daily/
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:56:01AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
As of two days ago, the debian-installer svn tree has been switched to use
Linux 2.6.15 exclusively on alpha, instead of the previous 2.4.27. This
means that with the most recent daily builds, all installer
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:47:12AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
As of two days ago, the debian-installer svn tree has been switched to use
Linux 2.6.15 exclusively on alpha, instead of the previous 2.4.27. This
means that with the most recent daily builds, all installer
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 05:44:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:49:04AM +, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
On 1/24/06, Jay Estabrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you can use ldd /wherever/you/find/ulogd to print the
libraries used by ulogd and where
on usenet that some alpha machines simply won't boot the newer
debian releases for install, but that you can install the debian 3.0r6
potato release, and then do dist-upgrades to get the newer stuff
installed and running.
For the record, 3.0r6 is woody, not potato.
--
Steve Langasek
in the BTS. I ended up working around the problem on my own
system by throwing an Adaptec 2940 into my system (which I was then
surprised to find that SRM could see just fine), but I'd like to have that
controller back for the system I lifted it from.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Uwe Schindler wrote:
At 08:39 26.01.2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
Try setting
link_in_boot = Yes
In /etc/kernel-img.conf and reinstalling your kernel image.
OH thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you!
Every time I installed any kernel image
within it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
with d-i is to create a
separate /boot partition, but it's one of the little things that just didn't
get done in time.
You definitely do need to have your symlinks on the same partition as your
kernel for aboot to see and follow them.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
are generated by the kernel).
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2005/08/msg00051.html
It might be nice if someone would be willing to take this code and merge it
with the existing prctl package (currently ia64-only).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 05:44:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:49:04AM +, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
On 1/24/06, Jay Estabrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you can use ldd /wherever/you/find/ulogd to print the
libraries used by ulogd and where
the working and non-working
cases?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2006-01-12 12:18:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
What versions of busybox
busybox isn't installed.
and module-init-tools do you have installed,
module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2
and do you have mkinitrd-tools
:(
I don't have a pws433au, but 2.6.10/11 are quite unsupported by Debian; it's
either 2.6.8 for stable, 2.6.12 for testing, or 2.6.14/15 for unstable.
If you see the same problem with the 2.6.8 or 2.6.15 kernels, I would
suggest a bug report against linux-2.6.
--
Steve Langasek
for the smp kernel?
Possibly. I only have UP alpha systems, so I have no idea about the
usability of the -smp package.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
With the 2.4 (don't remember the exact version) SMP version,
everything works fine.
What SCSI controller is this?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:35:19PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 02:31 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
I installed Debian/Sarge + Updates on a SMP-DS20 (DP264).
The problems encountered
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:31:37PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:28 +0100, Falko Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:35:19PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 02:31 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:05
of little
packages depending on R (binary package r-base-core).
Queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
logo) at boot time on my 433au.
Is tga2 not supported by the tgafb module? I would have expected that it
is.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
31xxx, Gentoo, and AlphaCore I think I tried others but nothing
worked
I install off of a 3r6 cd, and then do a dist upgrade, and that works fine.
Does this dist-upgrade include an upgrade of the kernel and/or installing an
updated aboot boot block on the disk?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
to test on, I'd like to know
whether remastering the boot block with a newer aboot (using the swriteboot
command) leaves you with a bootable system or not, so we can pin down
whether this problem is specific to booting from CD.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
idea to tag these as well? (Not offering to do it myself at
the moment, sorry :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
aren't planning to proactively usertag them.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
is appreciated.
Is your SRM prompt on a monitor, or on a serial console? Having it stop at
that point with *no* further output sounds like the output is going
somewhere other than where you expected.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
out that one of your package's build-dependencies in *unavailable*, rather
than *uninstallable*.
A Dep-Wait has been set now for kdevelop3 on the affected archs.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
is not libc.so.6 on alpha, and /usr/lib/libc_pic/soinit.o is the
object that provides __libc_global_ctors. :P
Opening a bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of these might make interesting little projects for someone interested
in helping with Alpha porting.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 06:06:15PM -0700, Bill Ricker wrote:
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, exceedingly unlikely ... is wishy-washy.
So if you're on the list,
Yes
run Debian on an alpha today,
Yes
and haven't
installed popularity-contest yet, please stand up
to keep up with unstable
reliably, which means sparc needs two whole new buildds to qualify...)
BTW, interesting tidbit -- according to Ryan Murray, there have actually not
been *any* machine offers mailed to debian-admin this year... shrug
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
, it would need to be somewhere that a local admin could
take care of it, in which case it should probably be sent direct to whoever
that would be -- and if we don't have a prospective host, there's no sense
in getting SPI to ship it aronud in the first place.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:13:20PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, exceedingly unlikely that there are less than 50 users is
wishy-washy. I would appreciate it if we could get a concrete count that
tops 50 users. This shouldn't be hard, AFAICT; and I don't
/alphaEtchReleaseRecertification
Thanks, Falk, for the effort. I find it difficult to keep track of
everything going on there, and appreciate this call to arms.
Please don't cc: this thread to debian-release.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
there are any packages for alpha containing binary kernel
modules for AFS; so you probably need openafs-modules-source and a tool such
as module-assistant to let you build the packages for the correct kernel.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
keen to speculate which change is
responsible. If you can give me a list of build-dependency/toolchain
packages whose reported versions differ between the build log on goedel and
the chroot on escher, I can see if I can pin the blame on one of them.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
references to
glibc symbols, you'll presumably need to use different compile flags.
Also in the list of undefined symbols is:
U _setjmp
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
other reason that you
can't typedef it to a long instead of to an int?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
-bit archs...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not the only one being bitten by this, but I'm a bit
stumped as to where to go from here. Any suggestions?
As Tyson suggested, the only available option right now is to use sudo
or su instead of fakeroot.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
seeing on my alpha running a 2.4
kernel, btw) are probably a bug in glibc 2.3.5's LinuxThreads; they may
or may not affect other architectures than alpha.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
garbled?
Are we talking about something that happens shortly after the initrd is
loaded, or is X trying to start on the system? What does your
aboot.conf look like for this?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:46:38AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Unless they're running a fully ppc64 system (which is
contraindicated by kernel and glibc upstream), they're not going to
get the same unaligned traps on ppc as on alpha.
See
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not expect this to be fixed unless you can convert the
kernel-level trap into a userspace backtrace that the developers can act on.
Somewhere in the list archive, there are recipes to get a userspace trap for
these...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:56:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Buggy division function in glibc 2.3.5.
$ .libs/dive_ui
mpz_divexact_ui wrong
a=1198415671637283
d=1198415671637283
q=1
got=0
Aborted
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./libc6/lib/ ./libc6/lib/ld-linux.so.2 .libs
with testing the released installer, not a pre-release?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
to see whether the sarge installer's MD support is usable
on OSF/1 disklabels? I haven't tried it, but I think there might be a good
chance that installing directly to RAID *is* supported.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
set of openafs userspace packages for
alpha. There is also the openafs-modules-source package which can be used
to build the openafs kernel module for your kernel; I haven't tried it on a
current alpha system to see if it works.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gphpedit-0.9.50.orig/src/gtkscintilla2/scintilla/gtk/ScintillaGTK.cxx
+++ gphpedit-0.9.50/src/gtkscintilla2/scintilla/gtk/ScintillaGTK.cxx
@@ -2120,8 +2120,8 @@
extern void Platform_Initialise();
extern void Platform_Finalise
currently allows you
to bypass.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
As reported on debian-alpha, trying to run xorg-xserver on alpha outputs
a large number of
Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 28
messages and then segfaults. Once again, the toolchain has moved the
bar
.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Followup:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:49:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:29:31PM -0400, jacob wrote:
Greetings all.
Today with a day of mixed blessings. I was over-joyed to see X.org
finally make into the Alpha/Sid. However, no amount of convolutions
of building X with
gcc-4.0, as Debian has just started to do. Clearly, X's elfloader is once
more not up to the task of handling real-world ELF relocations.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the boot_flags variable.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obrigado,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
back up and built both of these packages, thanks to the fine work of
the local admin and the buildd maintainer.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
kernel used on the CDs hasn't
changed for months now.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Helge,
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:45:40PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello Frans,
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:02:35PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 13:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
Does this need to be in the release notes when it's already in the
installation manual
when it's already in the
installation manual? Upgrading a woody machine already running milo should
work fine.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
include a Tru64-style full disk slice?
Unfortunately, the sarge version of partman treats overlapping partitions as
an invalid partition table.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(for various and sundry reasons
that have been discussed on this list before).
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:56:40AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
d-i does use swriteboot to install aboot to the disk. That's not the
issue.
The issue is the same that it's always been: Tru64 doesn't cope
sym53c8xx_2 bug (#284961).
No, that bug was diagnosed as being one that only applied to upgrades from
previous 2.4 kernels. Whatever bug you're seeing, it isn't 284961. Can you
provide more detail about what you're seeing?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:09:58PM -0700, Bill Ricker wrote:
Following up on both the original posting re debcamp
and last month's discussion of need for a new buildd
On 19 Mar 2005, at 10:44 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
The failed buildd is a Dual Alpha EV6 666MHz with
512MB RAM and 33GB
running a 2.4.29 kernel; this may or may
not be relevant to trying to reproduce the error.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
firmware if you're willing to
solder :)
I'm not sure if you're being facetious or not... should XLT be changed to
say ARC only? Can anyone confirm that this is true for all machines in
this class?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be working on
involving alpha. If you have a request for a certain subarch or have some
idea involving alpha, please mail me. I will coordinate with Andreas as to
what
we can actually get hold of.
Anyone want to package MILO for etch? :-)
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:34:17AM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
Anyone want to package MILO for etch? :-)
Which machines cannot run aboot ? (ie. do not have SRM)
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.alpha/ch05s01.html
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
, reimbursment and stuff need to be negotiated with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yah, I've already replied to Ean on -project.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
idea
what would cause this, but it sounds like hardware-specific wackiness to me.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
because the trap
is exposed to userspace (i.e., SIGBUS), making it much simpler to get a
backtrace.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in this
function with the x86 code the kernel runs fine (file:
arch/alpha/kernel/irq.c).
Ah, that sounds like the crash I was seeing, though it triggered only when
running hotplug. Do you have a patch for this that could be sent to the
Debian kernel maintainers?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern
when running 2.6, as
some miscellaneous driver that's loaded causes a kernel panic. Haven't
tracked it down yet -- since I'm not running serial console, the details of
the crash scroll off the screen and are lost.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital
.
Is there a known solution to this ? I can not run gdm, kdm etc.. all
will dump core..
Never heard of it. Do you have any backtraces of these crashing programs?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 10:00:54AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is the final patch resulting from my investigations. -Os
is the culprit here, as originally suspected. :)
Can you nail it down to a particular source file? I would like to know
be using)?
I'll grab the sources and see what I can find out on my alpha here.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Kilian,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:09:19AM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2005, 14:54 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
i've come to find a large problem debugging the FTBFS listed in
http://buildd.debian.org
, i'm all ears.
Attached is the final patch resulting from my investigations. -Os is the
culprit here, as originally suspected. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--- gnugk-2.2.1.orig/Makefile.in
+++ gnugk-2.2.1/Makefile.in
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@
# GK version infomation
STDCCFLAGS
them work, it'd be interesting
to have em86 as a multiarch target for alpha... :)
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
system.(?)
Well, you ought to upgrade to 2.4.27-2 anyway, since it includes a number of
security fixes over 2.4.27-1; and if the problem still occurs with 2.4.27-2,
a bug report would certainly be in order.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital
201 - 300 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
