Le lundi 16 avril 2007 à 07:34 -0500, Bob Tracy a écrit :
[..]
The old x86 boxes I mentioned aren't running Debian. No particular
reason for that other than Debian didn't exist when those machines were
originally put into service.
Debian does exist since August 1993, what kind of machines are
Jerome Warnier wrote:
Le lundi 16 avril 2007 _ 07:34 -0500, Bob Tracy a _crit :
[..]
The old x86 boxes I mentioned aren't running Debian. No particular
reason for that other than Debian didn't exist when those machines were
originally put into service.
Debian does exist since August
Le samedi 12 mai 2007 à 08:24 -0500, Bob Tracy a écrit :
Jerome Warnier wrote:
Le lundi 16 avril 2007 _ 07:34 -0500, Bob Tracy a _crit :
[..]
The old x86 boxes I mentioned aren't running Debian. No particular
reason for that other than Debian didn't exist when those machines were
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:08:01AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:35:03PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
(2) being unable to build firefox with gcc/g++ 4.X (compiler segfault
during build). firefox-1.5.X and -2.0.X build fine with gxx-3.4,
Steve Langasek wrote:
(yet something else demonstrating that I know just enough about apt
and friends to be dangerous :-))
Understood that I can get out of the firefox building business for Alpha
if I really want to...
(...) the official firefox releases
are for i686 (...)
Um? Is this
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:35:03PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
(2) being unable to build firefox with gcc/g++ 4.X (compiler segfault
during build). firefox-1.5.X and -2.0.X build fine with gxx-3.4,
although it takes nearly eight hours for a build to finish due to
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:35:03PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
(2) being unable to build firefox with gcc/g++ 4.X (compiler segfault
during build). firefox-1.5.X and -2.0.X build fine with gxx-3.4,
although it takes nearly eight hours for a build to finish due to
incredibly long ld
rct wrote:
Congratulations to the Debian team on the occasion of the Etch release
for the Alpha! I have my 21 CDs in hand, and will give them a good
working over on my PWS 433au beginning next week. Apologies for the
delay, but it's federal income tax season and I'll have no spare time
On Tue 10 Apr 2007, Bob Tracy wrote:
Other annoyances (minor, but worth mentioning):
(1) unaligned trap messages in the system logs for various applications.
I honestly don't know how or to whom these should be reported. As far
as the package maintainers are concerned, the number
Unaligned traps point to code needing fixing, not binutils / whatever.
radvd (IPv6 support)? Version 1.0-1 of that package is what's
generating
most of the unaligned trap messages I'm seeing.
Network code often displays unaligned traps, because it does a read of
network data, and then
Paul Slootman wrote:
Unaligned traps point to code needing fixing, not binutils / whatever.
radvd (IPv6 support)? Version 1.0-1 of that package is what's generating
most of the unaligned trap messages I'm seeing.
Network code often displays unaligned traps, because it does a read of
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 03:43:13PM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
The simpliest is to install the prctl package (which is now available for
alpha, too, as the kernels are compatible to that:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/prctl ) and start the program with
prctl and set the flag to send
Congratulations to the Debian team on the occasion of the Etch release
for the Alpha! I have my 21 CDs in hand, and will give them a good
working over on my PWS 433au beginning next week. Apologies for the
delay, but it's federal income tax season and I'll have no spare time
until after the
13 matches
Mail list logo
