On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:57:36PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 04 Feb 2003, Adrian Godwin wrote:
> >
> > Could I subsequently swap the 4GB drive for some other
> > SCA drive, or will the carrier impose restrictions on the
> > type of drive fitted ?
> >
> > Does SCA supercede the old ul
On Tue 04 Feb 2003, Adrian Godwin wrote:
>
> Could I subsequently swap the 4GB drive for some other
> SCA drive, or will the carrier impose restrictions on the
> type of drive fitted ?
>
> Does SCA supercede the old ultra, fast and wide options,
> or do you get SCA Ultra, SCA Wide etc ?
SCA i
At 12:51 03/02/03 -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
>RZ29B-VW is a 4GB drive, and would work in the 5300 builtin shelf.
Could I subsequently swap the 4GB drive for some other
SCA drive, or will the carrier impose restrictions on the
type of drive fitted ?
Does SCA supercede the old ultra, fast and w
Bugger, I have the same server with a full rack of 18 gig hot swap
scsi's but the mobo is fried. I had a look and I can see a burnt
capacitor. Not being the engineering type (soldering guns get stuck to
the board for some reason), I'm now looking for a replacement
motherboard for the beast.
If any
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Adrian Godwin wrote:
> variant of SCSI that this uses. The drive is numbered FR-CFCBA-CA and
> RZ1DB-VH, and some Googling indicates that this is probably an SCA drive
> in a StorageWorks module but I don't really know what that means ..
I usually open the box and check out wh
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:44:36PM +, Adrian Godwin wrote:
> I have a Digital 5300-6533A shipped with NT but now running
> Debian;it runs nicely but has only a single 9.1GB disk, which
> is looking rather small by today's standards.
>
> It seems like a good idea to keep an eye out for some s
6 matches
Mail list logo
