On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
> which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all
> porters should be aware of.
We have debian-devel-announce for that, the ex
Steve McIntyre dixit:
>>That seems like a bad idea to me, tbh. There will be people who won't
>>notice that the meaning of debian-ports@ has changed, and who will try
>>to use it with its old meaning.
>favour of the existing behaviour. If anybody does use try to use it
>that way in future, the ne
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all porters
should be aware of.
It's not really that mails going to debian-ports@ appear that often.
PS: Excuse my quoting style, currently on mobile.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:38:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> >>Alexander Wirt dixit:
>> >>
Hi,
(haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >>Alexander Wirt dixit:
> >>
> >>>C
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>Alexander Wirt dixit:
>>
>>>Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from
>>>listmaster side?
>>
>>1. Remove whatever debian-po...@lists.debian.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>Alexander Wirt dixit:
>
>>Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from
>>listmaster side?
>
>1. Remove whatever debian-po...@lists.debian.org is right now
>
>2. Create a new debian-po...@lists.debian.org maili
Alexander Wirt dixit:
>Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from
>listmaster side?
1. Remove whatever debian-ports@l.d.o is right now
2. Create a new debian-ports@l.d.o mailing list which
works just like the other regular lists
3. Announce the new debian-ports@l.d.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
> >all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
> >confusing setup to many peop
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
>all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
>confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
>noise that's prob
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
>On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
>>mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
>
>That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
>porting, upco
Hi,
On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
>mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
porting, upcoming new ports, or any ports
12 matches
Mail list logo
