Hi,
Harald Dunkel writes:
I would like to contribute some updated nvidia-graphics-drivers
packages (1.0-6629) for amd64. This stuff is based upon Randall's
packages for i386 and the changes done by Markus Benning a few
months ago.
Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't it be best if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Schmalzing wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Harald Dunkel writes:
|
|
|I would like to contribute some updated nvidia-graphics-drivers
|packages (1.0-6629) for amd64. This stuff is based upon Randall's
|packages for i386 and the changes done by Markus Benning a
Hi Harald,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:30:00AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I would like to contribute some updated nvidia-graphics-drivers
packages (1.0-6629) for amd64. This stuff is based upon
Randall's packages for i386 and the changes done by Markus
Benning a few months ago.
Markus is
Would it be hard to give legacy support for old-style linux threads? This
has turned up several times as a serious issue now..
/Mattias Wadenstein
On 04-Nov-10 11:21, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
Would it be hard to give legacy support for old-style linux threads? This
has turned up several times as a serious issue now..
Which packages are affected? There was a problem with mysql-dfsg which
has been resolved. If there are other packages
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Nov-10 11:21, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
Would it be hard to give legacy support for old-style linux threads? This
has turned up several times as a serious issue now..
Which packages are affected? There was a problem with mysql-dfsg which
has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederik Schueler wrote:
| Hi Harald,
|
| On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:30:00AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
|
|I would like to contribute some updated nvidia-graphics-drivers
|packages (1.0-6629) for amd64. This stuff is based upon
|Randall's packages for
Thanks, Manuele. I downgrading to before 2.6.8 seemed to do the trick.
Good to know this is not AMD64 specific.
christoph
Manuele Rampazzo wrote:
Hi,
Christoph Hebeisen wrote:
On a related note, as far as I understand, 2.6.9 has a different mass
storage driver than 2.6.8. Since cdrecord doesn't
I installed amd64 of a few of our blades a month ago and noticed at that
time the autofs packages were still broken(needed a header change to
work with 64bit). I compiled autofs seperately outside of the dpkg
system and moved on. Just wondering if this has been corrected yet
since I'd rather
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 03:26:28AM +0200, Count L?szl? de Alm?sy wrote:
I'm having some problems with audio now that I've started using the
2.6.9 kernel that I built. Audio did work with the
2.6.8-3-amd64-k8-smp kernel that came with the install image.
lspci shows the audio controller:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:30:00AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I would like to contribute some updated nvidia-graphics-drivers
packages (1.0-6629) for amd64. This stuff is based upon
Randall's packages for i386 and the changes done by Markus
Benning a few months ago.
But I am still in the
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Nov-10 11:21, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
Would it be hard to give legacy support for old-style linux threads? This
has turned up several times as a serious issue now..
On 04-Nov-10 12:24, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Nov-10 11:21, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
Would it be hard to give legacy support for old-style linux threads? This
has turned up several times as a serious issue now..
Which packages are
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Programs which have been compiled and linked for the use with
linuxthreads should usually also work with nptl at runtime. This is
exactly what happens on i386 if you run any 2.6 kernel. An i386
system uses the nptl thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
|
| Right now I would be happy to get 6629 to even work on i386. It shows
| the nvidia logo, and then stays there. I can log in and such, but
| nothing is displayed other than the logo, and if I swich away from X to
| console
On 04-Nov-10 20:20, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Programs which have been compiled and linked for the use with
linuxthreads should usually also work with nptl at runtime. This is
exactly what happens on i386 if you run any 2.6
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:00:06 -0500, Lennart Sorensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well some ac97 implementations are backwards due to intel changing the
spec at some point, and your chip may have its inputs and outputs
swapped around. On some newer boards you end up with lineout actually
being
Richard Wohlstadter wrote:
I installed amd64 of a few of our blades a month ago and noticed at that
time the autofs packages were still broken(needed a header change to
work with 64bit). I compiled autofs seperately outside of the dpkg
system and moved on. Just wondering if this has been
Jonas Diemer wrote:
PS: Please CC me in your replies, I am not subscribed to the list.
I get a kernelpanic, saying that the root filesys couldn't be mounted. I
guess this is because the sata driver (I believe it is sata_nv) is
compiled as a module. Am I correct?
Almost certainly.
What
19 matches
Mail list logo
