Title: RE: problems with nautilus
It was the noauto devices. I would like to mention however that nautilus works well in Debian i386 with all devices in the fstab. So I assume that this bug is AMD64 specific.
Any plans when this bug will be fixed?
/Johan
-Original Message-
From:
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 10:38 schrieb Johan Groth:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
We will atleast have a released version of the sarge repository, with
updates if there are, and security updates.
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 20:24, Soenke von Stamm wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 10:38 schrieb Johan Groth:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
We will atleast have a released version of the
Still not available?
Is the Packages file corrupt?
Anyone :)
Colin Yates wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning
that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried
ftp.de.debian.org with the same result.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Colin
Johan Groth wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Jan Houstek wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
We will atleast have a released version of the sarge repository, with
updates if there are, and security updates.
That's good news. Any chance this port will become a part of the official
stable in some future
Bob Proulx wrote:
[snip]
Because Ubuntu is based on Debian all of this work is directly
benefiting that project. And they have released amd64 and are
supporting it. Therefore if you need a released and supported
environment for amd64 then Ubuntu is probably the answer.
Not if you wish to have a
However I am sticking with pure Debian for the moment. I have not
yet given up on it. I am using everyone's work hosted on Alioth. I
will probably deploy an unofficial 'Sarge' on amd64 in a production
environment. Eventually an official Debian 'Etch' will replace it.
That will probably
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning
that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried
ftp.de.debian.org with the same result.
There doesn't seem to exist anything like a
Downloaded from (can't remember exact path) but
people.debian/something/debootstrap from a couple of days ago.
Unfortunately debootstrap --version doesn't work :(
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth
Thank goodness for Nautilus waste bin :)
It is version 0.1.16.4
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning
that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:19:30PM +, Colin Yates wrote:
Downloaded from (can't remember exact path) but
people.debian/something/debootstrap from a couple of days ago.
Unfortunately debootstrap --version doesn't work :(
Did you install it as a debian package? Then what does dpkg -l
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
For the gcc-3.4 archive, my intention is to freeze sarge when it is
released and to make it available as
Well, what exactly makes gcc-3.4 such a must? I'm trying to decide which
debian port to use for production (your comming gcc-3.4 sarge or the
Hi,
I have a problem with korganizer on debian amd64/gcc-3.4. I've submitted a
bug report about that to the package maintainer (bug# 281143). But he
suggested me to contact the debian-amd64 team. (The bug report follow).
This bug seems to be the reported in KDE bug system by a gentoo 64 user:
On 04-Nov-16 18:31, Jan Houstek wrote:
Well, what exactly makes gcc-3.4 such a must? I'm trying to decide which
debian port to use for production (your comming gcc-3.4 sarge or the
already existent gcc-3.3 sarge).
gcc-3.4 is definitively not a 'must'. gcc-3.3 will work in most cases
and the
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote:
Is it possible to apply the patch on the debian package to solve the
problem for this version (3.3.1) ?
My bug description:
---
Package: korganizer
Version: 4:3.3.0-3
Did you already try the 4:3.3.1-3 version?
From the bug report, it sounds like this is a general amd64 bug (not just
linux) and it has been patched in CVS (but not 3.3.1). So it will be fixed
in 3.3.2
-Ted
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 11:44, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais
I've installed 3.3.1-3 and it's working now...
Thanks a lot!
Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote:
Is it possible to apply the patch on the debian package to solve the
problem for this version (3.3.1) ?
My bug description:
---
Package:
Hello,
I know this question is probably better suited for an nividia linux
forum (where I have posted it 2 minutes ago) but I thought I might
check with people on this list too, maybe somebody knows.
I recently bought an athlon64 nvidia nforce3 box, and have not been
able to install anything
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:41:18PM +0100, Alexandru Cabuz wrote:
I know this question is probably better suited for an nividia linux
forum (where I have posted it 2 minutes ago) but I thought I might
check with people on this list too, maybe somebody knows.
I recently bought an athlon64
hi
i have posted that already on the vpopmail mailinglist but as it
is an amd64 related problem i'll post it here too...
greets
KoS
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin Kos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:25:57 +0100
Subject: vchkpw segfault
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:41:18PM +0100, Alexandru Cabuz wrote:
My question is this:
Is there any way to get the ethernet and the sound going on nforce3
in Sarge 386, that is, without installing the true amd64 port which is
not yet finished, and which therefore might be more trouble
So which motherboard is this, and which ethernet adapter and sound is it
using?
Quoting directly from the manual:
K8N Neo (MS 7030) v1.X ATX mainboard based on nVidia nForce 3 250Gb
chipset for optimal system efficiency.
LAN
nVidia nForce 3 250Gb LAN controller
Integrated Fast
Did you try the 2.4 kernel or the 2.6 kernel for i386?
I tried both. Hell, I tried everything. The thing is I tried this
installation so many times, I forget the details, all I know is that
the network didn't work anyway I tried it. ifconfig couldn't see any
eth interface. I tried to configure
Hello,
I've got a java project to built with ant,
but it's not being built correctly
From the build-log:
ant depends-on libbsf-java
libsf-java needs j2sdk1.3 and libservelet2.3
I am not sure if there is even a j2sdk1.3 for amd64,
but I know there are both j2sdk1.4-blackdown and also
24 matches
Mail list logo
