John Baab wrote:
I am attempting to install the ati drives located here:
http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/
Using the instructions in this faq:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
/usr/src/modules/fglrx-kernel-src/agpgart_be.c: In function
Hi Max,
Thanks for the walkthrough... there are a few missing libraries on my
system however, i had to also apt-get install libstlport4.6, and its now
asking for libz.so.1, not sure what that is or where it comes from
any idea?
Many thanks,
James
Max wrote:
Hello!
I've just successfully
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 06:30 am, Max wrote:
4) Install openoffice.org-amd64 with the following command:
apt-get install openoffice.org-amd64 openoffice.org openoffice.org-l10n-en
ttf-opensymbol
I get this error:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
openoffice.org-amd64:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 09:23 am, Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 06:30 am, Max wrote:
4) Install openoffice.org-amd64 with the following command:
apt-get install openoffice.org-amd64 openoffice.org
openoffice.org-l10n-en ttf-opensymbol
I get this error:
The
James,
libz.so.1 is a part of zlib1g package.
You can search within the packages content at http://packages.debian.org/
Max
James Titcumb wrote:
Hi Max,
Thanks for the walkthrough... there are a few missing libraries on my
system however, i had to also apt-get install libstlport4.6, and its now
Egon,
try to add 'ia32-libs-openoffice.org' to the end of 'apt-get install ...' line.
There is a mess in dependencies at the moment ;(
Max
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 06:30 am, Max wrote:
4) Install openoffice.org-amd64 with the following command:
apt-get install
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 09:31 am, Max wrote:
libz.so.1 is a part of zlib1g package.
You can search within the packages content at http://packages.debian.org/
Hi Max,
# dpkg -l zlib1g libstlport4.6
snip
ii zlib1g 1.2.2-4
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 06:30 am, Max wrote:
I've just successfully installed openoffice.org-amd64 and it works just
great! No need to keep 32-bit openoffice in chroot32 anymore.
Max,
out of interest: how did you get it working?
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Egor,
Hmm, it happens to use some 32-bit libraries. libz.so.1 is one of them and
should be installed within /emul/ia32-linux/
So now I'm not even sure that this OpenOffice is 64-bit. ;-/
What I have here:
$ ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
linux-gate.so.1 = (0x)
Hello folks,
look at this link, it works !!!
http://www.badopi.org/node/669
Somewhere was the same message in English, but don know where any more.
I hope, it will help either.
Best regards
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Frederik,
I would like to collect additional topics and scedule proposals for
the IRC meeting about the future of the debian-amd64 sarge
distribution.
Is this intended to be an open meeting? If so, I would like to listen
in.
Cheers
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everybody
where can I find kernel 2.6.11 sources for debian-amd64 ?
thanks a lot
--
Erwann PENCREACH
Le coeur rclame une femme, les sens plusieurs, et l'orgueil toutes.
-+- Jean Rostand (1894-1977) -+-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
NaiosKAE{FR} wrote:
Hi everybody
where can I find kernel 2.6.11 sources for debian-amd64 ?
thanks a lot
apt-cache search kernel 2.6.11 source
Lukasz Pieczara
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Erwann.
You can use the vanilla sources and (x)config your x86_64 kernel yourself if
you want:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
or if you have an debian-amd64 installation already, run:
apt-cache search kernel-source
and you can choose.
Chris W.
Erwann/Chris,
I would advise using a debian packaged one, with the debian patches already
in... I've tried using a vanilla source before, and it threw out a few
strange errors on compile... however, you could always patch the stock source
with the debian patches, as that worked for me.
I've already tried apt-cache search kernel-source and there is no 2.6.11
kernel (I need it to build my Nvidia drivers)
I'll try the vanilla one
thanks a lot
--
Erwann PENCREACH
Le coeur réclame une femme, les sens plusieurs, et l'orgueil toutes.
-+- Jean Rostand (1894-1977) -+-
--
To
I believe Markus Benning has updated the HOWTO to reflect my previous comment.
Or whoever has done it, thank you.
But I think some people have still difficulty in following the steps; thus I
have updated my local copy of chroot install only. I have attached my local
HOWTO for reference. I used
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:01 +0200, luk wrote:
NaiosKAE{FR} wrote:
Hi everybody
where can I find kernel 2.6.11 sources for debian-amd64 ?
thanks a lot
apt-cache search kernel 2.6.11 source
Lukasz Pieczara
kernel sources are already there. Look:
$ apt-cache search
Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:01 +0200, luk wrote:
NaiosKAE{FR} wrote:
Hi everybody
where can I find kernel 2.6.11 sources for debian-amd64 ?
thanks a lot
apt-cache search kernel 2.6.11 source
Lukasz Pieczara
kernel sources are already there. Look:
$
Current do_dchroot script in howto doesn't work with ' in parameters.
This is what I use:
#!/bin/bash
for (( i=1; $i=$#; i=$i+1 )); do
esc[$i]=$(sed -e 's#\([^[:alnum:]]\)#\\\1#g' ${!i})
done
exec dchroot -c ia32 -d $(basename $0) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maybe it escapes little to much, but it
Toshikazu Aiyama, Ph.D. wrote:
A.E.Lawrence wrote:
I have a similar set up with you:
ASUS a8n-sli Deluxe mbrd populated with 5 hard disks:
a) 1 scsi MO on adaptec 2940UW
b) 1 PATA primary master
c) 4 sata on nv_sata, none on sil_SATA
In addition, I have 1 DVD-RAM, and 1 CD-RW on PATA secondary.
At the moment 2.6.11 is only in SID, I seem to recall seeing something
about it making its way to sarge in the next week or so.
On Apr 12, 2005 6:58 AM, Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:01 +0200, luk wrote:
NaiosKAE{FR} wrote:
Hi
I'm confused now... My sources.list:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
(indicating that I use sarge)
bathory4:~# apt-cache search kernel-source-2.6.11
Forgot to CC the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Baab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 12, 2005 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Installer and installed system differ in disk enumeration
To: A E Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had a similiar problem while using a pata and a sata
Hi Pete,
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64
Looks like James is using Sid, not Sarge - that would explain the
difference.
Cheers
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:46:24AM -0700, Max wrote:
Hmm, it happens to use some 32-bit libraries. libz.so.1 is one of them and
should be installed within /emul/ia32-linux/
So now I'm not even sure that this OpenOffice is 64-bit. ;-/
I thought openoffice.org upstream had said they are doing
That explains a lot... like why I can always seems to download things before
they reach sarge... :) I kept getting confused when people said package xxx
hasn't been released in sarge yet, its still in sid, yet I already had it ;)
Thanks for clearing that up, guys :)
James
Daniel James [EMAIL
Hi'
I'm sorry and I know that you're not here for these work but what does
Error: too many hops (in reply to end of DATA command) mean in postfix
logs and has the mail been sent?
--
Erwann PENCREACH
Le coeur rclame une femme, les sens plusieurs, et l'orgueil toutes.
-+- Jean Rostand
before i ask stupid questions
is there a support status page for amd64
im interested in buying an FX cpu and then which video
card is best supported (non-GPL will do) so nvidia or ati
also whats mainboard support like
im looking at a pci-e dfi lanparty board
yeah so i like games. bah.
Dean
--
WWW:
to the weary traveller i was of course refering to running
debian on the aforementioned hardware
Dean
Zachary Rizer wrote:
The page you are looking for is here:
http://www.google.com
Regards,
Zaq
--- Dean Hamstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
before i ask stupid questions
is there a support status
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:02:47AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
before i ask stupid questions
is there a support status page for amd64
im interested in buying an FX cpu and then which video
card is best supported (non-GPL will do) so nvidia or ati
Nvidia absolutely has the best drivers of
Nvidia absolutely has the best drivers of those two. I would not
personally buy an ATI for running a Linux system.
thats the quick summary im after. thanks
also whats mainboard support like
Well the list has had a number of messages on that you can find in the
archive. I think I have seen
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:40:49AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
oh 'lanparty' thats the name of the line.
http://www.dfi.com.tw/Product/xx_product_spec_details_r_us.jsp?PRODUCT_ID=3469CATEGORY_TYPE=LPSITE=US
thats the model im planning on getting
cool uv aside it has good specs.
chipset is
Hello,
The current scedule proposal is to meet on saturday 23rd, what allows us
to find a timeframe fitting everyone's needs.
I think 7:00 UTC is a good idea, alternatively 14:00 UTC.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:30:09PM -0700, Alex Perry wrote:
I suspect another relevant agenda item is: Which
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:05:41AM +0100, Daniel James wrote:
Is this intended to be an open meeting? If so, I would like to listen
in.
Everyone interested can join, of course :-) We will publish a log on
alioth for those who cannot attend.
Kind regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
Hi,
I'm using the gcc4 archive. Today apt-get wanted to install
the new package realtimebattle-common but the following errors were
encountered:
Selecting previously deselected package realtimebattle-common.
Unpacking realtimebattle-common (from
In case anyone wonders, I worked around this problem by doing the
following:
mv /usr/share/locale/locale.alias{,.saved}
apt-get -o DPkg::Options={\--force-overwrite\;} -t testing dist-upgrade
mv /usr/share/locale/locale.alias{.saved,}
Note, the local.alias file installed by
Do you want inexpensive Ambien?
http://www.p1k.net/p/viks/1/
or 160 other drugs:
http://www.p1k.net/p/viks
you carcinogenic me tuberculin me you ain't me accelerate me
you lynn me portentous me you humphrey me inseminate me you debtor me
iodinate me you sauterne me granular me
Wow! Such great replies!
From what has been said, it looks like a dual opteron with a bunch of
memory will do the job. Being a state agency we also need to get 3
bids, so it is extra nice that there are more than a few vendors for
these machines.
I've got a bit of web searching to see what I can
Hi,
does anyone of the amd64 porting team plan to provide KDE 3.4 packages based
on those in pool/experimental, or should everyone who wants them build them
from source?
regards,
Volker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 07:53:39PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote:
does anyone of the amd64 porting team plan to provide KDE 3.4 packages based
on those in pool/experimental, or should everyone who wants them build them
from source?
Someone already did. It was mentioned on the list in the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:56:22PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Someone already did. It was mentioned on the list in the last week or
two. Check the archives I guess.
deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64 ./
or, until gluck is back online:
deb http://ropecon.fi/~killer/debian ./
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all. Why there are no proper Contents file in pure64 packages
repositories? apt-file doesn't work with the pure64 port.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
bb (the aalib demo) is reproducably segfaulting for me when I run the
amd64 build; the i386 build works fine in my chroot. I'm planning to
report the bug, but I was hoping someone here could confirm that it
happens to them too.
Hardware:
Athlon64 3400+
DFI Lanparty nf3 250gb
Sound Blaster Live
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:01:31PM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
bb (the aalib demo) is reproducably segfaulting for me when I run the
amd64 build; the i386 build works fine in my chroot. I'm planning to
report the bug, but I was hoping someone here could confirm that it
happens to them too.
I
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:01:31PM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
bb (the aalib demo) is reproducably segfaulting for me when I run the
amd64 build; the i386 build works fine in my chroot. I'm planning to
report the bug, but I was hoping someone here could confirm that it
happens to them too.
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:01, Corey Hickey wrote:
bb (the aalib demo) is reproducably segfaulting for me when I run the
amd64 build; the i386 build works fine in my chroot. I'm planning to
report the bug, but I was hoping someone here could confirm that it
happens to them too.
Confirm.
info on postfix in french :
http://www.postfix.org/non-english.html#french
otherwise on their mailing lists :
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 16:14, NaiosKAE{FR} wrote:
Hi'
I'm sorry and I know that you're not here for these work but what does
Error: too many
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:14:09PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Yes I get a segfault running with the default options here too.
Maybe I will investigate... :)
Well here is what gdb returns:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 46912510027664 (LWP
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:43:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 05:14:09PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Yes I get a segfault running with the default options here too.
Maybe I will investigate... :)
Well here is what gdb returns:
Program received signal
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:25, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
Confirm. Although I got so mesmerised by the images that I forgot to time
it.
6. After 3 minutes 47 seconds (+/- a couple seconds) bb segfaults. It
happens right before the section with the toroid.
hmmm, actually here it goes
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Turns out it is a memory wipe caused elsewhere in the program as far as
I can tell.
If you fix this bug, it seems to run perfectly all the way through:
tex.c line 95:
Was: memset(zbuff, 0x55, (X_s * Y_s * sizeof(long)));
Should be: memset(zbuff, 0x55, (X_s * Y_s
Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:25, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
Confirm. Although I got so mesmerised by the images that I forgot to time
it.
6. After 3 minutes 47 seconds (+/- a couple seconds) bb segfaults. It
happens right before the section with the toroid.
Aalib includes an X11 driver for its text rendering that is much faster
than the console drivers. For some reason the aalib debs on alioth
aren't built with X11 support. I can build the debs on my own machine
and they have X11 automatically, so I don't know what's wrong.
Thanks,
Corey
--
To
54 matches
Mail list logo
