Re: Realplayer in 32 chroot no sound

2005-05-09 Thread Christian Hammers
Hi On 2005-05-09 Tobias Krais wrote: I use ALSA as Soundsystem and have a snd_inte8x0 module in use. In 64 bit everything works out well. I have a selfcompiled vanilla kernel and compiled 32bit Soundemulation as Module. Do you have an hints? Check if all necessary devices were made in

Re: VMware

2005-05-09 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:34:43PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: AFAIKT from the VMware site, VMware supports specific versions of distros/kernels. It is ambiguous, at least to me, to say they support 64bit when they say they support i.e. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 8 - stock 2.4.19, 64-bit.

Re: question

2005-05-09 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 07:41:06PM +0200, Marcin D?bicki wrote: I have nForce 3 250 chipset for now and I really have no idea what nForce Network Adapter it is. Probably a kind of Marvell (and I use forcedeth for it). Also as a secondary there is Marvell Yukon which works fine with sk98lin.

Re: Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

2005-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.3.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ... Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-1) ... Setting up ia32-libs (1.3.0.0.1.gcc4) ... Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Mozart for amd64

2005-05-09 Thread Kevin Glynn
Hi, I am the maintainer of the Mozart/Oz package. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/mozart I am also one of the upstream developers. This software doesn't currently build on any of the 64 bit architectures and making it do so will, I think, be a bit hairy and quite a bit of work.

g++ compile failure

2005-05-09 Thread Mario
Hi everyone! I'm trying to compile the source added below, which works on many other systems (32 Bit SuSE and Debian, 64Bit SuSE) but not with debian-amd64. My current compiler says the following, but the problem has been present in amd64-pure64 repository since I started using debian-amd64

Re: g++ compile failure

2005-05-09 Thread Ernest jw ter Kuile
if you want people to test, then this is missing. boost/spirit/core.hpp I suspect, however, you would be beter off on the gcc list. amd64 is officially supported there. Cheers, Ernest. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: g++ compile failure

2005-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi everyone! I'm trying to compile the source added below, which works on many other systems (32 Bit SuSE and Debian, 64Bit SuSE) but not with debian-amd64. My current compiler says the following, but the problem has been present in amd64-pure64 repository

Re: Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

2005-05-09 Thread Harald Dunkel
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. Still no change: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs Reading Package Lists... Done Building

netinstall : no module

2005-05-09 Thread Emmanuel Doguet
The install seem to have no module for my networks cards (nvidia Gigabit or/and via-rhine II). Where I can find 64 bits drivers for them ? thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: question

2005-05-09 Thread Marcin Dębicki
Lennart Sorensen kiedys napisal: On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 07:41:06PM +0200, Marcin D?bicki wrote: I have nForce 3 250 chipset for now and I really have no idea what nForce Network Adapter it is. Probably a kind of Marvell (and I use forcedeth for it). Also as a secondary there is Marvell Yukon

Re: Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

2005-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. Still no change: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install

Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011

2005-05-09 Thread Joerg Rossdeutscher
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2005, 15:41 + schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh): I've asked Asus support, the reply (In French) is that they have no UNIX/linux support for the moment, sorry for the inconvenient. I've also contacted Asus. The answer I got today is... bizzare: Dear Friend :

Re: question

2005-05-09 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:12:44PM +0200, Marcin D?bicki wrote: I just wanted to say that the primary adapter I call this device is a device like Marvell Yukon (not Yukon) but nForce has an API used to hide real interface from OS. True adapter driver is on nvidia chipset because only chipset

glx for ia32 applications does not work

2005-05-09 Thread Alexander Fieroch
Hello, I've no problems starting 64bit glx applications like glxgears, but starting glxgears in ia32 chroot I get a Segmentation fault. Starting doom3 in ia32 chroot I get the following error: [...] - Initializing Sound System -- sound system initialized.

Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011

2005-05-09 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 09.05.2005 20:55:17, Joerg Rossdeutscher a écrit : Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2005, 15:41 + schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh): I've asked Asus support, the reply (In French) is that they have no UNIX/linux support for the moment, sorry for the inconvenient. I've also contacted Asus. The

isdn problem

2005-05-09 Thread muHum
hi! ive got a avm fritz card pci v1 and x86_64 linux installed but everytime i try to dial ippp0 there is an error like this: fcpcipnp0,ch0 cause E001B isdn_net: local hangup ippp0 ippp0: Chargesum is 0 i know that everything is configured well and the card works well under microshit

Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011

2005-05-09 Thread Joerg Rossdeutscher
Am Montag, den 09.05.2005, 19:12 + schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh): Le 09.05.2005 20:55:17, Joerg Rossdeutscher a écrit : And if your bios chipset is corrupt ,the main boot block of bios is damaged , Crazy. The problem is: Their bios breaks the nvidia drivers. And these guy

Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011

2005-05-09 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:30:38PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote: No, he quoted my mail, I just didn't post that very long part into the list. It just would make it even more ridiculous (I have an Asus K8V deluxe... What board do you have?) if grep Bios.*update.*problem inputdata; then

apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread David Wood
Now using deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib An upgrade wants to remove base-files and bash. Digging deeper, I see base-files is being removed because: base-files pre-depends on libc6 ( 2.3.2.dsl-20.0.1) I saw some traffic on the list that looked similar. But I don't

gcc4, thunderbird: emacs key bindings lost?

2005-05-09 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, Since the migration to gcc4 the Emacs key bindings in Thunderbird's compose window seem to be gone. Is this just me? Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: gcc4, thunderbird: emacs key bindings lost?

2005-05-09 Thread Javier Kohen
Hallo Harald, El lun, 09-05-2005 a las 23:02 +0200, Harald Dunkel escribi: Hi folks, Since the migration to gcc4 the Emacs key bindings in Thunderbird's compose window seem to be gone. Is this just me? I recall reading recently that having gtkspell installed caused the Emacs key bindings

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now using deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib An upgrade wants to remove base-files and bash. Digging deeper, I see base-files is being removed because: base-files pre-depends on libc6 ( 2.3.2.dsl-20.0.1) I saw some traffic on the

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread David Wood
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 23:21 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: And yet another person that hasn't been reading the ML for the last half year. Go fish. I know I'm ignorant and I screwed up, that much is obvious. But can I at least tell you what this looked like from my perspective? Is there

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread Martin Dickopp
David Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now using deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib An upgrade wants to remove base-files and bash. Digging deeper, I see base-files is being removed because: base-files pre-depends on libc6 ( 2.3.2.dsl-20.0.1) I saw some traffic on the

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread Javier Kohen
El lun, 09-05-2005 a las 18:51 -0400, David Wood escribi: On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 23:21 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: And yet another person that hasn't been reading the ML for the last half year. Go fish. I know I'm ignorant and I screwed up, that much is obvious. But can I at least

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:06:17PM -0300, Javier Kohen wrote: David, the problem is that this question was answered five to ten times in the last two weeks only; in fact, Goswin was the most patient of all and always gave an answer in-line instead of sending the poster to read the list.

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
David Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I'm guessing you guys tweaked the version numbering during the move? So I think I need to force myself to a different version of base-files and libc. We tweaked it about 4 month ago to get an unpached libc6 and base-files into sid amd64 and sarge

Re: glx for ia32 applications does not work

2005-05-09 Thread Javier Kohen
El mar, 10-05-2005 a las 01:22 +0200, Alexander Fieroch escribi: Marcin Dbicki wrote: A I remember Doom was the only game with this problem. I have juzt upgraded glibc and generated new cache for libs (also I didn't used chroot command itself to run Doom of course;)) No, I have the

Re: apt wants to remove bash, base-files; other move questions

2005-05-09 Thread David Wood
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 01:18 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: I just told you where to look. Nothing against you. The ML archive is full about this so everyone should be able to find it. The last big thread was when the new libc6 got uploaded. Nothing against you either! I just wanted to try

SSH package concerns...

2005-05-09 Thread Nathan Dragun
While setting up PAM in conjunction with SSH I included the following line to deny access unless found in the following file: authrequiredpam_listfile.so sense=allow onerr=fail item=user file=/etc/sshloginusers Which works, sort of. ...Lets say for examples sake the user bob is

Re: SSH package concerns...

2005-05-09 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Nathan Dragun said: While setting up PAM in conjunction with SSH I included the following line to deny access unless found in the following file: authrequiredpam_listfile.so sense=allow onerr=fail item=user file=/etc/sshloginusers Which works,

Re: SSH package concerns...

2005-05-09 Thread Adam Skutt
Nathan Dragun wrote: While setting up PAM in conjunction with SSH I included the following line to deny access unless found in the following file: authrequiredpam_listfile.so sense=allow onerr=fail item=user file=/etc/sshloginusers Which works, sort of. Don't use it. sshd(8)

Re: Octave

2005-05-09 Thread Steve Smith
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 23:33 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:02:41PM -0700, Attila Kocsis wrote: Hi, Does anybody know if any 64-bit Octave version exist? Thx Yes, it's avaiable. The source package, and the real binary pacakges are called octave2.1. However, I

Re: gcc4, thunderbird: emacs key bindings lost?

2005-05-09 Thread Harald Dunkel
Javier Kohen wrote: I recall reading recently that having gtkspell installed caused the Emacs key bindings to not work. Maybe this is the behavior you're experiencing; I don't recall those key bindings working for me on TB on pure64 (but I might be wrong, as I don't use TB anymore).