* Richard Mace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jun 05. 2006 22:27]:
> Now, when I type glxinfo I get the following output:
>
> $ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
> name of display: :0.0
> Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual
You seem to have been bitten by bug #364233
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Thanks Mark,
The nameserver setting was wrong. I changed my network a bit a few months
ago..:^)
Thanks,
Chris W.
> On 05 Jun 2006, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> > Recently, while trying to set up email configuration with OO 2.0, I was
> > reminded that I don't have network access from m
On 05 Jun 2006, Chris Wakefield wrote:
> Recently, while trying to set up email configuration with OO 2.0, I was
> reminded that I don't have network access from my chroot anymore.
>
> When originally I set it up, it had network access, I used to update &&
> upgrade the packages from time to ti
Greetings,
Recently, while trying to set up email configuration with OO 2.0, I was
reminded that I don't have network access from my chroot anymore.
When originally I set it up, it had network access, I used to update &&
upgrade the packages from time to time.
Does anyone have any idea why th
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:42:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:31:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:40:21PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> > > Like this:
>
> Deep in the middle of the xorg upgrade on my AMD-64 [running etch].
> Actua
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:07:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> More like 3.99Gb. The 2GB limit is the user/kernel split in linux. It
> can also be a 3+1 split. In 64bit kernels however the kernel memory is
> outside of the 32bit address space and except for the pages for the
> syscall call
Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:08:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> But you can mix the two. Use a 64bit kernel (yes, sarge does have
>> those in i386) while keeping your 32bit userland.
>>
>> That way you have all the stability of sarge i386 an
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:00:19 +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've a system with a software raid1 on 2 sata drive 80 GB
>>> I've all my system on LVM on this underlying raid.
>>>
>>> For performance
Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:00:19 +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've a system with a software raid1 on 2 sata drive 80 GB
>> I've all my system on LVM on this underlying raid.
>>
>> For performances reasons (video editing), I'm thinkin
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sent again to make clear my aim: having a pure 64bit once I can run the few
> applications I nedd (two in total) at 64bit, without having to reinstall the
> OS. What I am trying to avoid is to make the OS "less pure" by dealing the
> wrong way with
helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:05:09:38:40+0200] scribed:
>
>
>> Better don't mix sarge and etch. That can confuse apt.
>
>
> Where can I read up on the ramifications of this?
>
> On this very list, I was advised to use sarge to get kde
Cinelerra deb repositories changed a couple of weeks ago, due to many reasons
info in cinelerra.org still have wrong repositories address.
this is the right one:
deb http://giss.hackitectura.net/~vale/debian ./
& sorry if mirroring doesn't worked ;)
Vale
--
I recently upgraded to xorg 7.0 and am experiencing strange problems that seem
to be related to GLX (I think). I first noticed that playing back video
seemed choppy, with a perceptible pause at 5 second intervals that was not
there previously (xorg <= 6.9). I then tried some 3D apps and found th
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:42:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Deep in the middle of the xorg upgrade on my AMD-64. Actually, I'm
> probably only barely started.
>
> I went ahead and started to upgrade anyway. Following directions on
> the wiki page, I first upgraded x11-common, and was t
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:42:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I went ahead and started to upgrade anyway. Following directions on
> the wiki page, I first upgraded x11-common, and was told the upgrade
> failed; specifically because the symbolic link /usr/include/X11
> did not exist.
> This
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> the daily d-i images do not build for amd64, because of testing being in
> a pretty bad shape, many d-i copmponents are still missing.
> The last available daily image was built using the old, unofficial archive.
This no longer seems to be the case; I don't see any miss
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:31:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:40:21PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> > Like this:
>
> Late last night, when I was too tired to organise going to bed, I found
> this page, on migrating Xorg 6.9 to xorg 7.0.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/X
On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:00:19 +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a system with a software raid1 on 2 sata drive 80 GB
> I've all my system on LVM on this underlying raid.
>
> For performances reasons (video editing), I'm thinking if a RAID5.
>
> Is there somebody with some expe
Sent again to make clear my aim: having a pure 64bit once I can run the few
applications I nedd (two in total) at 64bit, without having to reinstall the
OS. What I am trying to avoid is to make the OS "less pure" by dealing the
wrong way with 32bit libraries and applications.
thanks again
france
On Monday 05 June 2006 09:59, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The only non-free packages
> avaiable are those the maintainer uploaded and Gerd Knorr hasn't done
> that for openmotif and amd64.
I posed this morning the question of OpenGL for 64bit to Gerd Knorr. However,
may I ask about the strategy
Hello there
I am running debian amd64 testing on a dual core athlon 64 x2 system. I
am using the system for audio work and have to use a version of libjack
that has been built from the clockfix branch of CVS in order to prevent
jackd from zombifying periodically. This branch is not to be included
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:42:46PM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> I have need to run a text only dos application on my debian box, does
> dosemu not exist on amd64 ? But I found dosbox - any one use this
> successfully
>
> Its a old pabx configuration program 8)
dosemu uses native cpu, so it pr
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:42:53AM -0400, Carl Brown wrote:
> I just switched my sources.list over to the new mirrors, using:
>
> deb ftp://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
> deb-src ftp://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>
> apt-get upgrade says:
>
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:08:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> But you can mix the two. Use a 64bit kernel (yes, sarge does have
> those in i386) while keeping your 32bit userland.
>
> That way you have all the stability of sarge i386 and the hardware
> support for >4GB ram of amd64 witho
Goswin wrote:
> From another thread here I gather this is reported and fixed in the
> next upload.
Hmmm, in the mean time I tried the dpkg --force-overwrite -i ... x11-common ...
approach.
It did lead to a finished dist-upgrade, but X is failing (xdm concludes
that the "server died").
The X ser
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:05:09:38:40+0200] scribed:
> Better don't mix sarge and etch. That can confuse apt.
Where can I read up on the ramifications of this?
On this very list, I was advised to use sarge to get kde onto my system.
My understanding of apt, preference
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I must confess that I was not aware that amd64 etch provides /lib32
> and /usr/lib32. However, I did no link, no export. Should any exist in my
> installation (tell me what to search and how) it is [a bug of] the system. I
> have reinstalled amd64
Toon Moene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>From another thread here I gather this is reported and fixed in the
next upload.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:04:08:22:41+0200] scribed:
>> helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > What do you think?
>>
>> I think you need to read more. Google a bit and read what errors and
>> warnings you get from commands.
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
