Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They were installed by default in my case. I carried out a net installation
> (mirror debian.inode.at) on multi-dual-opteron from
> etch beta2 release, downloaded 20 May
> 2006. It was raid1 with partitions /, /usr/, /var, swap, /tmp, with grub on
"Hemlock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> Seeking some advice on which filesystem to use.
> I've been primarlity an ext3 user, because thats all I've really
> ever known of, but would consider trying something else.
> Plus, never used anything other than 32bit Debian since slink.
>
> I've r
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 14:13, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> During apt-get update (and upgrade) I have noticed that also
> linux-image-2,6.15.1-amd64-generic
> and
> linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8,
> that I had initially installed, were affected.
>
> What about
> linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
> t
Thanks very much to all.
Art Edwards
helices wrote:
* "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:16:11:33:53-0600] scribed:
You can find where your particular files are with dpkg -L; for
instance on my system:
$ dpkg -L libxmu-dev | grep libXmu.a
/usr/lib/libXmu.a
Or, simpl
On 6/16/06, Hemlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Seeking some advice on which filesystem to use.
I've been primarlity an ext3 user, because thats all I've really
ever known of, but would consider trying something else.
Plus, never used anything other than 32bit Debian since slink.
I've read
Hello,
Seeking some advice on which filesystem to use.
I've been primarlity an ext3 user, because thats all I've really
ever known of, but would consider trying something else.
Plus, never used anything other than 32bit Debian since slink.
I've read some articles googling for xfs, ext3 and jfs and
* "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:16:11:33:53-0600] scribed:
> You can find where your particular files are with dpkg -L; for
> instance on my system:
>
> $ dpkg -L libxmu-dev | grep libXmu.a
> /usr/lib/libXmu.a
Or, simply:
$ dpkg -S libXmu.a
--
Best Regards,
helices
-
On Friday 16 June 2006 11:10, edwardsa wrote:
> I'm trying to compile Scilab from sources and it requires the two static
> libraries
> libXmu.a and LibXaw.a
>
> I have installed the packages libxmu-dev and libxaw7-dev, where these
> files are supposed to originate,. However, after installation they
I'm trying to compile Scilab from sources and it requires the two static
libraries
libXmu.a and LibXaw.a
I have installed the packages libxmu-dev and libxaw7-dev, where these
files are supposed to originate,. However, after installation they are
not in the /usr/X1R6/lib directory, where, accor
Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> What you actualy do need is gcc-3.4 + ia32-libs-dev on sarge and
>> libc6-dev-i386 on etch/sid.
>
> Right, I had ia32-libs-dev installed (I had a lot of try and guesses).
>
> Another point, I am using gcc-4.1 as defau
If this is a bug, it is more general. I get similar responses for other
font packages. Interestingly, however, the 75dpi fonts appear in
/usr/share/fonts/X11, with the one omission of the fonts.cache-1 file. I
will file a bug report, but I'm wondering whether there is a work around
that will al
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> What you actualy do need is gcc-3.4 + ia32-libs-dev on sarge and
> libc6-dev-i386 on etch/sid.
Right, I had ia32-libs-dev installed (I had a lot of try and guesses).
Another point, I am using gcc-4.1 as default. Is it mandatory to use
gcc-3,4 for this or is gcc-4.
Re-sent not to bothering you but because my message may have escaped
attention.
During apt-get update (and upgrade) of amd64 etch from official debian site I
noticed that also
linux-image-2,6.15.1-amd64-generic
and
linux-image-2,6.15-1-amd64-k8,
that I had initially installed, were affected (up
On Friday 16 June 2006 16:28, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This confirms that I was right in reserving the 64bit machine for 64bit
> > applications and the 32bit machine for 32bit applications. It is easy to
> > communicate between the two.
> >
> >
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This confirms that I was right in reserving the 64bit machine for 64bit
> applications and the 32bit machine for 32bit applications. It is easy to
> communicate between the two.
>
> Because the calculations at 64bit are long lasting, I use a usb ca
Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to compile a software in 32-bits mode on my AMD64.
>
> I installed the packages:
> o binutils-multiarch
irelevant
> o ia32-libs
irelevant
> o ... and all the packages related to these ones through the dependancies.
What you
16 matches
Mail list logo
