Sent again to inform that the kernel problem was resolved with
#apt-get --reinstall install linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
(need to get 0/15.4 MB of archives)
#aptitude shows the same kernels as below.
Although remedied, any guess at that failure?
Also, I am still curious about the large numbe
Thanks for the help. Unfortunately from that readme it still isn't
clear how to actual choose a different input method. But you pointed
me in the right direction - I found a wiki about scim
(http://www.scim-im.org/wiki/documentation) which in turn lead me to
finding out about scim-setup. I ran thi
On 7/8/06, Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And then...?
I found out I already had scim installed, and not scim-tables-ja. Both are
now installed. But I still don't understand how I am supposed to input
Japanese text. Is there some magic key combination to switch between English
and ka
On 7/8/06, LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
install scim + scim-tables-jaAnd then...?I found out I already had scim installed, and not scim-tables-ja. Both are now installed. But I still don't understand how I am supposed to input Japanese text. Is there some magic key combination to switch be
Hi,
Sorry if this is off topic - I have been searching for an answer
unsuccessfully for a couple days.
I have been trying to get my computer set up to use Japanese. I have
read through several web pages and installed a lot of suggested
software with apt-get. (Can't remember all of it anymore.) N
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:45:58PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Same here. However, not everyone thinks the same way.
Yeah I know. Microsoft Office users for example. :)
tar I understand (although there are a lot of different implementations
of it too).
Raimund,
Before playing with Memory Hole and MTRR settings in your BIOS setup,
I strongly suggest to update your BIOS to the latest version.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2006/06/msg00344.html
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:45:58PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Same here. However, not everyone thinks the same way.
Yeah I know. Microsoft Office users for example. :)
tar I understand (although there are a lot of different implementations
of it too). Zip works too for some things.
I
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:22:52PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>Yes, and neither works particularly well, if at all, with archives that
>>use the latest version of the rar format.
>
>
> Well I won't use rar for my own data. I like my data in documented
> format
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:22:52PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Yes, and neither works particularly well, if at all, with archives that
> use the latest version of the rar format.
Well I won't use rar for my own data. I like my data in documented
formats.
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
A J Stiles wrote:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 11:59, Marko Gabud wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have notticed that there is no unrar package in official repositories
>>for amd64. Is there any unofficial repository or is there a way to install
>>official packet for i386?
>
>
> Try unrar-free or p7zip inst
#aptitude
shows
i linux-image-2.6-amd64-generic
i linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp
i linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-generic
i linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
and no brpken packages are indicated.
I was use to start
i linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
before the problem below.
__
Boot
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Hi Len, * !
>>question is: where is my memory ?! it's too much to be a miscalculation
>>of some form (like the HDD manufacturers do it :) could anyone make
>>sense of my BIOS-provided physical RAM map if i posted it? what am i
>>missing?
>
>
> There is usually a memory h
Booting Debian GNU Linux kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp root (hd0,0)
Filesystem reiserfs, partition 0xfd
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp root -/dev/md0 ro single
Error 13: invalid or unsupported executable found
Press any key...
Same error trying in recovery mode.
It starts with the o
There is actually newer source available.
http://files.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-3.6.6.tar.gz
I guess I should upgrade.
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:59:47 -0500
Michael Langley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just google for unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz and build your own 64bit unrar bin.
>
> unrar: ELF 64-bit L
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:25:26AM +0200, Raimund Jacob wrote:
> i upgraded the RAM of my workstation yesterday and have some problems
> understanding what i'm seeing.
>
> here is what i did: started with 4 GB of RAM, made up from 4x1GB
> registered non-ECC modules. all working well. ripped apart
Just google for unrarsrc-3.5.4.tar.gz and build your own 64bit unrar bin.
unrar: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux
2.6.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, stripped
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
Marko Gabud <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:26:39PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > mons wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> I want to compile a kernel for my other computer. I have a ia32 chrooted
> >> enviroment. I tried to compile it but when I do make menuconfig i
> >> a
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:41:24PM +0200, Michal Hajek wrote:
> Hello...
>
> :) well, this is what I have done a moment before :)
> I downloaded the .deb file from:
> http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia/dists/unstable/nvidia-graphics-drivers/binary-amd64/
>
> than I ran as root:
>
> # dpkg
Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi amd64 folks,
>
> the speedy-cgi-perl package in sarge/amd64 needs a recompile. As reported
> in #326201 and #374258, it was compiled against libperl 5.8.4-1, which
> had a DynaLoader compatibility problem (#247291) reverted in 5.8.4-2.
>
> As a result of
Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mons wrote:
>> Hi.
>> I want to compile a kernel for my other computer. I have a ia32 chrooted
>> enviroment. I tried to compile it but when I do make menuconfig i
>> allways have to choose only ia64 kernels.
I highly doubt that. ia64 is not amd64 but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2006 12:59 PM, Marko Gabud wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have notticed that there is no unrar package in official repositories
> for amd64. Is there any unofficial repository or is there a way to
> install official packet for i386?
>
> Marko
There
Hi!
I have solved my problems by reinstaling
nvidia-kernel-source_1.0.8756-3_amd64.deb and
nvidia-glx_1.0.8756-3_amd64.deb.
Everything runs smoothly now :)
Thank you!
Best regards
Michal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Friday 07 July 2006 11:59, Marko Gabud wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have notticed that there is no unrar package in official repositories
> for amd64. Is there any unofficial repository or is there a way to install
> official packet for i386?
Try unrar-free or p7zip instead. Both are Free Software al
Marko Gabud wrote:
Hello,
I have notticed that there is no unrar package in official
repositories for amd64. Is there any unofficial repository or is there
a way to install official packet for i386?
Marko
"unrar" is a non-free package. As it's non-free, it's not built
automatically. You
Hello,
I have notticed that there is no unrar package in official repositories
for amd64. Is there any unofficial repository or is there a way to install
official packet for i386?
Marko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Hello...
:) well, this is what I have done a moment before :)
I downloaded the .deb file from:
http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia/dists/unstable/nvidia-graphics-drivers/binary-amd64/
than I ran as root:
# dpkg -i nvidia-glx_1.0.8178-3_amd64.deb
Selecting previously deselected package nvid
Michal Hajek wrote:
Hello,
* Jo Shields ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060707 11:42]:
Xorg7 requires nvidia-glx 1.0.8178-3 (or higher), or nvidia-glx-legacy
1.0.7174-3 (or higher)
aha... I see! Thank you :) This clears the matter a lot.
My aptitude shows nvidia-glx version 1.0.8178-1. I tho
Hello,
* Jo Shields ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060707 11:42]:
> Xorg7 requires nvidia-glx 1.0.8178-3 (or higher), or nvidia-glx-legacy
> 1.0.7174-3 (or higher)
aha... I see! Thank you :) This clears the matter a lot.
My aptitude shows nvidia-glx version 1.0.8178-1. I thought the
deb http://peopl
Hi amd64 folks,
the speedy-cgi-perl package in sarge/amd64 needs a recompile. As reported
in #326201 and #374258, it was compiled against libperl 5.8.4-1, which
had a DynaLoader compatibility problem (#247291) reverted in 5.8.4-2.
As a result of this the sarge/amd64 package is unusable. Other arc
You don't state which version of nvidia-glx you're trying to use.
Xorg7 requires nvidia-glx 1.0.8178-3 (or higher), or nvidia-glx-legacy
1.0.7174-3 (or higher)
Michal Hajek wrote:
Hello :)
I have debian testing and I have upgraded more or less successfully to
xorg 7.0. If I use X window wi
Hello :)
I have debian testing and I have upgraded more or less successfully to
xorg 7.0. If I use X window with "nv" driver, everything seems to work
well. There is one problem though.
In order to enjoy nvidia accelerated graphics, I need to build nvidia
kernel module and also install nvidia
Hello *,
i upgraded the RAM of my workstation yesterday and have some problems
understanding what i'm seeing.
here is what i did: started with 4 GB of RAM, made up from 4x1GB
registered non-ECC modules. all working well. ripped apart a new server
that came with 2x2GB registered ECC modules (also
33 matches
Mail list logo
