helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:04:08:22:41+0200] scribed:
>> helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > What do you think?
>>
>> I think you need to read more. Google a bit and
Ronny Adsetts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow said at 03/06/2006 20:02:
>> Ronny Adsetts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 06 May 2006 16:47:43 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pending the
helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do you think?
I think you need to read more. Google a bit and read what errors and
warnings you get from commands.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandru Cardaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All!
>
> It seems I have solved the problem.
>
> # dpkg --force-overwrite -i
> /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_1%3a7.0.20_amd64.deb
>
> After that the upgrade proceeded fine and everything seems to work now!
>
> # ls -l /usr/X11R6/
> total 4
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin:
> I did not install ia32. However, looking at the sources.list and commented
> lines, I fear I did a big mistake:
>
> I have a commeted line
>
> # deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
> and corresponding deb-src
>
Ronny Adsetts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 06 May 2006 16:47:43 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>>
>> Pending the amd64 R2 release. Any day now [tm].
>
> Is there any estimation of when this might happen?
>
> Tha
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As to amd64 debian etch OS (no IA32, no 32 chroot) I was examining what
> happens on trying to launch there a scientific application in OpenGL that I
> use on debian etch 32 and have to transfer to 64. The application directory
> has self contained
"Dean Hamstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
>
> as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
> and 64bit is by no means new ground for the linux kernel.
>
> for example, you shouldnt see any 64bit specifi
Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote:
>> Yes, I have read it that I can use maximum 64Gb memory using PAE. But lot of
>> people wrote that 10-15% CPU time need for this. Is it true? Uptime
>> is very critical :) that is why
"Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> in earlier days apt-get dist-upgrade did automatically upgrade the kernel,
> too.
No, never. Nothing has changed there.
There are different kernel packages, those with the full version in
the name and those with only a partial versi
"Lin Shao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> When I do "apt-get install xserver-xorg", I got these error messages:
>
> xserver-xorg: Depends: xserver-common (>=6.9.0.dfsg.1-6+b1) but
> 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 is to be installed
>
> Is the latest xserver-common package not available for etch/am
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello
>
> I have a box with :
>
> - AMD64 debian Arch
> - Kernel 2.6.8
>
> installed from
>
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main contrib
> non-free
> deb http
Alexander Sieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
..
> I wonder if the error is on my system or on the mirror.
> ftp://ftp.at.deb
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got a solution: First I deleted /emul completeley, then unpacked the
> package
> manually, then made a new symlink /lib32 to /emul/ia32-libs/lib.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S /lib32
libc6-i386: /lib32
That is not part of ia32-libs. What problem did you hav
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 10:11 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
>> "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Hi all !
>> >
>> > I have got some problems to install the newest version of ia32-
"Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all !
>
> I have got some problems to install the newest version of ia32-libs.
>
> Please look here:
>
> orbereiten zum Ersetzen von ia32-libs 1.11
> (durch .../ia32-libs_1.12_amd64.deb) ...
> new preinst: upgrade 1.11
> Entpacke Ersatz für ia32-
Koen Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:07 +0200, Koen Vermeer wrote:
>> OK, I'll try that. I just delayed messing with it after I saw some
>> people reporting problems. I'll replace my old deb-line with the new
>> one, and sew what happens...
>
> My apologies for that
Gleidson Echeli Leopoldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jo Shields wrote:
>> Anything different, especially containing "debian-amd64" is *NOT* Debian.
>>
>
> But stable/sarge is ftp.XX.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ RELEASE
> main contrib non-free
Which is not Debian.
MfG
Goswin
--
To
Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:30:16 +0200, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>> Anything
>> different, especially containing "debian-amd64" is *NOT* Debian.
>
> Not anymore, at least.
Never was. debian-amd64 was always the inofficial archive.
MfG
Goswin
--
To
Koen Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 09:34 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> >For etch to have
>> >all amd64 packages every package has to migrate to etch. That just
>> >takes time.
>> And if packages happen to have RC bugs, then that takes an even longer
>> time. ;
Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> In the last few days, I was struggling to convert a remote machine
>>> with two identical SATA disks (sda and sdb) to a Software RAID
>&g
Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> 5. Copy the existing Debian system to the new RAID
>>>
>>> $ mkdir -p /mnt/newroot
>>> $ mount /dev/md0 /mnt/n
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>>For etch to have
>>all amd64 packages every package has to migrate to etch. That just
>>takes time.
>>
>>
>>
> And if packages happen to have RC bugs, then tha
"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've a system with a software raid1 on 2 sata drive 80 GB
> I've all my system on LVM on this underlying raid.
>
> For performances reasons (video editing), I'm thinking if a RAID5.
>
> Is there somebody with some experience with raid
Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the last few days, I was struggling to convert a remote machine
> with two identical SATA disks (sda and sdb) to a Software RAID
> 1. Especially the boot-part was tricky as I had no console access to
> the machine. The whole procedure was done remotely via S
Gleidson Echeli Leopoldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander Samad wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 08:28:04AM -0300, Gleidson Echeli Leopoldo wrote:
>> any reason its debian.net and not debian.org ?
>>
>
> security.debian.org haven't security updates for etch amd64
The Release file claims i
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Len:
>
> Apparently amd64 debian testing has been successfully installed on many
> computers. Because this is a rapidly moving sector of debian - attended by
> the risk of damaging successful installations during update or package
> search - may
Alexander Vlasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
>
> I've just received a new server on amd64 (em64t) platform and tried to
> install sarge.
> Unfortunately, hardware is hardly supported by sarge, so I dist-upgraded
> to etch immediately after install.
>
> But now I faced the strange problem
Sam Varghese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:20:11PM -0400 Gregory B. Prokopsky said:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> My lab got shiny dual core AMD64 machines and I am trying to install Debian
>> port for AMD64 on them with netinst images.
>>
>> * I tried Sarge CD, it booted, but key
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:19:57AM +0100, Birju Prajapati wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to track down security updates for etch on AMD64 for my
>> sources.list.
>> The following entry does not seem to work:
>> deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updat
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about efficiency (speed and subtraction of cpu) and reliability (of
> booting from the intact disk should the other one fail) of raid1 provided by
> the mainboard Tyan K8WE S2895? It could be simply set from bios and thus ease
> life. Any comp
"antonio giulio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> the chroot is only a directory and could be removed as usually, ...
>> >
>> > sorry misunderstanding for my bad english:)
>> >
>> > is it possible run firefox32 and wine32 by "lib32"-package?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Giulio
>>
>> firefox I believe n
"antonio giulio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> the chroot is only a directory and could be removed as usually, ...
>
> sorry misunderstanding for my bad english:)
>
> is it possible run firefox32 and wine32 by "lib32"-package?
>
> Thanks,
> Giulio
firefox I believe not yet. wine yes.
MfG
A J Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I partition my drive appropriately, can I use LILO to dual-boot a 32-bit
> kernel and a 64-bit kernel with {at least} a shared /home and swap space,
> but separate / partitions?
>
> I think it should be possible, this way, to keep all the nasty binar
Karl Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK - this is rather strange.
>
> There are iso downloads at :
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
This is just the general overview page and links isos from other places.
> and at
>
> http://amd64.debian.net/debian/dists/testing/main/insta
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Craig:
>
> I decided to follow your 2nd suggestion (for a non expert like me) to install
> permanently ubuntu 5.10, albeit with much regret because I had always loved
> the debian environment, people in the first place. I downloaded the ubuntu
>
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I forgot a key point: my move to 64 is essentially to double the floating
> point for the package mpqc, which i use on 32 but it is available as a debian
> package for the testing. To write papers, sending mail or navigating on
> internet i would h
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all:
> I have followed with particular attention in the last few days all issues on
> this list related to amd64 debian installation. Just because I have now
> finally everything ready for a fresh installation on a fresh ready
> workstation equi
"Fernando J. Rodríguez (Herr Groucho)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
> I upgraded my IA32 system's CPU running Debian Etch with an Ahlon64
> processor.
> After tracking the current state of affairs of amd64 on Debian, I
> concluded it is not worth the trouble of reinstalling the operating
>
Alexander Sieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is, also after changing sda to sdb in device.map, the
> two MBRs are not identical.
>
> Maybe Goswin, or somebody else who enabled booting from both
> disks with RAID1 and grub, can give the output of
> 'dd if=xxx[ab] bs=512 count=1 | od' on their
Alexander Sieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After running 'grub-install' on /dev/sdb, both MBRs, on /dev/sda
> and /dev/sdb, contain the right data.
Some data but the right data? The two MBRs should be identical or not?
Have you tried removing sda and boot or swap sda and sdb around and
boot? (
Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [...]
>>>> I went ahead and fixed mbr up for amd64. Apart from the obvious
>>>> (Bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:29:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> You have to trick grub-install. Say /boot is on /dev/md0, a raid1 of
>> /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1. Then you can put /dev/sda1 into devices.map,
>> instal-
Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> tag 330190 + patch
>> thanks
>> Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to set up a software RAID 1 (two disks) with Debian on
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> I'm not suggesting splitting the dirs. Just the way the link is setup.
>>
>> I'm suggesting creating it in the maintainer scripts instead of the
>> data.tar.gz so packages that do ship files in (/usr)/lib64 don't make
>> libc6 unupgradable.
>
Graham Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin,
>
> Are you accepting requests for more libs to be included in the libc6-i386
> package? Should I submit a bug report or something?
>
> The particular libraries I am looking for (at the moment) are:
>
> libssl.so.0.9.8
> libcrypto.so.0.9.8
>
> Gr
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:29:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> You have to trick grub-install. Say /boot is on /dev/md0, a raid1 of
>> /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1. Then you can put /dev/sda1 into devices.map,
>> ins
"Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
> I had slight problems to upgrade to libc6-2.3.6-8 as this package did not
> want
> to install. Hereby I have a slight understanding problem. Can someone
> explain, what now is the correct way ?
>
> Short description:
>
> I have a chro
"Dmitry I. Kulagin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
> I use ms-sys with "-s" option just a week ago in simular situation.
> As far as I know, you can't indicate grub to load from /dev/md0, only
> lilo can do this.
> And there is no need to recompile the kernel, the debian distributed
> kernel wi
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Aurelien,
>
> On 06-May-19 04:15, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> [Ccing: amd64 and dpkg developers as they are concerned by this subject]
>> Currently the (/usr)/lib64 -> /lib symlink is shipped in the libc6
>> pac
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently the (/usr)/lib64 -> /lib symlink is shipped in the libc6
> package. Goswin von Brederlow asked for this link to be created in the
> postinst instead, so that packages could install files in both
> (/usr)/lib and (/u
has type 'char *'
+ * Enable testsuite partialy
++ remove tests for non existing old mbrs
++ conditionaly remove runtime test that fail on amd64
+ * Fix typo in manpage found by A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #311235)
+
+ -- Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
listrcv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> when unloading and reloading SCSI modules, the number of SCSI hosts is
> increased like this:
Also happens on usb every time you unplug and replug a harddisk. Very
anoying.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Alexander Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> sorry if this email is a bit off topic, but still enough to ask I think.
>
> What is the status of multiarch and debian (specifically amd64 port).
>
> I like lots of other users have migrated to amd64, I am finding it a
> bit of a pain to get s
Alexander Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 08:57:53PM -0700, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
>> Matthieu Helleboid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've made an update to amd64-archive ma
"Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
> I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as a
> kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most commercial
> programs I
Mickael Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I find quite strange that amd64 still has not the newly libc6 (3.1r2) that was
> patched for an amd64 bug, any reason why we still don't have it in
> sarge-amd64 ?
>
> on i386 sarge that is 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3
> on amd64 I only have : 2.3.
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do I have to download libstdc++ manually? Or do I have to set a link
>> somewhere for that? It's all a little bit confusing to me with this
>> chroot...
>
> Or can I just use your solution with the amd64-archive in any way? I
> only wanted to use the chroot for
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I did it, like described here:
>> > https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id271960
>> >
>> > But
>> > debootstrap --arch i386 sid /var/chroot/sid-ia32
>> > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
>>
>> Try it with sarge and then
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> today I tried to install a chroot on my amd64-machine, but it failed...
>
> I did it, like described here:
> https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id271960
>
> But
> debootstrap --arch i386 sid /var/chroot/sid-ia32 h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well, I removed the old entries. The problem is clearly introduced by the new
> entries.
>
> Interestingly, although the packages provided by Sarge and Etch should
> theoretically be the same, they behave differently. I tried this with diff,
> which is one of the abo
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> Why do you reply to an old mail that has nothing to with your problem?
>>
>
> Sorry, I don't know how this happened.
>
>>>
>>> Would it b
aptitude keeps repeating the request to reinstall with every
>> run!
>
> OK, this is also my situation. I've been working on it with Goswin von
> Brederlow in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=351056, but we
> haven't gotten to the bottom of it yet.
An
download the package and look at the
changelog contained within. That is what it is for.
ia32-libs (1.9) unstable; urgency=low
[ Frederik Schüler ]
* Depend on lib32asound2 instead of shipping libasound2.
* Include libxv1. Closes: #364061
[ Goswin von Brederlow ]
* fetch-and-buil
Lubos Vrbka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi guys,
>
> suddenly i have problems with my amd64 system when trying to run
> applications from my i386 chroot using dchroot. they just fail to run.
>
> strace gives me
>
> clone(dchroot: chroot: Operation not permitted
> child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_
Jonathan Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Corey Hickey wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Kaye wrote:
>>> For the past 6 or 7 days, updating amd64 sid has produced no new upgrades
>>> which seems a bit unusual. I'm using
>>> deb http://ftp.es.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
>>> in my sources.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Hi,
>> >>
&
Hi,
I've been working on wrappers for apt and dpkg-deb to get some
resemblance of multiarch that can still make it for etch. The first
thing I made to work is installing amd64 kernels on i386 and anyone
interested is welcome to try a very alpha release:
ftp://mrvn.homeip.net/apt-get-multiarch/
B
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> some days ago I had to reinstall my system, and I chose debian sarge to
> install on it. Now, I liked to have more recent packages on my machine,
> like I had before.
>
> I tried a 'apt-get dist-upgrade' but this wants me to uninstall nearly
> my who
"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le 23.04.2006 16:03:37, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> This also have no effect on -fPIC. That MUST be set on al
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bzip2: Compressed file ends unexpectedly;
> perhaps it is corrupted? *Possible* reason follows.
> bzip2: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> Input file = (stdin), output file = (stdout)
Yeah, that should be. Maybe you tried in the middle of a mirr
"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This also have no effect on -fPIC. That MUST be set on all
>> architectures for shared libraries. So any check of DEB_HOST_ARCH
>> would be a bug.
>
> Why a bug, I can set CFLAGS according to the architecture (what I do
> with cinelerra -
"Robert Hulme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could someone please please please help me? :-) I posted this to
> debian-user but I get the feeling it's actually an amd64 problem.
>
> I've spent about 8 hours on this now and it's causing me to pull my
> hair out. Googling seems to largely reveal a f
Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In light of the recent announcement "The Future of AMD64 Port" on this
> list, I have attempted
> to update my sources.list file for Apt. I have attached the file for
> reference. I have tried various
But then you have only the old mirror in there and the
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Goswin:
>
> i use deabian testing on my pc and i am going to install debian-amd64 on a
> workstation for quantum mechanical calculations (a couple of dual opternos on
> a tyan k8we), as soon as i have built it (a week or so). you know what i
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:12:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Try
>>
>> deb http://amd64..mirrors.debian.net/debian sid main contrib non-free
sorry, this actualy needs to be
deb http://.amd64.mirror.debian.net/debian sid main contrib
"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'use to build debian packages from the svn releases of cinelerra and
> several other ones.
>
> With debuild from devscripts 2.9.16 everything is fine but with 2.9.17
> I got the following error the traditionnal "recompile with -f
Hi,
as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missing
/debian/pool/main/f/firefox/firefox_1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2.orig.tar.gz
The missing file has a sideeffect for the debian-amd64 archive because
the sync-script detects an inconsistency and stops. Since it goes
alphabeticaly and package after f
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> fredag 21 april 2006 04:17 skrev Stephen Woodbridge:
>> Ok, I'm drawing a blank, where do I find a list of the main mirrors.
>>
>> So I have sarge/stable pointing at the debian-amd64 mirrors, is this
>> correct?
>>
>> And I don't reference te
Niclas Wahlgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What to do about this:
>
> debian-black:/home/nw# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
> amarok ...
> .
> .
> .
> ...xterm
> The following packages will be up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:51:26PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> That really shouldn't matter. The RAID superblocks for all RAID levels
>> contain a UUID for a reason.
>>
>> With
>> DEVICE partitions
>> in /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf, mdadm will
Try
deb http://amd64..mirrors.debian.net/debian sid main contrib non-free
etch still needs time for packages to drift into it from the official
sid. It will be some more weeks/month before that populated enough to
be usable.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Goswin and friends -
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> You might want to try --force-overwrite.
>
> That option is not documented in my apt-get man page.
Because it is an option for dpkg.
>&
Igor TAmara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I restarted my pc, and the configuration continued without any
> problems, it's weird :(
>
> Igor> Hi, I did apt-get update , apt-get upgrade on etch, but the debconf
> Igor> postinstall doesn't continue...
> Igor> D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/inf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater) writes:
> The installer for Etch currently requires a valid mirror address in
> order to install, even if you are installing off CD/DVD.
>
> I can't work out how to freak a standard Debian mirror to appear to
> provide the appropriate mirror.
>
> This is for a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Friends -
>
> I can't find my way to fix my half-upgraded libc6 on amd64 sid,
> caused by bug #362058. I have apt-get pointed to
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
> so I now have libc6{,-dev}_2.3.6-7 and uml-utilities_20060323-3
> ready to install.
"Marc D. Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still not sure what caused the problem, but it ran fine on another
> server with a single processor.
>
> Thing to note, when I run dpkg-architecture on my Ubuntu Desktop
> (64bit), or the single (opteron) processor server, it returns the
> correc
"Noah Dain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Apparently etch is to be released by the end of this year (2006), or
> at least that is the current target.
>
> Problem for me is, I have to set up a server to host several
> virtualised environments. I _was_ planning on using amd64 sarge as
> debian typi
"Marc D. Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Java 1.5 on my Debian Sarge AMD64 Server.
> `uname -a` gives :
> Linux jupiter 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8-smp #1 SMP Sun Oct 2 23:21:12 CEST 2005
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I've downloaded jdk-1_5_0_06-linux-amd64.bin from Sun, used
Thomas Alexander Frederiksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> I've run into an issue of ProFTPd segfaulting whenever mod_delay kicks
> in, but as it was on a critical production server, I've had no chance of
> doing any serious debugging. We had to get it back up ASAP, and that
> meant revert
Uro¹ Golja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any ideas?
Change the cable, use a different port on the switch. Check the error
counter in ifconfig.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Can we list the amd64.debian.net mirrors as sarge only and the debian
>> mirrors as etch/sid? Not sure if the Master file had that info.
>
> The sarge installer contains a copy (or 2) of the
"Edward Guldemond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When running unstable on my amd64 system, I am encountering problems
> upgrading five packages. The packages with the problems are docker,
> libbonobo2-0, libgtk2.0-bin, libselinux1, and openntpd. After
> upgrading them, they stay in the list of p
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:47:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>> (Please CC me, I forget if I'm subscribed.)
>>
>> At what point should Mirrors.masterlist be updated to remove the
>> amd64.debian.net mirrors and stop listing all the main mirror network as
>>
"A.E.Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the last two weeks or so, I have trouble in using debmirror on the
> sarge section of the amd.debian.net mirrors. The same thing has happened
> on etch now and again, but that seems just to be a temporary problem of
> mirrors updating. The sarge pro
"Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 4/8/06, Jason Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > My first experience with debian, and amd64. Can someone tell me
>> > what packages I need to cross compile 32 bit apps? I've tried for
>> > awhile, but I just can't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:09:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> "A.E.Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >>> 4. Install testing (etch) Debian which supposedly has internal
>> >>> amd64 su
"A.E.Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> 4. Install testing (etch) Debian which supposedly has internal
>>> amd64 support. Can DVDs/CDs be found?
>>
>>
>> No DVD/CDs for testing. Netinstall cds exist, which can grab actual
>> needed packages from internet. Discs are usually only made n
Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Options considered:
>>1. Live CD Knoppix v4.0.2 provides a hd-installer, but some Knoppers say if
>>you are going to install Debian anyway, you are better off doing a straight
>>Debian install. Moreover Live Knoppix detects neit
301 - 400 of 1213 matches
Mail list logo
