Alois Zoitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hallo,
>
> whats the easiest way to downgrade from gcc3.4 to standard
> amd64?
Wait a bit longer and upgrade to sid being gcc-4.0. Thats the only way
that won't have big pitfals.
> or what is the best archieve to use when trying the gcc3.4 branch.
If yo
Alexander Jede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi list,
> I wanted to install gnomebaker on my etch (testing) platform.
> That for I have to install cdrdao, but I can't find it in the testing
> nor in the unstable tree.
> Where can I get cdrdao for debian?
> thanks alex
Look for the bugreport in th
"Joost Kraaijeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a working boot.img.gz for installing Debian AMD64 with an USB stick
> available?
>
> I found one on the Internet (from early june from looking at the timestamp)
> but that one, if used in the rescue mode, stops while setting
kohzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it's just that i m about to install a debian etch on a amd64 with for
> exemple samba, and i would like to know if there is a existing samba
> amd64 package or if i will have to chroot it.
>
> thx
And another thing:
http://packages.debian.org/samba
MfG
kohzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it's just that i m about to install a debian etch on a amd64 with for
> exemple samba, and i would like to know if there is a existing samba
> amd64 package or if i will have to chroot it.
Don't use etch, use sarge.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% apt-cache show samba
P
kohzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi all
> I would like to know here can i find a list of application witch need to
> be chrooted (non 64bits appz) under debian amd64.
> thx
All and none both at the same time. All 32bit apps need special
treatment but chroot is just one way to treat them.
MfG
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Levi Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 22:18]:
>> Package: eAthena/chroot
>> Version: (unknown)
>>
>> When I type make sql within my eAthena folder I encounter these warnings.
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `
Tobias Prousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thanks for the hint, but could you please be a little bit more verbose. I
> just
> don't get it, sry
>
> Thanks, Tobi
>
> On Friday 29 July 2005 13:44, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Tobias Prousa <[EMAIL PROT
Tobias Prousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem compiling v0.1.1 of hac4linux
> ( http://hac4linux.sourceforge.net/ ) on debian amd64 sid.
> I never had a problem compiling it on debian i386 (woody/sarge/sid), so I
> thought this might be the right place to ask.
>
> ./config
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the line:
>
> deb http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/debian-amd64/debian/ unstable main
> contrib
>
> When I update, it appears to fetch the release file but skip the
> packages file. If I can change unstable to sid, it works.
> (But si
Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> / /var/chroot/sarge-ia32/var/chroot/sarge-amd64 none bind 0 0
>
> Is there a limit to the depth of chroots?
>
> Matthias
Path length are somewhat limited by P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2 week ago I tried also to install a DVD of Sarge release
>
> - if I type "linux"...it install kernel 2.4-i386
> - if I type "expert" I can choose kernel 2.6-AMD64
>but in this case is not possible the first reboot; the message is
> pivot_root failed
> dev/co
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>I can't boot the Net instal CD
>
>>> kernel panic: VFS unable to mount foor fs on
>>
>>Which image is doing this?
>>
>
> 2005-07-21
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/amd64/20050721/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> Antonio
Try the sarge
Lubos Vrbka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can anybody give me a hint? As I understand is my 32bit chroot on 64's
>> /var/chroot/sarge-ia32, so 64 directories are outside the 32bit tree.
>> How do I mount them inside 32?
> use a bind mount - put something like the following to your fstab...
> /hom
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello !
> Whenenver I try to install openoffice using apt, apt tells me missing
> dependencies. Always apt wants to install a package named openoffice.org-bin.
> I searched, but I did not find the package at all. And it seems to be neither
> a meta-package. Wh
Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I notice that cvsup isn't in the Debian amd64 distro yet. Is there a
> place where I can find out why? I'm trying to decide if it's a problem
> that I may be able to solve and contribute back, or if it's just totally
> impossible and I should spend the
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello !
>
> Did I miss something ? All the packages in main are gone. Only the packages
> in
> non-free are there.
>
> This is my last known entry in sources.list:
>
> deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sid main contrib
> non-free
> deb-sr
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2005 m. Liepos 24 d., Sekmadienis 02:15, Goswin von Brederlow raðë:
>> Those aren't realy security updates. They are identical content wise
>> and fix the bugs but they are not build by the security team before a
>>
Robert Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shouldn't the current URL ( deb
> http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sarge-proposed-updates
> main contrib non-free
> ) for Sarge-amd64 security updates be added to the
> howto?
>
> If for no other reason than to show to the public at
> large that there ARE
Dirk Salva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> if in about two or three years security-support for Sarge-AMD_64 will
> work, what will be the correct URL?
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ sarge/updates main contrib
> non-free
>
> This one is wrong anyway...
>
> ciao, Dirk
No,
fernando tear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello:
>
> I'm looking for a good debian distro to install in my
> new AMD 64 and i would like you suggest my best
> choise.
>
> thanks...
I think Debian is the best Debian distro. No question.
Unless you want to try some non Debian amd64 linux you don
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> apt-get install debian-cd
>>
>> I configure the CONF.sh for normal CD builds, setting the path and
>> such and then override a few things for netinst (see belo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:35:14PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>> > It was accepted into unstable today, should be autobuilt tonight,
>> > and become available tomorrow during th
antongiulio05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I'm trying to burn a backup dvd of partition or single file in cd, but
>> > I got permission /dev/sg0 denied.
>>
>> Do you realy have a scsi dvd burner?
>>
>> If not kick the ide-scsi and use dev=ATA:
>
> No, I have not scsi dvd burner. I have teste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:24:18AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> apt-get install debian-cd
>>
>> I configure the CONF.sh for normal CD builds, setting the path and
>> such and then override a few th
antonio giulio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to burn a backup dvd of partition or single file in cd, but
> I got permission /dev/sg0 denied.
Do you realy have a scsi dvd burner?
If not kick the ide-scsi and use dev=ATA:
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 11:59, Jo Shields wrote:
>> I've personally had no difficulty whatsoever with VMware 5 natively on
>> AMD64 Debian, including the building of kernel modules. Is your kernel
>> built with the same version of GCC as "gcc -v" reports
Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philipp Winkler wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> I´ve got a sid pur64 on my machine.
>> Every some day (has ben twice now) the 32bit apps won´t run.
>> Failures are "... file not found"
>
> Check /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> It should be a symlink to $IA32_PATH/lib/ld-linux.so.2
>
>
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
>>> It was accepted into unstable today, should be autobuilt tonight,
>>> and become available tomorrow during the day as mirrors sync.
Hugo Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:53:15AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> Grub is WAY more flexible and friendly, and doesn't go broken on
>> upgrades just because you forget to run that stupid lilo command to
>> update the block map.
>>
>> I have certainly had
Pavel Jurus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry to say that if you have security concerns, the whole amd64
> port is not acceptable so far :( It is more than one month after the
> release of amd64 stable, and security support is still lacking. Moreover
> http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ is f
antongiulio05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> dpkg --purge nerolinux
>
> Thanks, it works.
>
> Curiosity: no presence of nero package in 'apt' could be considered a bug for
> apt?
>
> Giulio
Yes, sounds like one.
On the other hand, --force-architecture is very evil.
MfG
Goswin
--
To
antongiulio05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > too, but it returns other packages.
>> > How can I remove it?
>>
>> Try `dpkg -S /usr/bin/nero`
>> to find out what package it belongs.
>
> I already have tried it (sorry I've not reported it in prev email):
>
> # dpkg -S /usr/bin/nero
> nerolinux: /
Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> I have a number of i32 lib directories listed in /etc/ld.so.conf that allows
> to run 32bit application directly.
> But when I do so, some locale-sensitive application report errors like
>
> I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "C"
>...
> What'
Mark Nipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm surprised cdimage.debian.org is even serving those
> files properly. I didn't think Apache (<2.1 anyway) would serve
> out large files. At least my experience with 2.0.x would suggest
> otherwise.
Probably a 64bit cpu under it.
MfG
Go
Gregory Margo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> For 2.6.8 amd64 still has its own kernel-image source and that might
>> have some extra patches in it. to fix this issue.
>>
>> I dont
GOMBAS Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
>
>> I think staying with testing is the best thing to do for
>> non-developers anyways.
>
> Has the problem of security updates been solved for testing? If not,
> using testing is worse tha
Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You can recompile the nvidia-glx yourself too if that is the only
>> problem you hit in sid. But if you aren't sure about that, then
>> staying with etch t
Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:51:49AM -0700, Gregory Margo wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:39:23PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:31:13AM -0700, Gregory Margo wrote:
>> > When using a config from a different kernel, you should use
Sven Krahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/20/05, Andrei Mikhailovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any other way? Or waiting for debian developers to fix
> these
> issues is the only way?
>
>
>
>
> This is what in my opinion Goswin meant by 'Welcome to
Kirill Belokurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> By the way, can the same (or modified) approach be used for the installation
> of 32bit Flash Player Plugin?
>
> wbr, Kirill.
Possibly but more complicated.
You need a 32bit browser that is also available as 64bit and you have
to make sure
Gregory Margo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to compile the Sarge kernel for amd64.
> I have a dual Xeon system running Debian Stable for amd64, with the kernel
> kernel-image-2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp 2.6.8-14
>
> I have installed the source package
> kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6
Alexander Jede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a trick, that I can use apt-get as usual and not get this
> message:
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
> The following packages have unmet dependenc
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 18 July 2005 09:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Sunday 17 July 2005 13:28, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> Package fetching is do
jurriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody know how to get an unrar for x86_64? The internet seems to
> provide plenty of rpms, yet there's no .deb? Why?
>
> Thanks,
> Jurriaan
You can use the 32bit i386 rar package with ia32-libs or the upstream
linux tar.gz.
MfG
Goswin
--
T
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alan Ianson wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, about 97% of the 32bit debian packages are available for amd64 and
>> the
>> rest are being worked on. There are only two packages I have missed (lha and
>> cdrdao).
>
> BTW, cdrdao works fine on amd64, we're merely waiti
Nigel Ridley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just bought a new amd 64 based system and want to be able to check
> to see if my favorite apps are available prior to installing a 64 bit
> Debian system (Kanotix 64) -- if they are not then I will probably
> install a regular 32 bit system for
Patryk Cisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to install Sarge/AMD64 choot system inside my Sid/AMD64 system:
>
> # debootstrap sarge /var/chroot/sarge/ http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64
> I: Retrieving Release
> I: Retrieving Packages
> I: Validating Packages
> I: Checki
Soenke von Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks!
>
> I have found GDT8546RZ which would fit my needs, but when I "rgrep -i" for
> "icp" or "gdt" in /lib/modules/2.6.8-9-amd64-k8-smp/kernel/drivers/scsi , it
> only matches ips.ko which seems to be a SCSI, not SATA module. So I guess
> ther
v0n0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto:
>>- dpkg -i amd64-archive_0.2_amd64.deb
>>
>> This will download the i386 debs and convert them. Gives a lot of
>> output.
>>
>>
> ok, went well (when I installed dependanci
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 17 July 2005 13:28, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Package fetching is done by reprepro and turning it more verbose gives
>> some more messages but not a download progress for files.
>>
>> The package fetch
Attila Kocsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hy,
>
> I've tried to install sarge amd-64 on MSI K8N NEO
> PLATINUM, but it complains at first at the network
> card (I tried to use the nvidia 2 driver, though it is
> nvidia 3), then after rebooting it keeps on writing:
> nv_sata: Primary device added
Sylvain Archenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I can't install kdelibs4-dev, here the output i get :
>
> E: Impossible de corriger les problèmes, des paquets défecteux sont en
> mode « garder en l'état ».
> E: Impossible de corriger les dépendances, certains paquets ne peuvent
> pas ê
Kirill Belokurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>> As always, report success or failure please.
> Everything passed well - many thanks! I used sarge repository, because there
Good, thx.
> are some problems with libraries in etch/sid - they seem to be doing
> transition to the new version
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>
>>>But I can follow your argument. Dpkg should allow installing
>>>different C++ abis on the same machine. Only withi
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> I installed as suggested your new package amd64-archive_0.2_amd64.deb.
>
> Question:
>
> Are the packages debian-keyring and reprero needed ?
>
> I read somwhrere, debian-keyring should no be used.
I need the ftpmaster 2005 archive key from
/usr/
Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:59:43PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Check what apt-get wants to remove as it might remove the wrong
>> thing. It works for me but you might have something else installed.
>> Removi
Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got it to work, but not as you suggested.
>
>> Ah, I knew there was a reason why I used "Pre-Depends: lib32gcc1"
>> before. 'apt-get install --reinstall ia32-libc6' should restore the
>> link.
But this wasn't it. :) Pre-Depends changes nothing. :(
>> [EMAIL
mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quick question, one which may have been asked before.
>
> What is the difference between debian-amd64 and debian-pure64? Just
> that pure64 has absolutely no 32-bit compatibility?
>
> I replaced the "amd64" with "pure64" in my apt sources
>
> deb http://amd64.deb
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> A single C++-ABI package would just mean that all c++ packages are
>> kept back (or removed) from the very start of the c++ transition up to
>> the very end. There will be a
Forwarding for whom it may intrest:
--- Begin Message ---
Dear All,
I wrote a small page on running Linux on MSI S270 turion laoptop:
http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/msi_s270_linux.html
comments and feedback are welcome, especially on the double speed
clock and wifi issues (I found some hack
Volkher Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've just upgraded to X.org. After that, I tried to ugrade the package
> xbase-clients. But apt-get wants to remove all my gnome packages and the
> ones depending on gnome. Is that correct? Have I really to reinstall
> most of my desktop tool
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:33:12PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
>>
>>>Am Samstag, den 16.07.2005, 17:22 +1000 schrieb Hamish Moffatt:
>>>
I can't imagine how it's a good idea to upload a package which depends
on a ke
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> yes
>>
>> welcome to the c++ abi transition
>>
>>
> Maybe this has been suggested before, but...
>
> Probably more C++ abi changes will follow. To support a
> smoot
yes
welcome to the c++ abi transition
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 21:59 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I added OpenOffice.org to amd64-archive now and fixed the resulting
>> problems. I can now install and run OOo without any chroot with this.
>>
&g
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:13:36PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 07:02:01AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > You can't. The latest version checks the kernel version in preinst.
>>
Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't usually report these types of problems but this one was particularly
> nasty. I just had a major disaster by upgrading to udev 0.62. It requires a
> kernel 2.6.12.
> After a system reboot my system wouldn't function due to lacking /dev/sda2-5
> etc.
> I sor
Hi,
I added OpenOffice.org to amd64-archive now and fixed the resulting
problems. I can now install and run OOo without any chroot with this.
The package isn't perfect yet so there are some details you have to do
for now:
- wget http://amd64.debian.net/~goswin/amd64-archive/amd64-archive_0.2_amd
Dr Gavin Seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> When I run some software I get
> 'Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
> libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work'
> the only libgcc I see is
> 'libgcc1'
> and it says I have the latest version. How do I fi
Zaq Rizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't get X.org installed ... possibly someone has encountered this?
> dist-upgrade gives:
> libx11-6: Depends: x11-common (> 4.3.0) but it is not installed
> So I try apt-get install x11-common, which reports:
> Unpacking x11-common (from .../x11-common
Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0100, DR GAVIN SEDDON wrote:
>> I have realised the command on Linux is 'export'. I have installed the
>> nfs server software. I have sorted it.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -S `!!`
> dpkg -S `which exportfs`
> nf
Alexander Jede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
> I wanted to install sid and that for I searched in the amd64-How-To for
> a link to get a CD-image. Unfortunately the URL on the page don't exist
> any more. Perhaps any one can update the How-To.
> Alexander
cdimage.debian.org
MfG
Goswi
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm considering the purchase of a dual-opteron rig and have some
> questions. In general I don't care about anything being 64-bit, except
> my own applications. These are scientific applications developed using
> MPICH (g++-3.3 + MPICH MPI libraries).
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> El jue, 14-07-2005 a las 18:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've uploaded an update of amd64-archive to
>> http://amd64.debian.net/~goswin/amd64-archive/.
>>
>
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 18:22 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
> [snip]
>
> 37.5 cent packages? ;)
>
>
>
> (Or is that solely an Americanism?)
I don't get that. Must be an Americanism.
MfG
Gos
Hi,
I've uploaded an update of amd64-archive to
http://amd64.debian.net/~goswin/amd64-archive/.
Version 0.2 comes with support for rar and qemu and all their libs
preconfigured now. Next thing I will add is probably mplayer-686 and
w32codecs but you can test other packages yourself if you like. S
Andrei Mikhailovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:26 +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:20:44AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>> And btw, the latest udev will not even _install_ if you are not running
>> a 2.6.12 kernel. You upgraded too early...
>>
> W
v0n0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> v0n0 ha scritto:
>
>>No, it's just the right way it should be! But maybe someone'd want to
>>wait a few days to see if there are critical bugs.
>>However, I'm installing it now...
>>
>>
> The installation process ended without errors!!! And I didn't have to
> m
jefe boss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all
>
> Could u told me which repositories do u use to configure the source.list file?
>
> I've tried several and I get a lot of errors when I tried to apt-get
> update or install.
>
> For example, I can't find any security repository for amd64.
>
> Th
Jakub Nadolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW - if I would like to upgrade from i386 distro to amd64 - is it
> possible to do it with apt or I have to reinstall whole system?
Not before multiarch gets started and matures.
> I have tried to do it by changing APT::Architecture "i386"; to "amd64"
Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still stuck on/in woody on all my systems. Can't change just
> yet (I'm working on it), but in the meantime I'm trying to
> create packages that's true amd64.
>
> The kernel is from sarge (true amd64 kernel), but the rest
> of the system is pure
Jakub Nadolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have just upgraded my hardware to AMD64 and installed kernel-image
> 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8. So all packages remain in i386 version. Everything
> works fine, but iptables does not work:
>
> # iptables -L
> iptables v1.3.1: can't initialize iptables
gandrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello list.
>
> Yesterdey I spotted two problems with mkinitrd:
>
> $Id: mkinitrd,v 1.201 2004/05/16 22:00:48 herbert Exp $
>
>>from Sid with up to date updates.
>
>
> 1. In /usr/sbin/mkinitrd script is (or was) with "find" in line 601
>
> There is:
>
> find
Johan Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
> I've have a dual Opteron system (MB Tyan 2885) which has a Broadcom
> ethernet interface (the infamous tg3 driver). I've also installed a
> SATA raid card (a very nice LSI 300-8x, uses the megaraid_mbox driver).
>
> My problem is this: how on ear
Thomas Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/7/05, Zachary Rizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to run the FreeNX server, but it won't work
>> in amd64 "mode" because of a missing
>> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3, which is present in the
>> sid-ia32 chroot.
There is a libstdc++-libc6.2-2.
Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am using Galeon & Firefox in the 32bit chroot environment. I would like to
> be able to click on a mailto: link and bring up evolution which is in the
> standard 64 bit location. Is this easily possible?
> Regards
> Ed.
Sure, mount your 64bit system inside the c
Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Now that GCC 4.0 is the default compiler version in Sid, can we expect
> convergence between the unstable at amd64.debian.net and the gcc4
> archive at http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4/ ?
> Will the gcc4 archive become unnecessary i
kohzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's the motherboard for witch i was looking for information :)
>
> Your raid software is the motherboard one (from chipset, bios
> configuration ?) or you have create it during debian's installation ?
>
> And does anyone has try the promise chipset ?
It de
"Dr.techn. Alexander K. Seewald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Somebody should really go and compile Xvnc (vncserver) for the apt
> servers. Minimal patches are needed to make it work with XFree86
> 4.3.0 (i.e. you have to add -fPIC everywhere :->), but it took me
> almost a day to get it
"Matthew A. Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I see that gcc-4:4.0.0-1 became the default compiler on sid, do you
>>>think (o
Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dne st 6. Äervence 2005 22:16 Hugo Mills napsal(a):
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:20:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > It is impossible to install two packages that contain the same
>> > filename. Librar
David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> 3rd party software is nearly completly 32bit and our 32bit libs are
>> already in the wrong place for rpath then. We can move
>> /emul/ia32-libs/lib/* to /lib/i486-l
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> since there are sometimes bugs in AMD64 and NOT in Debian-32-Bit, I suggest,
> to create a special buglist, or a syntax to differ between the achitectures.
>
> As a friebd of the tool "reportbug" I suggest, that someone might create a
> special p
GOMBAS Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:20:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Also programs don't depend on something like galeon (i hope).
>
> $ apt-cache show liferea-mozilla
> [...]
> Depends: liferea (= 0.9.1-1), moz
GOMBAS Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:33:39AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Configure scripts have sometimes hardcoded paths to /usr/lib.
>
> And /usr/include. Don't forget that some packages install
> architecture-specific
Hugo Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:20:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 06:34:26PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> If we could ignore rpath problems, then moving everything to an arch dir
> under each lib dir would take care of the libs since the ld loader can
> handle the new locations. Building software may or may not work since
> configure scripts might get co
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I see that gcc-4:4.0.0-1 became the default compiler on sid, do you
> think (or better yet, know by experience) if's safe to switch to it
> already on AMD64, or should I put it on hold for now?
>
> Greetings,
As user of testing/unstable you are o
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Bob Proulx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Hugo Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > >How? You can't install your two multiarch versions of libvorbis
>> > &g
601 - 700 of 1213 matches
Mail list logo
