On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:50:10 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If it needs lib32nss-msdn then depend on it.
As I mentioned a few messages ago, that's a bug in googleearth-package
that has not been fixed yet.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:50:09 +0100, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> What the great god almighty Google hath created he now takes away from
> us
If you trust a guy from the internet, I uploaded a .deb of Googleearth
prepared with googleearth-package.
You can get it here:
http://malmostoso.altervista.o
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:10:09 +0100, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> Error code 29: Google Earth detected an error whilst trying to
> authenticate.
> Please check the following:
> - your network connection
> - your firewall settings.
And for that you have to install lib32nss-mdns.
#479319 has been fil
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:50:09 +0100, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> ./googleearth-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
> libQtWebKit.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
Well, it is probably not installed. Package is libqt4-webkit.
>> Btw, I suggest you also try out
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:30:11 +0100, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> debian:~# aptitude search ia32-libs
> i A ia32-libs- ia32 shared libraries for
> use on amd64 and ia64 sy
> p ia32-libs-gtk
But not ia32-libs-gtk.
Btw, I suggest you also try out googleearth-package.
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:10:10 +0100, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> How do I get this one to work?
$ apt-cache search ia32-libs
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:00:19 +0100, mtms wrote:
> any other ideas?
Try also getting rid of .gconf*
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:10:11 +0100, Maciek Kaliszewski wrote:
> so I think that ia32 version of Qt library will be necessary . I don't
> know if amd64 debian has prepackaged one.
One more reason to use the statically linked tar.gz instead of the 32-bit
deb.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #26
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:40:07 +0100, macdowell.smd wrote:
> can we run 32 bit pkg on amd64?
In principle, yes.
> specifically I would like to run
> skype-debian_2.0.0.72-1_i386.deb
I don't like forcing the installation of other arch packages.
If there is a tar.gz available, download that and put
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:00:09 +0200, Christopher Judd wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea as to what's going on here?
I'd suggest you move your profile away and start from scratch. I've been
using 9.5x on AMD64 from the first experimental builds and it works just
fine.
Alternatively, make sure it
On Thu, 22 May 2008 23:50:14 +0200, can comert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ compiz
> Fatal: Failed test: texture_from_pixmap support Checks indicate that it's
> impossible to start compiz on your system.
The error message is pretty explicit. You are using a video driver that
does not support the
On Sat, 17 May 2008 12:40:11 +0200, Alexandru Cabuz wrote:
> So is this related to a SCSI device naming bug or something? What's the
> fix?
If you provide:
# fdisk -l
$ cat /boot/grub/device.map
it will be much easier to help you.
Try reinstalling grub, also, with
# grub-install /dev/XXX
wher
On Wed, 14 May 2008 20:20:15 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> That patch does NOT compile for me with 2.6.25-2-amd64 which just
> entered Debian unstable. I made a patch based on 173.08's changes which
> does compile. It's a bit longer than the patch mentioned in that bug
> report but apparently
On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:50:15 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I am working on it. 173.08 builds fine with 2.6.25 so if nothing else I
> can compare 169.12 with 173.08 and see what nvidia changed to get around
> the change.
Lennart,
bug #476504, and in particular this comment:
http://bugs.debia
On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:40:19 +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> This one (ThinkPad R61) is currently a special offer at my usual IT
> shop:
> http://www5.pc.ibm.com/europe/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_NF0FDxx?
open&OpenDocument&epi=web_express
>
> It seems that it has all the recommended compon
On Sat, 10 May 2008 20:30:14 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Is there a debian way, to automatically build additional kernel-modules
> (i.e. madwifi, nvidia, virtualbox-ose etc.), when installing a newer
> kernelversion and headers ?
I wrote a (rather horrible) script once, that I invoke with cro
On Sat, 10 May 2008 15:30:10 +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> - Lightweight but usable (i.e. screen should be 14" or 15").
I'd stick with 13.3", since nowadays you seem to only be getting
widescreen laptops. And those are pretty big.
> - Wired network adapter
Can't think of a non supported o
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:30:21 +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> But
> anyway, is there any unknown trick in making a computer with two raid1
> SATA disks boot with Grub?
I have two SATA disks on a nForce4 motherboard in RAID1, and boot happily
with Grub. The RAID was set up during installation
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:30:19 +0100, Bonnel Christophe wrote:
> i wonder if
> it's possible to chroot the 64bit system into the 32bit chroot in order
> to use the 64bitOOO when i click on a .doc link
I don't really get what you want to do, but Openoffice is available for
AMD64 since ages, now.
An
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:20:15 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Why do I send this Mail to you ? I know, there is a lot of efforts, to
> get stable packets in Debian, but in this case you (the maintainers)
> will get no chance to get it stable, instead you work directly together
> with Nvidia itself
Dear list,
I am experiencing an annoying problem with the iwl4965 driver.
Currently, I am running two kernels on my Debian Sid laptop:
1) 2.6.22 with mac802.11 and iwlwifi patches from intellinuxwireless.org
2) 2.6.23 from the Debian kernel team, with iwlwifi merged directly by
them.I am not sur
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:30:11 +0200, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> my build environment is sid and I've installed these packages. gcc-4.2
> 4.2.2-3
> binutils 2.18-1
There it is, I was trying to compile with gcc-4.3.
Thank you so much for helping out, I overlooked that. Should probably
file a bug.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:10:07 +0200, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> I tried compiling 2.6.23.1 and faced no problems. It compiled fine.
>From kernel.org, I assume.
It must be a problem with Debian sources then.
Thanks for the feedback!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:40:08 +0200, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> it seems newer than what you downloaded. if so, let's try it
It sure is newer, but unfortunately the problem is not there... pristine
sources do not compile either :)
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Lin
Hello list,
I was trying to compile 2.6.23 starting from Debian sources, pulled from
the apt repositories published here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
The 2.6.23 in those repos works a charm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux vasquez 2.6.23-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 03:58:39 UTC 2007
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:10:04 +0200, scott wrote:
> I've never seen
> an error like this so I'm not sure how to proceed.
I'd start with a thorough memtest for several hours to see if there's any
faulty memory.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:10:09 +0200, Igor TAmara wrote:
> Have anyone succesfully used this hardware? Any hints on booting the
> installation or maybe testing the hardware to see if something is
> broken? Maybe software to test if everything is right?
You should probably go with one of the latest
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:20:07 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> (in my case it is a bug in kdelibs4c2a-*1-5.deb , which is fixed
> in kdelibs4c2a-**1-6.deb) But the latest version is not
> downloadable, although reportbug is seeing it.
It might be available for i386 but not for AMD64. In
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:30:13 +0200, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> I have tried with Iceweasel on Sid (2.0.6 or something). Started the
> browser, went to the page linked in the bug, started the game, played
> three stages (nice game ), opened a terminal from a button on my panel,
> pres
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:20:08 +0200, Rob Andrews wrote:
> What browser are you using?
I have tried with Iceweasel on Sid (2.0.6 or something). Started the
browser, went to the page linked in the bug, started the game, played
three stages (nice game :)), opened a terminal from a button on my pane
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:40:08 +0200, Max Alekseyev wrote:
> Could you please verify this bugreport?
I'm afraid I can't reproduce it. While the game is executing I opened a
terminal and could scroll my bash history without problems.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:50:05 +0200, Marcin wrote:
> Can anybody tell me what's wrong with the sun-java6-jre package. Some
> dependencies seem to be broken and i can't install it. I am running
> unstable.
As suggested, install "javapackage" and then from java.sun.com download
"jre-6u2-linux-amd64
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:20:08 +0200, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
> Well, it's a house and the walls are not concrete. So it seems like WLAN
> is easier. I use a laptop with wireless and it works pretty much fine.
I guess you know better :)
> So if I have only SATA harddrives and SATA DVD drive I w
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:30:08 +0200, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
> So, what is the recommended way to go: ASUS P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP or ASUS
> P5B Deluxe + WiFi card ?
I'd go for none, but use this instead:
http://www.devolo.com/co_EN/index.html
WLAN through walls is bad.
> One more question: I int
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:20:10 +0200, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> I need one more crash: what package gives one "dh_make"?
Behold: dh-make
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/dh-make
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:40:08 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> (1) Which the reason for removing "checkinstall" from "etch", in view of
> my reasons above?
I don't know, but I'd be more than sure that there are good reasons.
> (2) How to remedy?
Ditch checkinstall and learn the debian way. In pa
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:40:08 +0200, Brett Viren wrote:
> Both drivers failed to find the
> attached disks and so the md device could not be built.
The funny thing is that my /dev/md0 is actually built and from the
busybox shell I can actually build my other arrays. I can't seem to mount
them an
Hi all,
since yesterday I can't boot my AMD64 system with 2.6.21-1 (version
2.6.21-4) anymore.
My system is on an nforce4 board and uses mdadm do admin a three
partition RAID1 array:
/dev/md0 = /
/dev/md1 = swap
/dev/md2 = /home
The system starts, the initrd gets loaded, the array /dev/md0 sta
On Tue, 15 May 2007 14:40:12 +0200, Igor TAmara wrote:
> Is it possible to have a p2p private network to share those resources?
Bittorrent with a private tracker. Voila'.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 07 May 2007 22:40:10 +0200, Wayne Topa wrote:
> I 'thought' I read that the Athlon
> was a 64 bit processor. Am I wrong, again?
The Athlon64 is a 64bit processor. The original Athlon isn't :)
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSC
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:50:13 +0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> HARDWARE ERROR
> CPU 0: Machine Check Exception:4
> Bank 4: b2070f0f
> TSC a38a02f0b
> This is not a software problem!
Ah, been there done that.
As suggested, try updating your BIOS, bu
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:20:09 +0200, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> So far it has about five hours with no errors. I'm hoping there are
> other diagnostics I can use.
That's the most accurate I know about. As suggested by Lennart, check
that the timings in the BIOS are set to "auto".
> This see
On Mon, 07 May 2007 02:00:09 +0200, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I just got a new box (Athlon 54 X2 4200+ on a Gigabyte Technology NVIDIA
> GeForce 6100 Socket AM2 AMD ATX Motherboard).
They ripped you off man... they're called "64" ;)
> I'm getting miscellaneous
> crashes on Etch. They usua
Ciao Alex Samad, nel tuo messaggio dicevi:
> I have just tried installing xen amd64 on a dual core machine, and I get timer
> error's filling up my syslog, is this normal ?
Are you using a kernel < 2.6.16? It was the case a while ago, with newer
kernels it should be ok.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Li
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:00:19 +0200, Rob Andrews wrote:
> This is why the package is not built for amd64!
Definitely true. Let's give more general advice though: sometimes you
find i386 only packages, especially from 3rd parties.
If you have the source repository:
# apt-get build-dep package
#
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:40:30 +0100, Daniel Schröter wrote:
> is there someone using xserver-xorg 1:7.1.0-15 with the nvidia module
> under Debian/unstable with amd64?
I am actually using:
ii xserver-xorg 7.2-1 the X.Org X server
from experimental, and it works perfectly.
--
Best R
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:30:05 +0100, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> when AMD64 Java and flash will arrive?
AMD64 Java is already there (since ages, btw) and if you use Opera (and I
think Konqueror) you can use it in websites.
Firefox needs the .so plugin that I think does not ship with the 64bit
version,
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 04:30:13 +0100, C Wakefield wrote:
> I have never heard of such a source and what a treat for me.
Glad I helped. Just keep in mind that these are experimental kernels so
be always aware that problems might come up!
OTOH I am running a 2.6.20 for weeks now and I haven't had a
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:50:10 +0100, C Wakefield wrote:
> Since hwmon/k8temp support didn't appear until about 2.6.19-1 , and, I
> can't boot a kernel newer than 2.6.18
You might want to try a 2.6.20 from the Debian Kernel Team:
deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel trunk main
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:00:20 +0100, Jack Nespor wrote:
> Your CPU does not support long mode. Use a 32-bit
> distribution.
This error message is quite explicit. Use a 32-bit distribution.
> Has anyone successfully installed
> debian AMD64 on a Microsoft's Virtual PC 2007?
VPC is well known for
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:20:31 +0100, Zachary Rizer wrote:
> So, then, after a dist-upgrade, in which I have installed a new kernel,
> when the machine is rebooted into this new kernel, I must re-run m-a to
> install the modules for the new kernel?
Yes.
> Is there any way around this?
Well you co
Hi list,
I have finally decided to look into my little issue of no sound with
chroot applications. The AMD64 howto is down at the moment (or at least I
can't reach it) so I am not sure this is written there, anyway: all I had
to do was to bind mount my /dev directory.
My /etc/fstab looks like this
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:10:14 +0100, Sam Varghese wrote:
> And
> java-package looks pretty easy to use.
It is. And to add another bit of OT knowledge, it can package the IBM JVM
for the PPC architecture. Very useful.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:50:07 +0100, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> First on the list is the java browser pluging - the black down java
> sort-of-works(tm) (not a Debian package)
BS. The Sun JVM 1.5 exists in the AMD64 flavour. You just have to use
java-package to create a deb for your distro, if you need
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:20:11 +0100, leandro noferini wrote:
> What should I have to look for?
If you use firefox32 in a chroot, you should fill in /etc/resolv.conf in
the chroot too!
Otherwise, not sure about your problem. Can you access 216.239.37.104 from
firefox32?
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linu
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:20:07 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> since a while I try to launch compiz.
> It seems that there some conflict with sawfish:
> which WindowManager may be chosen to run with compiz ?
As it has already been pointed out, compiz is meant to replace your actual
WM. Please post yo
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:00:09 +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> But there is an old opteron 940 pin board that is going out of fashion
> and a new AM2 940 pin board coming in
>
> Can both of these let you add a wad of RAM to them?
Yes. I'd go for the AM2 though.
> How hard is it to instal
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:50:08 +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
>I need some Windows environment and wine does not help since it does not
> support USB as far as I know. Is there anyone using a virtual machine
> successfully on amd64. And if so, does it work properly?
Grab VMWare player, pr
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:00:14 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> And last but not least, another hint: The machines do freeze everytime,
> whenever no one worked on it, so, when there were no keyboard or other input.
Could you try opening your sshd server and try to connect to the frozen
machine whe
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:30:14 +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> How to check the filesystem (ext3) if it is not mounted?
umount /dev/whatever
e2fsck -options /dev/whatever
mount /dev/whatever
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:30:13 +0200, pietia .moo wrote:
> Few
> times every day my Debian freezes.
Try testing your RAM with memtest for a few hours and see if you find
errors there.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:50:10 +0200, Pascal Giard wrote:
> Simple question, why have you choosen to use indirect rendering as
> this is much slower than direct rendering?
I quote from $(man compiz.real):
--indirect-rendering
Force an indirect rendering context. Use this whe
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:10:07 +0200, garrone wrote:
> What happens when the kernel is upgraded? Does it break?
Well, yes, but it will be enough to go back to /usr/src and reissue
# m-a auto-install nvidia
# /etc/init.d/x|k|gdm restart
Done.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by D
Hi list,
I'm posting it here for future reference. Sorry if someone isn't
interested at all.
These steps work on my AMD64 X2 3800+ + Nvidia 6600GT + Asus A8N-E system.
All packages are taken from official Debian repositories, no need to
compile *anything*. Performance of 3D applications and video
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 01:20:07 +0200, chris wakefield wrote:
> I wonder if anyone can shed some light on my brain?
Is there any special reason why you are compiling your own kernel? Aren't
stock Debian kernels not good enough? I guess if you need some particular
options it's better to take Debian's
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:10:11 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Certianly nvidia made some fixes in their
> last release to support 7.1.
I upgraded today my box with Xorg 7.1 and the new nvidia-kernel-source and
everything went perfectly smooth.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:40:11 +0200, vitko wrote:
> You may want to ask in some Gnome forum or mailing list, or maybe file
> a bug against gnome-control-center(?).
I think I'll go through Bugzilla. I have posted in the Gnome forums and ML
but had no answers.
> Your first channel in mixer being "h
Hi there list,
I have installed a Creative Audigy LS 5.1 soundcard on my AMD64 system,
thus substituting the onboard audio of my ASUS A8N-E.
The card works perfectly and I have no particular problems with it.
The only thing I can't get to work right are the volume control keys on my
Logitech keyb
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:20:09 +0200, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> Just looking for some constructive feedback on other's opinions.
The answer is really easy: if you feel it's a pain then switch back to the
32bit.
I am perfectly happy with my 64bit setup, but the only thing I need 32bit
are OO.o and Op
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:40:04 +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Any pointers are most welcome!
The first question is: why do you compile your own kernel? Isn't the
Debian one enough? Does everything work OK with the Debian kernel?
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux o
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:40:07 +0200, Jo Shields wrote:
> Every single Free flash plugin sucks & is useless. That's about all
> there is to say on the matter right now
A bit brutal, but I'm afraid it is correct.
Another good example on why closed formats (and not closed source) are
bad. Adobe sai
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:20:03 +0200, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> Any hope of running flash on amd64 without chroot jailing firefox to
> 32bit mode?
If you talk about the macromedia plugin, you need the 32bit browser.
Otherwise, try gnash.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian G
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:50:08 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> It was formerly in Debian/unstable. Now it is gone, but I
> did not read anything, why it is gone.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=258057
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:50:12 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> But what the hell is this "/etc/rc.local" on Debian-systems ? I cannot
> find it anywhere, due to its different achitecture. Can some specialist
> help me ?
/etc/rc.local is simply the last init script run in redhat based distros.
It is
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:20:10 +0200, Alan Ianson wrote:
>> > Are all the needed packages in the regular debian archive, or do I
>> > need to add something to sources.list for the nvidia stuff?
>>
>> Which kernel are you running?
>
> 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8
You should probably enable the "contrib" and "
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:00:14 +0200, Alan Ianson wrote:
> 2. Should I install the drivers from the nvidia web site or is there a
> better debian way?
Of course the debian way:
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:40:07 +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
> But
> few minutes later I left dchroot for schroot, so the problem disappered
> completely ;-)
What are the advantages of schroot over dchroot? I never had problems with
it.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by D
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:10:08 +0200, Max A. wrote:
> Try
> exec dchroot -c ia32 -d -q "`basename $0` $ARGS"
That worked perfectly.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi list,
I have just upgraded dchroot and schroot to 0.99.2-2 and my dchroot_start
script does not work anymore.
If I start an application with it I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ opera
E: Only one command may be specified
I: Run "dchroot --help" to list usage example and all available options
If I s
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:20:05 +0200, m.v.wesstein wrote:
> Oh well, then I'll build a kernel from scratch myself (2.6.17,
> latest from kernel.org). No problem building the kernel and the modules,
> but after that I got stuck as I didn't have the initrd-tools to make an
> initrd image for that new
On Mon, 29 May 2006 00:50:08 +0200, valeanu.a wrote:
> as requested the howto:
> http://blue.dyn-o-saur.com/debianxgl/debianxglhowto.html
Hello there, and thanks for the advice, it seems like working.
I can start the Xgl server and compiz is running (according to ps), but
when I start gconf-editor
On Sat, 27 May 2006 19:00:08 +0200, valeanu.a wrote:
> ich have Xgl cvs running for at least 7 days uptime with no big problems
> at all.
Lucky you :D
I am trying to make the bloody thing work, and it dies complaining about
the FontPath. Needless to say, starting my normal X server works
beautif
On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:30:16 +0200, Jo Shields wrote:
> Anything
> different, especially containing "debian-amd64" is *NOT* Debian.
Not anymore, at least.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:30:17 +0200, Vadym Honcharuk wrote:
> which way is more properly: 1) use amd64
> base system (netinstall + X Window) with 32bit KDE and App, or 2) install
> i386 system, then install amd64-k8 kernel plus some 64bit's software like
> Nvidia driver, other porting soft...
None
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:40:16 +0200, Stefano Simonucci wrote:
> Then the compilation stops.
Sorry I should have told you in the Italian Mailing List :D
You need to patch the drivers, please see Bug #357992:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357992
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux Use
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:21 +0200, hendrik wrote:
> Is the restriction on kernels up to 2.6.11 serious?
At the time of the writing 2.6.11 was the newest kernel. I am running the
nvidia drivers with a 2.6.16 kernel.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:30:13 +0100, Bartek Boguszewski wrote:
> i just decided to install Debian into my laptop with AMD64 (AMD Turion/tm
> 64 Mobile) with NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 and I would like to ask which
> option is better:
Depends on how well Sarge supports your hardware and on how experien
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:20:21 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote:
> Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
> also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation. All
> other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can create
> .odt files.
>
>
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:10:17 +0100, hendrik wrote:
> couldn't open /etc/ld.so.conf: No such file or directory at
> /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps line 120.
Wow, this looks strange. AFAIK ld.so.conf is one of those files you really
need, as specifies the PATH for shared libraries.
Anyway, try using faker
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:00:15 +0100, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> So I was wondering if anybody here had a similar issue and/or knows about
> a python2.4 version (for AMD64) that is compiled as 32bit
Setup the chroot and work from there. Much much easier and cleaner.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux Use
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:30:19 +0100, sbrizio wrote:
> debootstrap --arch i386 sid /var/chroot/sid-ia32
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
>
> a message informs me that i can't download two files,precisely:
>
> libsig++-1.2-5c102 and slong1a-utf8
It is not a great solution, but I had a similar probl
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:00:14 +0100, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I believe it may be kernel version dependant. There has been work lately
> in 2.6 for supporting S.M.A.R.T. and other such things on SATA and 2.6.8
> certainly did not do it. This may be related.
It should work properly on kernels >=
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:30:18 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Can you please post full output (cut and pate from the prompt is best)?
I actually found that -I works:
nostromo:~# hdparm -i /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
nostromo:~# hdparm -I /dev/sda
Hello there list,
I have a quick question.
Looks like hdparm cannot set DMA on my SATA drives. Is this behavior
normal or is it just my drives?
I can't even get information about them with hdparm -i...
Thanks for helping!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on A
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:50:09 +0100, John Galatti wrote:
> My clock is running so fast it thinks the day is March 21
You may want to take a look to chrony:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show chrony
Package: chrony
Priority: extra
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 816
Maintainer: John Hasler <[EMAIL
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:50:17 +0100, Henrik Rasmussen wrote:
> I had also tried to download from http://ftp.debian.org/debian, with no
> success
> how do i come further?
I had a similar issue. I deleted everything and tried again, and it worked.
Hardly helpful, I know.
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linu
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:00:14 +0100, David Meggy wrote:
> Is this
> even the right place to look?
Yes, the mini.iso contains the very minimum. The rest of the installer is
then downloaded live.
Try with that!
--
Best Regards, Jack
Linux User #264449
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64
--
To
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:30:15 +0100, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Hint: swapoff, then read the mdadm docs on how to zero any superblocks
> that may remain on the underlying partitions, then re-create the raid
> array.
That's what I did:
# swapoff /dev/sda2
# swapoff /dev/sdb2
# mdadm --assemble /d
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:31:03 +0100, mtms wrote:
> Same here. Any hint anybody?
Add this to your /etc/firefox/firefoxrc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/firefox/firefoxrc
# which /dev/dsp wrapper to use
# FIREFOX_DSP="auto"
FIREFOX_DSP="/dev/null"
firefox will be mute though.
--
Best Regards, Jac
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:00:19 +0100, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Besides with the price of ram, a system shouldn't normally be swapping
> anyhow, so any minimal performance difference isn't worth considering.
> Neither is the cost of disk space for doing raid for swap.
I completely agree with you on
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo