Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-12 Thread Anders Helmersson
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 08:58:35 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:59:23AM +0200, Anders Helmersson wrote: > > I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester > > core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I > > suspect is

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:59:23AM +0200, Anders Helmersson wrote: > I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester > core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I > suspect is too low for running stably. Maybe the motherboard gives a > too low vo

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:06:39PM -0300, Peter Cordes wrote: > I'd been ignoring my Debian inbox for a long time until today... > > I have an Asus K8V (basic) with an Athlon64 3200+ (newcastle core) 1.5GB of > RAM, two IDE disks, two SATA disks, and an ATI AIW Radeon 7200 (but I don't > use the

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:06:43PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > What happens when you run with just the 512MB DIMM? The 1GB DIMM could > just be defective. > > [Also, if you want dual-channel, you have to two identical DIMMs] Socket 754 doesn't do dual channel so that should matter. Len So

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-07 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Anders Helmersson wrote: > I have tried powernowd on my A8V Deluxe with an AMD64 3200+ (Winchester > core). When it runs at 1000MHz the core voltage is set to 1.1V, which I > suspect is too low for running stably. Works fine here, with a 4400. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-06 Thread Anders Helmersson
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 18:06:39 -0300, Peter Cordes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:07:35AM -0500, David Wood wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? > > > > I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours > > or days of using cpufreq_ondema

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-06 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Peter Cordes wrote: > Even when running at 2.2GHz (full > speed) with only one stick of RAM (1024MB OCZ), it sometimes shows a cluster > of memory errors in memtest. It doesn't seem significantly different from > with both sticks of RAM, the other being a 512MB Infineon, IIRC. All DDR400. What h

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-10-06 Thread Peter Cordes
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:07:35AM -0500, David Wood wrote: > Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? > > I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours or days > of using cpufreq_ondemand, and I've had a few crashes I was pretty sure > were related to

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-27 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 27.01.2005 14:26:40, Stephan Seitz a écrit : On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:58:18PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq Hm, so I don't need the

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-27 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:58:18PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: When using cool and quiet, the CPU frequecy and the VCORE voltage are changed according to data you can find in: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq Hm, so I don't need the powernowd, because Cool'n'Quiet does the same job?

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-26 Thread Maurice
David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? My x-server crashed every now and then. Not reproducible but only with cpufreq ondemand enabled. I have these kernel-options enabled: CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFOR

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-26 Thread Stephen Hassard
I've noticed my AMD64 boxes be particularly sensitive to the ondemand cpufreq daemon, causing locks and other fun. As soon as I fell back to the good old userspace daemons, all my problems went away. I'm not sure if AMD64 likes the freq to be adjusted as fast as ondemand does. later, Steve Davi

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-26 Thread David Wood
Has anyone else noticed instability when using cpufreq modules? I have a pretty stable system, but I get OOPSes within a few hours or days of using cpufreq_ondemand, and I've had a few crashes I was pretty sure were related to cpufreq_userspace/powernowd. On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5

Re: Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-26 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 26.01.2005 14:33:03, Stephan Seitz a écrit : Hi! Does anybody has the Asus K8N mainboard? I like to configure my sensors.conf for this board. For now, the output is (default sensors.conf): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sensors it8712-isa-0d00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.50 V (min = +1.42 V, max

Asus K8N, Cool'n'Quiet, and sensors.conf

2005-01-26 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hi! Does anybody has the Asus K8N mainboard? I like to configure my sensors.conf for this board. For now, the output is (default sensors.conf): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sensors it8712-isa-0d00 Adapter: ISA adapter VCore 1: +1.50 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) ALARM VCore 2: +4.08 V (min =