On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:47 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Apologies for the late reply. I checked the system, and noticed I did
not have such a link. Just to be sure: The goal is to have the files
that are being written in /etc/lvm/{archive,backup} on a non-lvm
partition, right? So I
Koen Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:03 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sorry to jump into the thread like this, but: Why not put root on LVM as
well? I only put /boot in a separate partition, and use all remaining
space for LVM. But I'd rather know now that
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:03 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sorry to jump into the thread like this, but: Why not put root on LVM as
well? I only put /boot in a separate partition, and use all remaining
space for LVM. But I'd rather know now that my setup sucks (so I can do
something
Koen Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:12 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:23:50AM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
Just to add my mix to the mix
I usually set up like
500M /boot
10G /
2G ( or roughly mem size) to swap
the rest to LVM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:17:47AM +0100, Koen Vermeer wrote:
Sorry to jump into the thread like this, but: Why not put root on LVM as
well? I only put /boot in a separate partition, and use all remaining
space for LVM. But I'd rather know now that
I've found it useful to have *two* Linux systems on my machine -- one
stable, and one more cutting edge. If one dies, I can still use the
other for critical operations. Rhe machine I'm using currently has
three -- stable, testing, and gentoo. They all share /home. They all
share the swap
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 07:49:15AM -0400, Cavan Mejias wrote:
can a 64bit and a 32bit version of debian etch share the same /home
partition? Assuming you had the disk space to spare and each had its own / ?
Yes, that is what I have on my system. It is best if you have (more or less)
same
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:21:08PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
That's part of why I put swap in LVM. Why not put swap in LVM?
Well, basically 'cos the little i'vre read of LVM seemed to confuse
more that simplify and i don't wanna waste too much time setting this
up. It's just one disk,
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:12 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:23:50AM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
Just to add my mix to the mix
I usually set up like
500M /boot
10G /
2G ( or roughly mem size) to swap
the rest to LVM
with LVM I can expand/reduce and
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:21:08PM +, Nuno Magalh??es wrote:
That's part of why I put swap in LVM. Why not put swap in LVM?
Well, basically 'cos the little i'vre read of LVM seemed to confuse
more that simplify and i don't wanna waste too much time setting this
up. It's just one disk,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:21:08PM +, Nuno Magalh??es wrote:
That's part of why I put swap in LVM. Why not put swap in LVM?
Well, basically 'cos the little i'vre read of LVM seemed to confuse
more that simplify and i don't wanna waste too much time setting this
up. It's just one disk,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:38:24PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
I've found it useful to have *two* Linux systems on my machine
Interesting, especially since gentoo is a metadistribution. Anyway
i'll keep it simple with just one. I have two other machines laying
around, those can be my other
That's part of why I put swap in LVM. Why not put swap in LVM?
Well, basically 'cos the little i'vre read of LVM seemed to confuse
more that simplify and i don't wanna waste too much time setting this
up. It's just one disk, one home system, nothing mission critical. As
far as i now the
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:21:08PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
That's part of why I put swap in LVM. Why not put swap in LVM?
Well, basically 'cos the little i'vre read of LVM seemed to confuse
more that simplify and i don't wanna waste too much time setting this
up. It's just one disk,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:17:47AM +0100, Koen Vermeer wrote:
Sorry to jump into the thread like this, but: Why not put root on LVM as
well? I only put /boot in a separate partition, and use all remaining
space for LVM. But I'd rather know now that my setup sucks (so I can do
something about
I've found it useful to have *two* Linux systems on my machine -- one
stable, and one more cutting edge. If one dies, I can still use the
other for critical operations. Rhe machine I'm using currently has
three -- stable, testing, and gentoo. They all share /home. They all
share the swap
Nuno Magalhães [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings.
Yes, it's a religous question but i'll try to lmit it.
This is my df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 13G 8.6G 3.6G 71% /
tmpfs 991M 0 991M 0% /lib/init/rw
This
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
/usr can be read-only while /var must be read-write. Also /var might
cause fragmentation on the FS and then files in /usr will fragment
when you update the system.
Then you have to remount when you upgrade stuff, and that
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:23:50AM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
Just to add my mix to the mix
I usually set up like
500M /boot
10G /
2G ( or roughly mem size) to swap
the rest to LVM
with LVM I can expand/reduce and just about anything I want to do
That's part of why I put swap in LVM.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:15:11AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
/usr can be read-only while /var must be read-write. Also /var might
cause fragmentation on the FS and then files in /usr will fragment
when you update the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:12:08AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:23:50AM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
Just to add my mix to the mix
I usually set up like
500M /boot
10G /
2G ( or roughly mem size) to swap
the rest to LVM
with LVM I can expand/reduce
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:15:11AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
/usr can be read-only while /var must be read-write. Also /var might
cause fragmentation on the FS and then files in /usr will fragment
when you update the
Greetings.
Yes, it's a religous question but i'll try to lmit it.
This is my df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 13G 8.6G 3.6G 71% /
tmpfs 991M 0 991M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 10M 76K 10M 1% /dev
tmpfs
since drives now-a-days are so cheap.I don't have an answer to your other questions, but I think the two tmpfs is a symlink?-keith
Original Message
Subject: Partition suggestions.
From: "Nuno_Magalhes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, February 13, 2008 3:15 pm
To: de
On 2/13/08, Nuno Magalhães [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
Yes, it's a religous question but i'll try to lmit it.
This is my df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 13G 8.6G 3.6G 71% /
tmpfs 991M 0 991M 0%
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 20:15 + schrieb Nuno Magalhães:
Greetings.
Yes, it's a religous question but i'll try to lmit it.
[...]
1) What's with those two tmpfs? Are (both) really necessary? Isn't swap
enough?
/lib/init/rw is used by the initscripts, i guess it is necessary.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:13:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:15:35PM +, Nuno Magalh??es wrote:
Greetings.
Yes, it's a religous question but i'll try to lmit it.
This is my df -h
[snip]
Well one reason for seperate /var is that /var/log and /var/lib
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:15:35PM +, Nuno Magalh??es wrote:
Greetings.
Yes, it's a religous question but i'll try to lmit it.
This is my df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 13G 8.6G 3.6G 71% /
tmpfs 991M 0 991M
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:15:35PM +, Nuno Magalh??es wrote:
Usually i use / and /home only. This is a 160GB Maxtor drive.
2) How about 20GB for / and everything else for /home?
3) is it worth it to separate /var and /usr on a desktop system? Why?
Why not? What sizes?
4) What's standard
29 matches
Mail list logo
