Re: "Swap area shorter than signature indicates"

2007-05-07 Thread Matteo Vescovi
On 05/07/2007 10:24 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > That message is what to expect for a raid1 with both devices up and > running (U = Up) I kind of knew that, but needed some confirm ;-) >> Is the swap area working right despite the message above? >> If so, why do I get that strange message in the

Re: "Swap area shorter than signature indicates"

2007-05-07 Thread Cedar Cox
Everything seems setup correctly. What's in /proc/swaps? Probably you initialized the swap partitions before creating the raid array (on /dev/sda5 and/or /dev/sdb5). Software raid steals a bit of space from the device so your resulting mirror is smaller than each device. Make sure first that y

Re: "Swap area shorter than signature indicates"

2007-05-07 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 09:24:18PM +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote: > The subject of this mail is the message I can find for every boot in my > /var/log/messages file. > I've set up a RAID1 environment with etch amd64; it's composed of 2 > identical HDDs. The partitioning scheme is the same for both th

"Swap area shorter than signature indicates"

2007-05-07 Thread Matteo Vescovi
Hi all. The subject of this mail is the message I can find for every boot in my /var/log/messages file. I've set up a RAID1 environment with etch amd64; it's composed of 2 identical HDDs. The partitioning scheme is the same for both the devices. I've put the swap area (a /dev/md1 made by /dev/sda5