On 04/26/2010 02:22 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
[snip]
No, I just always use the upstream drivers. Can I partially install
the upstream 32-bit drivers?
Never used them directly.
I guess I'll have to bop on over to nvnews.net!
--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?
Ron Johnson writes:
> On 04/26/2010 03:31 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ron Johnson writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Why doesn't /usr/lib32/libGL.so* exist on my system?
>>>
>>> (This is a fresh Sid install.)
>>>
>&
On 04/26/2010 03:31 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
Hi,
Why doesn't /usr/lib32/libGL.so* exist on my system?
(This is a fresh Sid install.)
nvidia binary driver 195.36.15 installed from upstream.
$ apt-cache policy ia32-libs
ia32-libs:
Installed: 200
Ron Johnson writes:
> Hi,
>
> Why doesn't /usr/lib32/libGL.so* exist on my system?
>
> (This is a fresh Sid install.)
>
> nvidia binary driver 195.36.15 installed from upstream.
>
> $ apt-cache policy ia32-libs
> ia32-libs:
> Installed: 20090808
>
On 04/25/2010 12:12 PM, as wrote:
În data de Du, 25-04-2010 la 09:42 -0500, Ron Johnson a scris:
Hi,
Why doesn't /usr/lib32/libGL.so* exist on my system?
[snip]
$ dpkg -L ia32-libs | grep libGL.so.1
/usr/lib32/libGL.so.1.2
/usr/lib32/libGL.so.1
$ ls -aFl /usr/lib32/libGL.so*
ls: c
În data de Du, 25-04-2010 la 09:42 -0500, Ron Johnson a scris:
> Hi,
>
> Why doesn't /usr/lib32/libGL.so* exist on my system?
>
> (This is a fresh Sid install.)
>
> nvidia binary driver 195.36.15 installed from upstream.
>
> $ apt-cache policy ia32-libs
>
Hi,
Why doesn't /usr/lib32/libGL.so* exist on my system?
(This is a fresh Sid install.)
nvidia binary driver 195.36.15 installed from upstream.
$ apt-cache policy ia32-libs
ia32-libs:
Installed: 20090808
Candidate: 20090808
Version table:
*** 20090808 0
500
Hi
I use some application installed in chroot 32bit on my amd64.
I've installed ia32-libs-gtk and ia32-libs and put some lines
into /etc/fstab
When I run epiphany the follow error occurs:
(epiphany-browser:11459): Pango-WARNING
**: /usr/lib32/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: cannot
Hi
I use some application installed in chroot 32bit on my amd64.
I've installed ia32-libs-gtk and ia32-libs and put some lines
into /etc/fstab
When I run epiphany the follow error occurs:
(epiphany-browser:11459): Pango-WARNING
**: /usr/lib32/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: cannot
ge, so I'm trying to create one.
>
> You'd first need lib32-ized versions of all dependencies. I'd be
> tempted to "cheat" and just symlink the chroot's copy of
> libasound_module_pcm_pulse.so into /emul.
I actually tried that but with no luck. I even wen
Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 64-bit version of this is provided by libasound2-plugins.
> Unfortunately, while there is a lib32asound2 package, there is no
> lib32asound2-plugins package, so I'm trying to create one.
You'd first need lib32-ized ver
I've been looking around online and I've found a bunch of places that
offer hints for how to build i386 packages on and amd64 system, but
that's for "native" i386 packages. I'm wanting to create a local lib32
package (lib32asound2-plugins to be exact) and I can'
> x, gnome, kde, etc (Debian Sid).
> In both i use the amd64 net-inst etch cd, and then upgrade to Sid.
> Why in the p4d i have /emul /lib32 and /lib64?
> I think with the /emul and /lib32 i can run 32bits software, so i try this:
>
> #include
> using namespace std;
> in
etch cd, and then upgrade to Sid.
Why in the p4d i have /emul /lib32 and /lib64?
I think with the /emul and /lib32 i can run 32bits software, so i try this:
#include
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout << "32 bits cout test\n";
return 0;
}
But the binary creat
> that for openmotif and amd64.
>
> I posed this morning the question of OpenGL for 64bit to Gerd Knorr. However,
> may I ask about the strategy to follow for 32bit applications in debian amd64
> etch (installed on separate partitions /, /usr/. /var/ /tmp, and swap, ith
> RAID1) at
owever,
may I ask about the strategy to follow for 32bit applications in debian amd64
etch (installed on separate partitions /, /usr/. /var/ /tmp, and swap, ith
RAID1) at the current stage of development?
1) make use of /lib32 and /usr/lib32 as furnished on the installation.
performing an '
ask about the strategy to follow for 32bit applications in debian amd64
etch (installed on separate partitions /, /usr/. /var/ /tmp, and swap, ith
RAID1) at the current stage of development?
1) make use of /lib32 and /usr/lib32 as furnished on the installation.
performing an 'apt-get instal
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I must confess that I was not aware that amd64 etch provides /lib32
> and /usr/lib32. However, I did no link, no export. Should any exist in my
> installation (tell me what to search and how) it is [a bug of] the system. I
> have
I must confess that I was not aware that amd64 etch provides /lib32
and /usr/lib32. However, I did no IA installation, link, no export. Should any
exist in my installation (tell me what to search and how) it is [a bug of]
the system. I have reinstalled amd64 etch raid1 anyway to rule out any
I must confess that I was not aware that amd64 etch provides /lib32
and /usr/lib32. However, I did no link, no export. Should any exist in my
installation (tell me what to search and how) it is [a bug of] the system. I
have reinstalled amd64 etch raid1 anyway to rule out any mistake with the
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin:
> I did not install ia32. However, looking at the sources.list and commented
> lines, I fear I did a big mistake:
>
> I have a commeted line
>
> # deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
> and corresponding deb-src
>
expect to get the application running, I was just examining the
> > terminal info before engaging in a compilation at 64bit.
> >
> > To this regard, may I ask about the purpose of
> >
> > /lib32
> >
> > present in my root partition and containing a large number
ory
> has self contained libraries but asked at the launching command for a shared
> library (not found)
>
> libXm.so.3
>
> I did not expect to get the application running, I was just examining the
> terminal info before engaging in a compilation at 64bit.
>
> To this regard,
shared
library (not found)
libXm.so.3
I did not expect to get the application running, I was just examining the
terminal info before engaging in a compilation at 64bit.
To this regard, may I ask about the purpose of
/lib32
present in my root partition and containing a large number of
Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
> Now I tried to use a script in hugin to use the 32bit chroot for
> PTStitcher, but it doesn't works.
>
> ~/bin/PTStitcher
> #!/bin/bash
> dchroot -c i386_chroot -d PTStitcher $1 $2 $3 $4
> exit
>
> So, I'm not a good scripter and there might be a problem with $1 $2 $3
>
Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
> But I'm pretty sure you don't use PTOptimizer, because the source code was
||--^ I meant PTStitcher of course!
> never published and opened. There are only 32bit binarys on the net.
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.ptx/41
Lars Schimmer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gerhard Gaußling wrote:
>> Is there a way to have /usr/lib32/libpng.so.2 working without chroot?
>
> Why using 32bit versions?
> libpano12 - panorama tools
> libpano12-dev - panorama too
ow why it fails to link /usr/lib32/libpng.so.2, but
> linking /usr/lib32/libtiff.so.3 works, and also linking in chroot32 works.
>
> Is there a way to have /usr/lib32/libpng.so.2 working without chroot?
Why using 32bit versions?
libpano12 - panorama tools
libpano12-dev - panorama tools -
Hello,
I got a problem to run 32bit panotools on my amd64 breezy box.
I linked successfully 32bit libpano12 and libtiff.so.3, but I'm not able to
link libpng.so.2.
$ ldd PTStitcher linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libpano12.so => /lib32/libpano12.so (0x5558f000)
29 matches
Mail list logo
