On Friday 27 Nov 2009, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debian folks,
>
> I use Open Office. It works OK for me most of the time. It can save files
> as Microsoft Word documents. I work with people who use MSWindows software
> all the time such as MSWord etc. I want to send an encrypted or pass
gt; the document for you. Whether it attaches a password to it as well or
> > how the user at the other end decrypts it I don't know
> >
> > But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function
> > on it like there is in MSWord but there is a
ther end decrypts it I don't know
>
> But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like there is an encryption function
> on it like there is in MSWord but there is a password protection option
> when you save a file in it. If you look on google for Openoffice stuff
> on encryption on t
processor document in MSWord apparently according them
you just click on some menu item with encypt on it and it encrypts the
document for you. Whether it attaches a password to it as well or how the
user at the other end decrypts it I don't know
But with OpenOffice it doesn't look like t
Hello,
I have Lenny with the 2.6.23-8 kernel at home and have OpenOffice 2.2.1
installed on my system.
Today, I had to go home earlier than expected and so, I took some work
with me. I am working on a database under OObase at my work and I
thought I just have to send it to my home, open it and
On Mon, 2007-11-12 10:04:54 -0600, helices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :<
> However, it is intermittent.
>
> Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
> the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but,
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:20:23:52+0100]
scribed:
> > Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > > * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
> >
> > scribed:
> > > > Am Montag 12 November 2007 sch
* "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:20:23:52+0100] scribed:
> Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
> scribed:
> > > Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > > > * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100]
scribed:
> > Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > > * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
> >
> > scribed:
> > > > Am Montag 12 November 2007 sch
* "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:18:53:47+0100] scribed:
> Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
> scribed:
> > > Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > > > I have now experienced this three (3
helices:
> * Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:17:17:30+0100] scribed:
>> helices:
>>>
>>> Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
>>> the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
>>> menuse; no ctrl-f; nothing.
>>
>> Did you check
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> * "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100]
scribed:
> > Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > > I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :<
> > > However, it is intermittent.
> > >
> > > Sometimes
* "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:17:31:27+0100] scribed:
> Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> > I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :<
> > However, it is intermittent.
> >
> > Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on wind
* Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:11:12:17:17:30+0100] scribed:
> helices:
> >
> > Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
> > the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
> > menuse; no ctrl-f; nothing.
>
> Did you check /var/log/syslog
Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb helices:
> I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :<
> However, it is intermittent.
>
> Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
> the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
> menuse; no
helices:
>
> Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
> the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
> menuse; no ctrl-f; nothing.
Did you check /var/log/syslog and (IIRC) /var/log/xorg.0.log?
Another thing that comes to my mind: OOo has an opti
I have now experienced this three (3) times; so, it is chronic :<
However, it is intermittent.
Sometimes, when opening and/or manipulating an XLS created on winders;
the desktop freezes. The mouse pointer moves; but, no alt-tab; no
menuse; no ctrl-f; nothing.
When I ssh into this box, the CLI wo
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson píše v Čt 11. 01. 2007 v 19:14 +0100:
>Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It
> compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my
> server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hi
> Please try to do
>dpkg -i (both packages)
>That should fix it. I used dselect and I guess that saved me the problem. And
>please post it to the list if it works.
>
>/Gudjon
>
Running
dpkg -i (both packages)
installed the packag
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 01:02:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
> >Hi Tomek
> >> > packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
> >> > some unwanted stuff on my server.
> >> >deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalme
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hi Tomek
>> > packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
>> > some unwanted stuff on my server.
>> >deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
>> >
>> >/Gudjon
>>
>> Hi. I've just downloaded
Hi Tomek
> > packages on my server if you are interested. But as before, there may be
> > some unwanted stuff on my server.
> >deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/ amd64/
> >
> >/Gudjon
>
> Hi. I've just downloaded some ooo components from the link above and found
> out that there is
Użytkownik Gudjon I. Gudjonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hi
> Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It
>compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my
>server if you are interested. But as before, there ma
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> > > it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
> > > release etch as soon and not put more dif
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> > it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
> > release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
> > sid.
> Then I don't understan
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:52, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
> Hi
>Thanks for the answer.
>
> > >Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
> > > amd64?
> >
> > it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are wo
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:52, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
> Hi
>Thanks for the answer.
>
> > >Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
> > > amd64?
> >
> > it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are wo
Hi
Thanks for the answer.
> >Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for
> > amd64?
>
> it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
> release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
>
A Dijous 11 Gener 2007 19:14, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson va escriure:
> Hi
>Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64?
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openof
Hi
Can anyone explain to me why Openoffice 2.1 is not available for amd64? It
compiles perfectly and works nicely and you can get the debian packages on my
server if you are interested. But as before, there may be some unwanted stuff
on my server.
deb http://mc2-m038.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon
On Thursday 05 October 2006 5:29 pm, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
> I don't know about your hplj printer drivers, but I have a python-qt3 from
> testing here that seem be content with the current python 2.4.x.
> Depend says: <<2.5 and >= 2.3
>
Thanks - that got me thinking that perhaps just an upgra
On Thursday 05 October 2006 21:16, Scott Thomas wrote:
> I've tried installing via apt-get, but get a problem with required python
> version being higher than allowed by my hplj printer driver or by python-qt3
> (both require python <2.4 but openoffice.org causes installation of python
> 2.4.3-
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 6:00 pm, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi
>The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
> (unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and
> openoffice for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi
>The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
> (unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and openoffice
> for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two figure, a little
> bit of te
Hi
The newest version of openoffice more or less works. I have a doc file
(unfortunately confidential) that I have always tried to open and openoffice
for amd64 has always crashed on. Now I could open it. Two figure, a little
bit of text and an excel table is missing but the rest is there
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 21:56 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Your'e right. I meant if it is an official 64bit release from Sun
> Microsystems.
Is not. SUn apparently doesn't care.
> If not then what is the chance that the bugfixes that make this release usable
> on 64bit systems will be ad
--- Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto:
> P|pex wrote:
> > I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't
> run...
> > is't bug ?
>
> I guess more details would be welcome. :)
When I run oowriter the first time the following error
occurs
"/home/gianluca/-writer doesn't exist"
I
Użytkownik Giacomo Mulas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
>
>> It's an official one.
>>
>> Look there:
>> http://packages.debian.org/...
>
>I don't think the question was "is it an official debian port", which it
>clearly is. I suppose he meant "is it an off
wer to this latter one...
>
> Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
> Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
>
> You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
> or natively 64bits. :)
Definite
latter one...
Hum I can't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)
Regards
Last week, I installed openoffice wit
an't reach my own amd64 now but I can tell you how to check this.
Just do: file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
You will be told if your OpenOffice is chrooted in 32bits environement
or natively 64bits. :)
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury | Office: 211
Associate Profess
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.org&searchon=names&subword=1&version=unstable&release=all
I don't think the question was "is it an official debian port", which it
clearly is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the
> community?
It's an official one.
Look there:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=openoffice.org&searchon=names&subword=1&version=unstable&release=all
Regards
--
Emmanue
Is this AMD64 port of OOO in Sid an official one or is it made by the community?
Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 10:27, P|pex wrote:
> I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
> is't bug ?
What do you get if you run it from an xterm or so?
It works fine on my box...
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
P|pex wrote:
> I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
> is't bug ?
I guess more details would be welcome. :)
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury | Office: 211
Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 35 24
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax: +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69
I installed the 2.04 from sid, but OO.org don't run...
is't bug ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto
spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
http://mail.yahoo.it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi again
>An hour after my emailing I found out that openoffice for amd64 had been
> accepted into the unstable repository. You can read about it on
> http://openoffice.debian.net/
> so I removed my packages immediately.
This is really a great new
Hi again
An hour after my emailing I found out that openoffice for amd64 had been
accepted into the unstable repository. You can read about it on
http://openoffice.debian.net/
so I removed my packages immediately.
Regards
Gudjon
Þann Mánudagur 25. september 2006 02:29 skrifaðir þú:
> Gud
Hi
I have compiled openoffice 2.0.4 rc2 and it can be found on my server
deb http://mve035.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/amd64/ ./
Has anyone tried kdenlive on amd64. Shall I ask Marillat to add amd64 to the
list of supported distributions? (don't know if he will) The
option "
On Thursday 21 September 2006 17:41, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice
> > according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official
> > packages (re-built
Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice
> according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official
> packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this
> list, but I haven't ha
to the build directory: cd openoffice-*
3) Build the package (this might take quite a while):
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
Just a note to say that I think it's the same 'apt-get -b source -t
experimental openoffice.org' and it makes it easier (1 step instead of
those 3) ;)
Rafael Rodríguez
Hi,there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite a lot. In fact, I have a bug
Andrew Robinson wrote:
Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the "Andale
Mono" is now available, but that didn't help
What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
contant (in oocalc, the fonts in the cells are fine). It is only the
windowing fonts (menu b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 08/24/2006 09:20 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the "Andale
> Mono" is now available, but that didn't help
>
> What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
> c
TECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Robinson wrote:
> I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
> environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
> extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
> font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).
&
Andrew Robinson wrote:
I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).
I'm not sure if this is
I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot
environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is
extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt
font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge).
I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font or resol
Hi all,
OpenOffice is still quite far from being usable for amd64 architecture.
I would like to share what I know about this package and try to make it
easier for people to contribute to the amd64 port (bug reports, patches,
and so on).
First of all, few links about OpenOffice:
http
s the way to make it works:
1) Get the source from the Debian repository
apt-get source openoffice.org
2) Get the package needed to compile this (as root)
su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org'
3) Move to the build directory
cd openoffice-*
4) Ask to build the amd64 arch packages
iter - and that package seems to work very well.
Well, I did experience problems on a sarge box, related to java (on which
openoffice heavily relies). The problem persisted with the java runtime
environments from sun, ibm, blackdown, and apparently was simply due to java
triggering a bug in the l
Hi
Edit openoffice.org-2.0.3/debian/rules and there is some variable
build_amd64???=n that should be y
I only started building it seemed to work properly after that change.
Hope it helps
Gudjon
Þann Mánudagur 24. júlí 2006 23:13 skrifaði Emmanuel Fleury:
> Hi,
>
> A J Stiles wrote:
> > I do n
Hi,
A J Stiles wrote:
>
> I do not *want* pre-built .debs. What I specifically want is to compile the
> whole thing from source on my own machine.
Do the following:
1) Get the sources:
apt-get source openoffice.org
2) Get the packages needed to compile it:
su -c 'apt-get buil
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:57:07PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
> On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
> > I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
> > only very few
> > crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
> > others it has
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:40:56AM +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
> On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:39, sigi wrote:
> > > Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?
> > > I'm running 64-bit Sid.
> >
> > Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to
> > the b
On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:39, sigi wrote:
> > Where can I get the .dsc, .diff and .tar.gz files to build this?
> > I'm running 64-bit Sid.
>
> Read the above mails again, and you will find a working link directly to
> the built debs... ;)
>
> Download them, install them, and enjoy.
I do not *w
Þann Fimmtudagur 20. júlí 2006 23:15 skrifaði sigi:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > Adam Stiles wrote:
> > >On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
> > >>I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and
> > >>had
> > >>only very few
yCode, that you want.
OpenOffice.org is now already installed in the debian-package, so, the
only
thing you need to do is just type openoffice into a shell
or
click on the icons at your WindowManager.
Thierry
Hi
Go to http://openoffice.debian.net/ and there you will find all
information but I recommend setting up a chroot for openoffice. I have both
chroot and amd64 version of openoffice and the 64 bit crashes sometimes when
opening doc files. But version 2.0.3 is better than 2.0.2.
/Gudjon
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:50:13PM +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> Adam Stiles wrote:
> >On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
> >
> >>I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and
> >>had
> >>only very few
> >>crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-wor
Adam Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no problem.
Saving documents failed never here - nei
Hi,
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> > > Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
> > > > I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been
> > > > quite
> > > > pleased with it. There's a working AMD64 port here:
> > > >
> > > > htt
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
> I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
> only very few
> crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
> others it has no problem.
>
> Saving documents failed never here - neither on .odt no
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
> > I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been quite
> > pleased with it. There's a working AMD64 port here:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~rene/ope
Je 2006/07/20(4)/14:07, Joost Witteveen skribis:
> I've been using a 64 bit OOo for a couple weeks now, and have been quite
> pleased with it. There's a working AMD64 port here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.3/amd64/
That's the 2.0.3-1 version, released 2006-07-01, right?
2006/6/20, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
thomas parquier wrote:
> I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted
> files.
> I get this message :
> input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
> (translated from french :)
Which versi
Hi,
thomas parquier wrote:
> I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted
> files.
> I get this message :
> input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
> (translated from french :)
Which version exactly?
Regards,
Rene
signature.asc
Desc
Hi,
I'm using openoffice.org 2.0 in a chroot, and I can't open nfs mounted files.
I get this message :
input/output general error while accessing to /mnt/server/path/file.odt..
(translated from french :)
Server is actualy mounted in /chroot/mnt (automounted), I put a symlink in /.
BTW, I mounted
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:08:24PM +0200, thomas parquier wrote:
> Ok, I've just changed the classic mount to a bind-mount, for the home
> partition.
> But there's still the error a mentioned. Regarding the twice
> auto-mounted remote shares, I believe that if you're right about twice
> mounted fi
thomas parquier wrote:
>Hello everybody,
>
>I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
>environment.
>I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
>twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
>fstab :
thomas parquier wrote:
>Hello everybody,
>
>I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
>environment.
>I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
>twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
>fsta
Hello everybody,
I'm having problem with openoffice, which is launched in a chroot'ed
environment.
I automount a remote directory in my home partition which is mounted
twice, once in the host environment and once in the chroot :
fstab :
/dev/sda10 /home ...
/dev/sda10 /var/chroot/sarge
Hi,
Rafael Rodr?guez wrote:
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm
"This does not mean that porting OpenOffice.org to x86-64 is over[...]
[...] Of course, no-one says how much it will work for you ;-)"
Still looks as a working OOo is
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (03/04/06 16:50), Sylvain Archenault wrote:
> Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade
> to login_4.0.15-1
> (http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
>
> Have a nice day :)
Thanks Sylvain
I was bitten
Thanks to a private message, I found the solution, I needed to downgrade
to login_4.0.15-1
(http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/03/23/debian/pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.15-1_i386.deb).
Have a nice day :)
Sylvain Archenault wrote:
Hello,
Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice
Hello,
Since this morning, I can't run OpenOffice in my chroot. Here is the
output :
dchroot -c ia32 -d -q oowriter
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 7: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 9: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: line 11: my: command not found
/usr/bin/oowriter: oow
ges.
Wrong. (although it has the same effect, but...)
> < find $(PKGDIR)-$$i -type f -name "*.1" | xargs gzip -9; \
> ---
> > find $(PKGDIR)-$$i -type f -name "*.1" | xargs gzip -9 -f; \
What for?
> copy some file
> cp debia
Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> FWIW, I did build 2.0.2-1 for amd64 with gcj 4.0. It still is broken as
> known and this will not change as fast as many people assume. The stuff
> get SLOWLY forward, though.
>
> (http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/2.0.2/experimental, _all
> ones in ..)
>
>
Hi,
Mickael Marchand wrote:
> Emmanuel Fleury a ?crit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
> > out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
> >
> > http://wiki.services
Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
> out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
>
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wi
Hi all,
I just want to advertise the new Wiki system of OpenOffice and to pint
out a page specifically dedicated to the OpenOffice port to AMD64.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Porting_to_x86-64_%28AMD64%2C_EM64T%29
Regards
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:20:21 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote:
> Everything work great, but: I can't open .odt (well all .od*) files and
> also the .sxw (all .sx*) files. Is it the same with your Installation. All
> other files (e.g. .doc files) open without problems. I even can create
> .odt files.
>
>
Hi Klaus,
> Is this possible for Sarge or only for Sid? I suppose only for Sid because:
I had to use experimental some days ago.
Greetings, Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Montag 6 März 2006 15:58, Emmanuel Fleury a écrit :
> Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> > But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) -->
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
> >
> > 1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
>
> Ooops. Old version, sorry -
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
>
> But, why don't you try on the 2.0.2 version (I should try as well) -->
> http://lwn.net/Articles/172474/
>
> 1) wget http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.1.0.tar.gz
Ooops. Old version, sorry -->
http://go-oo.org/packages/OOB680/ooo-build-oob680.5.0.tar.gz
t;>> Is there w workaround for this?
>>>
>>> Greetings, Tobias
>>>
>>>
>>
>> this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
>> nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.
>>
>>
Adam Stiles a écrit :
> On Monday 06 Mar 2006 09:18, Tobias Krais wrote:
>> Hi together,
>>
>> I recently installed Debian OpenOffice.org packages from
>> deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./
>
> Do you have a link to a corresponding deb-src line, or at least the .diff
> file?
>
gt;
>
> this OOo build is known to be highly experimental, for now, there is
> nothing much you can do except reporting bugs to the OpenOffice bugtracker.
>
> I will try to build new packages soon based on the recent new upload.
There are some problems due to the gcj compiler (better
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
