Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
Aren't you one of the maintainers?
I've been waiting for 1 year and
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
As Adam already said it is in his tree/queue for the next upload.
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
Aren't you one of the maintainers?
Yes.
David N. Welton wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
As Adam already said it is in his tree/queue
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you
saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them have
time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year?
Since i don't dig into the other 4 maintainer private lifes and I can
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you
saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them
have time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year?
Since i don't dig into the other 4
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
Aren't you
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you
saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them
have time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year?
Since i
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you
saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them
have time to work on most of the bugs for the
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
Isn't it traditional to submit patches before an NMU? How do you propose
to fix it? The only real way to fix it is to move the config out of
mod_ssl's config and into the default ssl vhost. Which is a bit of a
catch 22,
Adam Conrad wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
Isn't it traditional to submit patches before an NMU? How do you propose
Yes, it is. I was only asking if you'd mind. :)
to fix it? The only real way to fix it is to move the config out of
On
apr_1.2.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apr_1.2.2-3.dsc
apr_1.2.2-3.diff.gz
libapr1_1.2.2-3_i386.deb
libapr1-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb
libapr1-dbg_1.2.2-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Rejected: apr_1.2.2-3.dsc refers to apr_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it
in the queue or in the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
1 Million neue Baeume fuer die Welt -
jetzt dabeisein und sogar mitverdienen!
http://email-partner.com/nlforestation.asp
tags #349709 patch
thanks
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
I would like to submit a patch
Attached.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #349709 patch
Bug#349709: apache2-common: please add more flexibility to apache2ctl
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
apr_1.2.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apr_1.2.2-3.dsc
apr_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
apr_1.2.2-3.diff.gz
libapr1_1.2.2-3_i386.deb
libapr1-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb
libapr1-dbg_1.2.2-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
(new) apr_1.2.2-3.diff.gz optional libs
(new) apr_1.2.2-3.dsc optional libs
(new) apr_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz optional libs
(new) libapr1-dbg_1.2.2-3_i386.deb optional libs
The Apache Portable Runtime Library - Development Headers
APR is Apache's Portable Runtime Library, designed to be a support
tags #349716 patch
thanks
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 09:38:04PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
I would like to submit a complete rewrite for a2[en|dis][mod|site].
Attached.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | I don't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #349716 patch
Bug#349716: apache2-common: please consider giving a2[en|dis][mod|site] more
flexibility
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Package: apache2-common
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hi,
the init script goes to some lengths to find out about the contents
of the PidFile directive. It currently supports one-level includes,
but no deeper include recursion and no conditionals. Implementing this
outside apache is tedious,
Package: apache2-common
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
why is apache2 configured to write its pid to /var/run/apache2.pid
instead of /var/run/apache2/apache2.pid? Is that an oversight in
packaging or am I missing something?
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
Marc Haber wrote:
why is apache2 configured to write its pid to /var/run/apache2.pid
instead of /var/run/apache2/apache2.pid? Is that an oversight in
packaging or am I missing something?
You're missing the fact that, while the current location isn't ideal,
it's a serious pain in the ass to
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:15:52PM +, Adam Conrad wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
why is apache2 configured to write its pid to /var/run/apache2.pid
instead of /var/run/apache2/apache2.pid? Is that an oversight in
packaging or am I missing something?
You're missing the fact that, while the
24 matches
Mail list logo
