Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Christof Warlich wrote:
> > If this assumption is true, then why is the Debian build system (i.e.
> > dpkg-buildpackage) not smart enough to simply ignore an existing +bX
> > extension for Architecture: all binary packages? IMHO, this would simplify
> > matters, as
On 2024-03-04 06:19:58 +, Warlich, Christof wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > This is wrong. apache2-data is an Architecture: all package,
> > but apache2 is Architecture: any. So using ${source:Version}
> > here is correct. Note that Debian does not currently support
> > binNMUs for
Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> This is wrong. apache2-data is an Architecture: all package,
> but apache2 is Architecture: any. So using ${source:Version}
> here is correct. Note that Debian does not currently support
> binNMUs for Architecture: all packages, so apache2-data will
> never have a +bX
On 2024-02-28 07:16:07 +, Warlich, Christof wrote:
> Subject: apache2: (Legacy?) "Depends: apache2-data (= ${source:Version})," in
> debian/control breaks binNMU builds.
> Source: apache2
> X-Debbugs-Cc: christof.warl...@siemens.com
> Version: 2.4.57-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification:
Subject: apache2: (Legacy?) "Depends: apache2-data (= ${source:Version})," in
debian/control breaks binNMU builds.
Source: apache2
X-Debbugs-Cc: christof.warl...@siemens.com
Version: 2.4.57-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags:
5 matches
Mail list logo
