Hi,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:06:03AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Verified to build with gcc 4.8 and workarounds for the above on changsha.
Ignore the gcc 4.8 bit, was needed until it got properly fixed and I forgot
to edit it out when sending. Works also with gcc 4.9 now.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 02:22:29AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Libreoffice needs major porting work (in their equivalent of
> libffi). That will get done, but is not a priority for anyone yet. (It
So, during DebConf RH finished their port and I've been able to backport
it[1]
The archive misses so
Hi Vagrant,
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 12:55:41 Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
[...]
> I can handle the rpi_b, Cubieboard, am335x_boneblack, Bananapi,
> wandboard_quad, and maybe the nokia_rx51. If we ever get support
> upstreamed, maybe the cubox-i target as well...
>
I can help with the Cubox-i2
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:52:52PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>Hi,
>
>If I set up a Debian Wheezy armhf environment, and build packages,
>why do those packages not work on Raspberry Pi ? The built package
>when run on the RPi errors out with "Illegal Instruction".
Simple: armhf is targeted at
Hi,
If I set up a Debian Wheezy armhf environment, and build packages, why
do those packages not work on Raspberry Pi ? The built package when run
on the RPi errors out with "Illegal Instruction".
I read about using the armel port, but given that RPi itself is such a
low capable hardware, an
On 2014-09-04 04:32, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 11:46 -0400, Li, Peng wrote:
HI Tim,
I am glad to report that, it's now working. Many thanks to Tim
and Ian as well.Peng
>> 2. The setting was not stayed and we ended up on /dev/ram situation
>> again.
>
> To make the change
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 11:46 -0400, Li, Peng wrote:
> HI Tim,
> I am glad to report that, it's now working. Many thanks to Tim
> and Ian as well.Peng
>
> >> 2. The setting was not stayed and we ended up on /dev/ram situation
> >> again.
> >
> > To make the change in u-boot stay before yo
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 12:55 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I'm looking for people willing to test u-boot targets on an ongoing
> basis for various platforms. While I have a handful of boards I can test
> on, I don't have the hardware or perhaps more importantly, the time to
> always test on all
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 07:15 +0200, drEagle wrote:
> > armhf: mx51_efikamx, mx51_efikasb
>
> efika are no more supported by kernel and d-i, so useless.
As the person who removed the d-i support:
Yes, we should probably drop these from the u-boot package too.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
9 matches
Mail list logo
