Re: orion5x housekeeping

2016-01-02 Thread Chris Moore
Hi Martin, Le 02/01/2016 20:36, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : By the way, I'm still getting emails from NSLU2 users from time to time and there's nobody in Debian left who cares about this device. I think we also need a hardware deprecation mechanism, so we tell users in advance that support is g

Re: security labeling handle: No such file or directory (what file?)

2016-01-02 Thread Alan Corey
I basically stumbled across this. I just did apt-get update and I'm running dpkg 1.17.25. There's a page at https://fossies.org/diffs/dpkg/1.18.0_vs_1.18.1/src/selinux.c-diff.html talking about an selinux change in dpkg 1.18.1. I should do an apt-get upgrade if my current apt-get -f install fini

Re: orion5x housekeeping

2016-01-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Karsten Merker [2016-01-02 13:23]: > As a personal note: I am happy for everybody who uses d-i to install > a proper Debian instead of using a pre-made installation in the form > of an SD-card image that some unknown entitiy on the internet has > uploaded to some share-hoster, which is unfortuna

Re: orion5x housekeeping

2016-01-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Campbell [2016-01-02 10:26]: > I wonder if, for armel generally (or even arm* generally), we should > take a leaf out of the u-boot package's book[0] and require a specific > person from the community to agree to be listed as a tester for any > platform we intend to Support, meaning that the

Re: orion5x housekeeping

2016-01-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 18:51 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I was looking at debian-installer and thought it would be good to see > if there are maintainers (and if not, at least users) for the orion5x > devices we supposedly support. I wonder if, for armel generally (or even arm* generally), we