On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 11:19 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> ...
> > OK, but nslookup raspi.debian.net and whois 208.97.148.173 shows
> > raspi.debian.net is hosted at NightmareHost, which probably explains
> > the very long delays in seeing the site sometimes. I respect
> > Gunnar's support for raspi's,
Oregano dijo [Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 11:26:37PM +]:
> >> I have some doubts that debian.net has the same ownership
> >> than official debian.org?
> >
> > debian.net and debian.org have the same ownership (Debian, via our
> > fiscal sponsor SPI). debian.org subdomains are setup by the Debian
> >
Gene Heskett wrote:
> It night "sound interesting" if it had sound, but thats the quietest
> movie I've watched in months. No audio buttons to be found.
sound appears to be muted. In the latest and greatest firefox it worked
after unmuting
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
On zondag 12 september 2021 01:26:37 CEST Oregano wrote:
> OK, but nslookup raspi.debian.net and whois 208.97.148.173 shows
> raspi.debian.net is hosted at NightmareHost, which probably explains the
> very long delays in seeing the site sometimes. I respect Gunnar's support
> for raspi's, but the c
September 11, 2021 11:16 PM, "Paul Wise" wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 7:50 AM LinAdmin wrote:
>
>> I have some doubts that debian.net has the same ownership
>> than official debian.org?
>
> debian.net and debian.org have the same ownership (Debian, via our
> fiscal sponsor SPI). debian.org
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> ... 100 microseconds as the output of the linux-rt list get adopted into
> shipping kernels. That is its target, to become the default kernel.
I believe the intent of the Linux RT developers is to keep it as a
build-time config option, so it w
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:13 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I am one of them. I am willing (and have done so extensively) to put
> time into making Debian easy to use in the Raspberry family, but I am
> convinced raspi-firmware cannot be part of Debian itself.
While raspi-firmware can't be in Debian mai
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 7:50 AM LinAdmin wrote:
> I have some doubts that debian.net has the same ownership
> than official debian.org?
debian.net and debian.org have the same ownership (Debian, via our
fiscal sponsor SPI). debian.org subdomains are setup by the Debian
sysadmins and mostly run on
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:05 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> So why do we not have a .deb builder for kernels.?
The upstream Linux kernel build system can build .deb files using the
`make deb-pkg` (build .dsc+.deb files) or the `make bindeb-pkg` (build
.deb files).
https://www.kernel.org/doc/makehelp.t
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:35 PM Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> They are not designed to suit you. I guess you want to build your own
> kernels with the RT_PREEMPT enabled, and that's not something you will
> get with any of the mainstream Linux distributions.
This is incorrect, Debian has had RT kernels bu
On 2021-09-11, Oregano wrote:
> September 11, 2021 11:30 AM, "Peter Ehlert" wrote:
>> On 9/11/21 1:11 AM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>>> Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
>>> the Pinebook Pro for my next laptop
...
> Debian installer on an SD card ran OK, but wasn't a
September 11, 2021 11:30 AM, "Peter Ehlert" wrote:
> On 9/11/21 1:11 AM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
>> the Pinebook Pro for my next laptop
>> T
On 2021-09-11, Peter Ehlert wrote:
> On 9/11/21 1:11 AM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
the Pinebook Pro for my next laptop
...
> superior build quality, I really lik
On 9/11/21 7:24 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 11 sep 21, 04:30:21, Peter Ehlert wrote:
On 9/11/21 1:11 AM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Kind regards,
Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
the Pinebook Pro fo
On Sb, 11 sep 21, 04:30:21, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
> On 9/11/21 1:11 AM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
> > > > the Pinebook Pro for my nex
On Saturday 11 September 2021 04:11:26 Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
>
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >>Kind regards,
> >>Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
> >>the Pinebook Pro for my next laptop
>
> There's an interesting review of the Pr
On 9/11/21 1:11 AM, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Kind regards,
Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
the Pinebook Pro for my next laptop
There's an interesting review of the Pro here:
https://www.jeremymorgan.c
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 4:27 AM Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> ...
> There's an interesting review of the Pro here:
> https://www.jeremymorgan.com/blog/linux/90-days-with-pinebook-pro/
>
> Sounds interesting. Pity they are out of stock
They seem to be always out of stock. I've been trying to buy a
pin
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:01:49 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>Kind regards,
>>Andrei -- happy Debian user of a PINE A64+ and (still) considering
>>the Pinebook Pro for my next laptop
There's an interesting review of the Pro here:
https://www.jeremymorgan.com/blog/linux/90-days-with-pinebook-pro/
S
19 matches
Mail list logo
