On 2021-09-23, LinAdmin wrote:
> On 10.09.21 21:40, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2021-09-10, LinAdmin wrote:
>>> The unnamed decision makers of Debian some unknown time ago
>>> decided that Pi and *Pine* stuff won't be supported by Debian.
>> This is the second time you've stated this, without r
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 06:24:22PM +0200, LinAdmin wrote:
> On 10.09.21 21:40, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2021-09-10, LinAdmin wrote:
> >> The unnamed decision makers of Debian some unknown time ago
> >> decided that Pi and *Pine* stuff won't be supported by Debian.
> > This is the second time
On 10.09.21 21:40, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-09-10, LinAdmin wrote:
>> The unnamed decision makers of Debian some unknown time ago
>> decided that Pi and *Pine* stuff won't be supported by Debian.
> This is the second time you've stated this, without really adding
> meaningful content to t
On September 12, 2021 2:47:38 PM UTC, "Andrew M.A. Cater"
wrote:
nice summary, Andy. a couple of things that i feel are important to add. first
(i accidentally trimmed context) is about debian package distribution.
for those people unfamiliar with it, who have been used to other package
m
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:40:49PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-09-10, LinAdmin wrote:
> > The unnamed decision makers of Debian some unknown time ago
> > decided that Pi and *Pine* stuff won't be supported by Debian.
>
> This is the second time you've stated this, without really addi
5 matches
Mail list logo