Re: Final patch

* Denis Barbier [2004-07-05 00:13:55+0200] > On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 12:13:10PM +0300, Recai Oktas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After getting success reports from Christian (French keyboard) and > > Eugeniy (Ukrainian keyboard), I prepared a single patch which applies > > cleanly to the current kbd-ch

[D-I Manual] Build log for en (05 Jul 2004)

A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN. There were no errors during the build process. The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully. A log of the build is available at: - http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log === If you would prefer this

Re: Ideas thrown around for Fully Automated Installations

On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 12:34:40PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > > Hi *! > > Another idea I'd like to throw in is to also keep an eye on m23 and coordinate > ideas. > m23 offers a complete software distribution system for debian. Notice that neither m23 nor FAI, both projects that where suggest

DONATION: Old world PowerMac-clone (upgraded to G3)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (I am sending this to -boot per tbm's suggestion). Hi, Since I am in the process of moving out to my own flat, I'm trying to figure out what I actually need to take with me... So I have this old-world PowerMac clone (Umax Apus 2000, same as an Sup

Re: base_sys.tar .udeb ?

On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 06:34:41PM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > Has anyone created a udeb that will install the base system from a tar > file? It sounds like it would be a fairly small modification to base-installer, although I don't know where you'd ask the question. -- Colin Watson

Bug#257663: partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install

Karl Hegbloom написав: > package: partman-lvm > severity: normal > > There should be a check that / is not a logical volume since the > mkinitrd does not support that. initrd-tools should support root on lvm. What version of installer do you use? > Grub probably doesn't either, right? > Grub doe

Bug#257663: partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install

On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:40:14PM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > package: partman-lvm > severity: normal > > There should be a check that / is not a logical volume since the > mkinitrd does not support that. Are you sure that this is still a problem? base-installer (0.085) unstable; urgency=low

Important information for you. Read it immediately !

Spam detection software, running on the system "murphy.debian.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that sys

These points on homes won't last forever

Spam detection software, running on the system "murphy.debian.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that sys

Bug#257687: rootskel: Missing S33framebuffer-module-linux-i386

Package: rootskel Severity: grave Version: 0.79 rootskel v0.79 is broken for i386. This package misses /lib/debian-installer.d/S33framebuffer-module-linux-i386, this file is key component for i386 i18n installer. I found tiny (but grave) mistake in Makefile and commited already. Please upload v0.

Processed: tagging 257687

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 257687 pending Bug#257687: rootskel: Missing S33framebuffer-module-linux-i386 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#257693: netcfg: fails when multiple interfaces available and DEBCONF_PRIORITY=critical

Package: netcfg Version: 0.71 Severity: normal If the debconf priority is critical and multiple interfaces are available, netcfg only asks which interface to use at high priority, so it fails. Trying again works fine, as the error causes the priority to be dropped. There may be other instances of

Bug#228839: debconf: Could you change default priority to 'high'?

Package: debconf Version: 1.4.29 Severity: wishlist I'm sorry for bring up again about priority issue. This wishlist is similar with #228839, but JoeyH looks don't want to provide priority question in base-config. After test and test, and as user's view, I think it is better that debconf uses 'hi

Bug#228839: debconf: Could you change default priority to 'high'?

Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: debconf > Version: 1.4.29 > Severity: wishlist > > I'm sorry for bring up again about priority issue. > This wishlist is similar with #228839, but JoeyH looks don't > want to provide priority question in base-config. I think we could have a quit

Debian Installer IRC meeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC

As already pre-announced by Joey Hess in debian-boot, an opened meeting of the Debian Installer "team" ("team" is very vague here, everyone can attend of course) will happen on IRC. Servers: freenode.net (just point your client to irc.debian.org) Channel: #debian-boot Time  : Tuesday July 6th, 20

Installing Debian on PPC Mac

From a previous discussion – attached below… Given that the error can be hunted down and corrected, what is a person to do with a computer that apparently won’t boot from HDD, floppy or CD?  It seems I’m stuck here with a failed installation! Help!!   (Please cc: this email address

Processing of rootskel_0.80_powerpc.changes

rootskel_0.80_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel_0.80.dsc rootskel_0.80.tar.gz rootskel_0.80_powerpc.udeb rootskel-bootfloppy_0.80_powerpc.udeb rootskel-locale_0.80_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#228839: Bug#257704: debconf: Could you change default priority to 'high'?

Kenshi Muto wrote: > I'm sorry for bring up again about priority issue. > This wishlist is similar with #228839, but JoeyH looks don't > want to provide priority question in base-config. I do plan to change debconf's default priority, but not until after the sarge release. I know that there are va

Bug#257687: marked as done (rootskel: Missing S33framebuffer-module-linux-i386)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 11:32:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#257687: fixed in rootskel 0.80 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

rootskel_0.80_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: rootskel-bootfloppy_0.80_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.80_powerpc.udeb rootskel-locale_0.80_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.80_powerpc.udeb rootskel_0.80.dsc to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.80.dsc rootskel_0.80.tar.gz to pool

Re: Installing Debian on PPC Mac

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 10:52:04AM -0400, J. Richard Miller wrote: > >From a previous discussion - attached below. > > Given that the error can be hunted down and corrected, what is a person to > do with a computer that apparently won't boot from HDD, floppy or CD? What model again is your pmac

Re: Please don't edit changelogs when committing d-i translations

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:01:57PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > I noticed your commit of an updated sq.po to yaboot-installer. Thanks > for the translation! However, could you please not edit debian/changelog > when committing updated translations in the debian-installer repository? > We update the

Processing of base-installer_0.088_powerpc.changes

base-installer_0.088_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_0.088.dsc base-installer_0.088.tar.gz base-installer_0.088_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

base-installer_0.088_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-installer_0.088.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.088.dsc base-installer_0.088.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.088.tar.gz base-installer_0.088_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.088_powerpc.udeb Announcing to [EMA

Bug#257663: partman-lvm: / on lv does fails at kernel install

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 12:43 +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > Karl Hegbloom написав: > > package: partman-lvm > > severity: normal > > > > There should be a check that / is not a logical volume since the > > mkinitrd does not support that. > initrd-tools should support root on lvm. What versio

Bug#257301: marked as done (d-i: default kernel choice on s390 is wrong)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 13:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#257301: fixed in base-installer 0.088 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

MS Encarta Encyclopedia Delux 2004 (3CD)$80

vxyayfx Name Brand Software at Wholesale price. 50-60 USD: Windows XP Professional Microsoft Office 2003 Professional Adobe Photoshop MacroMedia Studio MX MS SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Save your company thousands of dollars when it needs software That promotion just got closer... wait there i

Modified patch for "plus symbols" problem

* Recai Oktas [2004-07-05 10:16:30+0300] [...] > > Index: packages/kbd-chooser/getfd.c > > === > > --- packages/kbd-chooser/getfd.c(revision 17443) > > +++ packages/kbd-chooser/getfd.c(working copy) > > @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ > > }

Bug#257743: install on G5 fails at Loading AT Keyboard

Package: installation-reports Version: 20040704 I used http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040704/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso and booted with install-power4-2.6 The kernel initializes (penguin screen) until i see the line: Loading AT keyboard module where it freezes. --

debian-installer_20040701_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debian-installer-manual_20040701_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-manual_20040701_i386.deb debian-installer_20040701.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040701.dsc debian-installer_20040701.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-in

Processed: reassign 230436 to atmelwlandriver-sources, tagging 230436 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 230436 atmelwlandriver-sources Bug#230436: FWD: installing Sarge with F5D6050 Warning: Unknown package 'atmelwlandriver-sources' Bug reassigned from package `installation-r

Processed: severity of 256389 is normal, tagging 256389

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 256389 normal Bug#256389: installation-reports: loading scsi drivers during netboot Severity set to `normal'. > tags 256389 moreinfo Bug#256389: installation-reports: load

Processed: tagging 234162

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 234162 moreinfo Bug#234162: INSTALL REPORT There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: tagging 229772

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 229772 moreinfo Bug#229772: install report on powerbook 12" There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: reassign 231432 to hw-detect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231432 hw-detect Bug#231432: debian-installer-demo: Installer doesn't detect my IDE drive anymore Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'. > End

Processed: tagging 234605

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 234605 moreinfo Bug#234605: Package: installation-reports Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Processed: reassign 257743 to kernel-image-2.4.25-power4-pmac

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 257743 kernel-image-2.4.25-power4-pmac Bug#257743: install on G5 fails at Loading AT Keyboard Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.25-po

Processed: reassign 230552 to debian-installer-manual, tagging 230552

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 230552 debian-installer-manual Bug#230552: installation report: IBM Thinkpad X23 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer-manual'. > tags 23

Processed: tagging 233540, reassign 233540 to main-menu ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 233540 d-i Bug#233540: Installer report and trashing of existing install There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > reassign 233540 main-menu Bug#233540: Installer report and t

Processed: severity of 256905 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 256905 normal Bug#256905: installation-reports: can't mount the CD after hardware detection Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Processed: tagging 234506

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 234506 moreinfo Bug#234506: Package: installation-reports There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: reassign 232116 to kbd-chooser, tagging 232116, retitle 232116 to use be-latin1 for nl_BE

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 232116 kbd-chooser Bug#232116: success, but a partitioning problem (and some Dutch translation remarks) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kbd-chooser'.

Processed: reassign 231836 to netcfg, tagging 231836

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231836 netcfg Bug#231836: regression with plip Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'. > tags 231836 d-i Bug#231836: regression with plip There wer

Processed: retitle 235096 to install to blank disk failed partitioning, tagging 235096

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 235096 install to blank disk failed partitioning Bug#235096: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > tags 235096 moreinfo Bug#235096: install to blank disk faile

Processed: cloning 233864, reassign -1 to man-db

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > clone 233864 -1 Bug#233864: kbd-chooser crash - man-db error Bug 233864 cloned as bug 257748. > reassign -1 man-db Bug#257748: kbd-chooser crash - man-db error Bug reassigned from

Processed: reassign 234887 to grub-installer, retitle 234887 to crash installing grub, tagging 234887

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 234887 grub-installer Bug#234887: Net install over HP ProLiant DL360 G3 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'. > retitle 234887 crash inst

Processed: retitle 236293 to aic7xxx problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 236293 aic7xxx problem Bug#236293: unresolved symbols when insmod 8390 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: tagging 231836

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 231836 moreinfo Bug#231836: regression with plip Tags were: d-i Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: tagging 235418

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 235418 moreinfo Bug#235418: Various blocking problems installing on a RAID server -- d-i snapshot of 23/02/2004 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message,

Processed: retitle 236142 to Swedish translation problems, tagging 236142

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 236142 Swedish translation problems Bug#236142: Changed Bug title. > tags 236142 moreinfo Bug#236142: Swedish translation problems There were no tags set. Tags added: more

Processed: tagging 227917

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 227917 moreinfo Bug#227917: Boot fails on Alpha DS 10 with illegal instruction There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: submitter 230445

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > submitter 230445 Markus Amersdorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#230445: FWD: "INSTALL REPORT" d-i Changed Bug submitter from Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Markus Amersdorfer <[EMAIL

Processed: reassign 231949 to netcfg, tagging 231949

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 231949 netcfg Bug#231949: Debian Installation Report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'. > tags 231949 d-i moreinfo Bug#231949: Debian Installa

Processed: tagging 230977

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 230977 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#230977: installation-reports Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: tagging 231086, retitle 231086 to network config failure with cable plugged in, tagging 231086 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 231086 moreinfo Bug#231086: Could not get sarge installer to boot on a TOSHIBA TECRA 8200 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > retitle 231086 network config failure

Processed: tagging 230630

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 230630 moreinfo Bug#230630: SCSI HD, installation with bootfloppy and usb flash stick, i386 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#254994: marked as done (installation-reports: expert26 is TO MUCH, linux26 is not enough)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:29:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#239270: marked as done (During the install I selected US, The Netherlands, US American as keyboard layout and then continued the install. At the end when you can opped to run stuff like tasksel I did one install with and one without running tasksel. Then you get the "Thank you for ...." screen and then the prompt popsup, yet above the prompt there was the following message: "error: Should never end up here using 'ANSI_X3.4-1968'". The guy's at #debian-boot asked me to post this bug report and told me that the bug must come from /usr/sbin/termcap. I don't know this, but maybe it a good pointer. They also asked me to add the /var/log/installer.log and /etc/locale.gen file. I don't know how to add those, but if needed I will mail them on request (By e-mail).)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:27:31 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line I am closing this bug report, because it has been fixed. By the way, email has a subject field, and a body. You're not supposed to put the entire email in the subject field, because that looks s

Bug#236499: marked as done (installation-reports: debian-installer beta2 (daily) March 5)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:46:57 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#236128: marked as done ()

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:42:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#236122: marked as done (debian installer report)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:40:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#235544: marked as done (Debian-installer)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:39:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#235398: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:34:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#234775: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:24:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#235115: marked as done (Debian Installation Report)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:33:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing successful report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#234000: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:14:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#234492: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:15:24 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#233859: marked as done (Debian-Installer)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:10:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#232937: marked as done (installation report: Failure 3)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:02:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#233257: marked as done (Installation Report: alpha/20040216 on XP1000)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:06:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#232877: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:01:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#232855: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT (d-i))

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:00:00 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#232427: marked as done (debian-installer: powerpc kernel-image not found)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:57:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#232671: marked as done (lilo & grub wont install on a single-ide-disk system when disk is on slave)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:59:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#231817: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:49:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#231389: marked as done (hang at hardware detection. pcmcia related)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:46:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#230871: marked as done (Successful install (after modifing "sarge" script) using snapshot 20040126 sarge-i386-netinst.iso)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:39:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#230442: marked as done (FWD: Bug#228271: INSTALL REPORT - d-i Beta 2: Broken "stable" installation over net)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:23:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#230447: marked as done (FWD: Bug#229113: Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:28:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#230450: marked as done (FWD: Slight funny with debian installer)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:29:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#230291: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:19:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing old report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#234768: marked as done (Installation Report (Failed horribly))

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:23:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing this report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#231912: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:50:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#234581: marked as done (iso doesn't checksum)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:19:21 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#254808: please retry with current daily build

Since you reported this problem with your sparc being unable to boot the sid_d-i netinst, I know some things have changed with silo and the installer. Can you try again with the current version? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#230445: please retry

This January, you reported some problems with the debian installer on your HP Pavilion. I think all of them are fixed, except possibly the VIA-Rhine-II NIC not working. Can you try again with a current version of the debian installer, and see if it works? You don't need to complete the install, jus

Bug#227917: please retry

You reported an illegal instruction and kernel panic on boot with the debian installer. Could you please retry with the lastest images? If this bug still exists with current d-i images, it should probably be reassigned to the appropriate kernel package. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description:

Bug#229772: please retry with current image

In January you reported problems installing on your powerbook with the debian installer. Could you please retry with the current images, and verify that all the problems you encountered have been fixed? It seems quite likely to me that they have been, so if we don't hear back from you, I'll close t

Bug#235418: note

I've verified (by inspection) that current discover1-data loads the correct dmfe driver for the PCI id of the davicom network card. I don't know about the rest, we need followup from the bug submitter. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#230552: documentation problem

I think that this is a documentation problem. There should be somesthing in the installation manual that explains that the installer system is set up to use discover and hotplug for automatic hardware detection, and that if intermediate users don't like all these "useless" modules to be loaded, the

Bug#256905: well

> attempt to access beyond end of devive > 16:40: rw=0, want=899731, limit=899698 > isofs_fill_super: bread failed, ... There are only a few things this could be. It's best to assume it's not a kernel problem until you've checked basic things like whether you downloaded the complete iso, whether i

Bug#256389: more information needed

You don't say what version of the installer you were using (the url it was downloaded from). Probably you're using beta4 or something, that has a mismatch with the kernel modules currently available on the mirrors. When operating properly, the netboot installer downloads additional kernel modules f

Bug#221504: marked as done (Install on HP ZE5155)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:12:33 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#230455: marked as done (FWD: Install Report [Failed Install])

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:30:35 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#230590: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:35:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#233173: marked as done (Sarge netinst report)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:03:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#232234: marked as done (installation report)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:55:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#232067: marked as done (installation-report)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:52:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#230933: marked as done (installation-reports: 2004-02-02 IBM thinkpad X30 net install lilo failed)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:41:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line no response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#232462: marked as done (beta2 installation test)

Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:58:20 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

  1   2   >