Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:52:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2004 18:22:57 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 10 10:22:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailgate5.cinetic.de [217.72.192.165] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AqcXB-0007M8-00; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:22:57 -0800 Received: from web.de (fmomail01.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.1.45]) by mailgate5.cinetic.de (8.11.6p2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id i1AIMPQ10762 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:22:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:22:25 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?"Olaf=20J=E4ger"?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation-report Precedence: fm-user MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_10 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_10 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst= /i386/daily/sarge-i386-netinst.iso 08-Feb-2004 13:50 uname -a: unknown Date: 10. February 2004 Method: boot und installation from image above Machine: IBM Thinkpad A21m Processor: PIII 800 Memory: 128 MB Root Device: /dev/hda3 Root Size/partition table: 9 GB + 256MB swap (/dev/hda2) Output of lspci: unknown Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked: [O] Configure network HW: [E] Config network: [E] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems: [O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system: [O] Install boot loader: [E] Reboot: [E] [O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it Comments/Problems: 1st: The Thinkpad has no Network card, the hardware-detection fails=85 it=92s corre= ct. The installer asks for the correct module for the nic and I selected =93= none of the above=94. The installer didn=B4t step to the next option, so I sel= ected manually the next step but the installer asks permanently for the ri= ght module for the nic. It can=92t remember that I have selected =93none of th= e above=94. 2nd: The boot-loader-installation runs without an errormessage, but the /boot d= irectory is empty and /vmlinuz doesn=92t exist. The point =93Finish the installation and reboot=94 fails, the installer asks m= e again for the nic-module. When I select =93reboot system=94, the boot process fails, probably because th= ere is no /vmlinuz. Kind Regards Olaf =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F Erdbeben im Iran: Zehntausende Kinder brauchen Hilfe. UNICEF hilft den Kindern - helfen Sie mit! https://www.unicef.de/spe/spe=5F03.php --------------------------------------- Received: (at 232067-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 19:54:07 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 12:54:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BhZXT-0007nD-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:54:07 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-133.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DBD18D84 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:50:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5145F6EE57; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:52:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:52:42 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No response from bug submitter. --=20 see shy jo --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA6ZVpd8HHehbQuO8RAkMiAJ4mUdAq1weF6dHD9U4gbxg08hF7CACgv/4G 9UuGWqeV/zWOP7rw09TIU4g= =d/9L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]