Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:17:22 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line sparc ultra 30 install success -- silo problem seems fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
[Frans Pop]
If you would prefer this message to be send somewhere else,
please send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a
better place to send such autogenerated message. It is the address
where all the commit messages are sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Sven,
Sven Luther said:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:28:46AM +0900, Jerome Walter wrote:
Mmmh, i did try netboot. But kernel gets stuck to Now booting kernel
too...
Well, but it makes debugging easier and
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Hi Sven,
Sven Luther said:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:28:46AM +0900, Jerome Walter wrote:
Mmmh, i did try netboot. But kernel gets stuck to Now
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 01:51:50AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Sven,
You didn't ask for my opinion, but here it is anyway...
Well, not, but i mailed to debian-boot, so ...
As a user, I think splitting netinst/businesscard into separate 2.4
and 2.6 isos is a wonderful idea. The fewer
Sven Luther said:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
Could you please try netbooting
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:28:15AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
Sven Luther said:
Could you please try netbooting
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 02:19:12PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
SL 1003scsincr53c8xx 53c825
SL data class='linux'
SL data version='[2.6,inf)' class='module'
SL data class='name'sym53c8xx/data
SL /data
SL data version='[2.2,2.6)'
SL 1003scsincr53c8xx 53c825
SL data class='linux'
SL data version='[2.6,inf)' class='module'
SL data class='name'sym53c8xx/data
SL /data
SL data version='[2.2,2.6)' class='module'
SL data class='name'ncr53c8xx/data
SL /data
SL So, this means that for 2.4, ncr53c8xx gets loaded, and for 2.6 and
SL discover2, sym53c8xx gets loaded, while 2.6 and discover1 gets loaded.
Oops, I was wrong ith the last mail - the new and correct driver is
sym53c8xx in 2.6 and sym53c8xx_2 in later 2.4 kernels.
--
Meelis Roos
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 July 2004 09:27, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Frans Pop]
If you would prefer this message to be send somewhere else,
please send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a
better place to send such
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040716,
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/20040716/sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso
Linux alphabox 2.4.26-1-generic #2 Sat May 1 16:31:16 EST 2004 alpha
GNU/Linux
Date: Sun Jul 18 13:54:13 CEST 2004
[Frans Pop]
Where do messages send to that address end up?
In the mailbox of all the subscribers. :)
I do not remember how to subscribe, but it should be documented on the
debian web site somewhere.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040716/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004/07/17
Method: installed from netinst cd. Boot from
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040716 sarge netinst (nightly)
uname -a: Linux cpp 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 17 July 2004, ~15:00+
Method: Burned sarge-i386-netinst.iso to a CDR/W and booted from it;
booted with expert26
Dis(8907deaa)con(ab3fbfca)tinue
rC78w/aXGyV0V48Th0B1.jX1lcDiR1ruQMP1DhI9r/otwqT0
If you can run one business well, you can run any business well.,There is nothing so annoying as a good example!!,The only certainty is that nothing is certain.,If what they are saying about you is true, mend your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 152152 + woody
Bug#152152: boot-floppies: bf2.4 kernel may need an (security) update
Tags were: security
Tags added: woody
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
At this weekend's meeting[1] we decided to try to make a release by the
end of this month. Here is a timeline for the release.
19 July udebs in sid are synced to sarge (first sync)
20 July string freeze begins, no changed templates until release
20 July cut test candidate
languagechooser 1.26
udpkg 0.024
sata-modules-2.4.26-1-386-di 0.64
libnss-dns-udeb 2.3.2.ds1-13
cdrom-checker 0.29
lowmemcheck 0.11
console-keymaps-usb 2002.12.04dbs-42
cdrom-retriever 0.29
main-menu 0.071
di-utils-shell 0.56
di-utils 0.56
usb-modules-2.4.26-1-386-di 0.64
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 18.07.04
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: not possible,
Date: 18.07.04
Method: Installation over sarge businesscard tc1,CD-Rom, downloading from
Hello,
This is the first log file.
hdparm was not found.
Regards.
Andre Felipe
info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4480B;/dev/hdb
info: /bin/report-hw: discover: via-rhine;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT6105
[Rhine-III];
info: /bin/report-hw: discover:
Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-core.o
Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o
Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/kernel/drivers/usb/storage/usb-storage.o
insmodide-core
insmodscsi_mod
insmodusb-storage
Using
Hello translators,
we have scheduled the string freeze for the next release to
Tuesday, 20th July to Saturday, 24th July
Please take the chance to update and improve your translations.
See also the timeline:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/07/msg01541.html
Well, we have 3
Hello,
Road Runner has received your e-mail, but is currently unable to process
it further as it is missing some required information. Please read this
reply to find out what information that we require in order to process
your complaint.
If you are reporting an e-mail related incident, it is
Package: grub-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
grub-installer fails to install, with the following message in syslog:
Jul 18 20:45:52 main-menu[298]: (process:25772):
/var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-installer.postinst: 7: get_serial_console: not found
Same thing happened here, exact same error
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: grub-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
grub-installer fails to install, with the following message in syslog:
Jul 18 20:45:52
cdebconf_0.69_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.69.dsc
cdebconf_0.69.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.69_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.69_s390.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.69_s390.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.69_s390.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.69_s390.udeb
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
get_serial_console() is a function defined further down in the script,
I guess this is the problem. Shell script functions need to be
defined before they are used.
which appearently can't be run in a subshell in ash like line 7 tries to
do:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Package: grub-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
grub-installer fails to install, with the following message in syslog:
Jul 18 20:45:52 main-menu[298]: (process:25772):
/var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-installer.postinst: 7:
Continuing my I have no net access tests..:-)
I just ran a full base system install with a netinst ISO image under
VmWare. This time priority was low.
I finished the installation after...74 questions. 43 in 1st stage and
31 in 2n stage.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I was away from any mail access but with my laptop, I took the
opportunity of testing d-i with critical priority (under VmWare,
with a working DHCP environment).
This works pretty good indeed. The only asked questions are:
1st stage:
-language
-country
-use entire disk
-accept partitioning
rootskel_0.86_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.86.dsc
rootskel_0.86.tar.gz
rootskel_0.86_s390.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.86_s390.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.86_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
tag 259950 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:07:16 +0200
Source: rootskel
Binary: rootskel-locale rootskel-bootfloppy
Package: exim4
Severity: wishlist
The screen which allows choosing the type of configuration is the only one
shown during a default Debian Installer base system install.
It comes immediately after other d-i screen and the current wording does not
make obvious that this screen is about
Package: ddetect
Severity: minor
When doing the installation at medium or low priority, the questions about
PCMCIA being started or not and PCMCIA address range are asked up to 3 times
(at CD detection phase, network hardware detection phase, and hard disk
detection phase).
I suggest keeping
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040717/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
install-power4-2.6
uname -a: (post install) Linux three 2.6.6 #2 SMP Sun Jul 18
13:01:19 EDT 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-7-17
Method: boot from cd
Package: countrychooser
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
There is no real motivation in asking the country choice at critical
priority as a reasonable default may be give by languagechooser.
The following patches to languagechooser languagelist (1st patch) and
countrychooser postinst (2nd patch)
Dennis Stampfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello translators,
we have scheduled the string freeze for the next release to
Tuesday, 20th July to Saturday, 24th July
Please take the chance to update and improve your translations.
See also the timeline:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 259950 + fixed
Bug#259950: rootskel: should try to enable framebuffer only on virtual console
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.86_s390.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.86_s390.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.86_s390.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.86_s390.udeb
rootskel_0.86.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.86.dsc
rootskel_0.86.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.69_s390.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.69_s390.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.69_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.69_all.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.69_s390.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.69_s390.udeb
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
After a normal install with debian-installer of sarge, I
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 08:44:22PM +0200, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
Hello translators,
we have scheduled the string freeze for the next release to
Tuesday, 20th July to Saturday, 24th July
Please take the chance to update and improve your translations.
See also the timeline:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:22:29PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Doing touch /bin/get_serial_console ; chmod +x /bin/get_serial_console
makes the package work.
AFAICS this papers only over the problem, and fails for serial installs.
Yes, of course, it was only intended to show that the
grub-installer_0.52_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_0.52.dsc
grub-installer_0.52.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.52_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 July 2004 19:58, Joey Hess wrote:
At this weekend's meeting[1] we decided to try to make a release by the
end of this month. Here is a timeline for the release.
I'm afraid I won't be able to do any testing on this release as
I'm
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:17:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260136: fixed in grub-installer 0.52
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello,
Below are some BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE translated strings needing corrections.
They are from phase 1 and 2, and may be out of order. (sorry my messy notes).
some point the screen. The three periods are not part of the strings.
Regards.
Andre Felipe
...método de uso: formatar a parição...
Accepted:
grub-installer_0.52.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.52.dsc
grub-installer_0.52.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.52.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.52_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.52_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 July 2004 09:27, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I believe [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a
better place to send such autogenerated message. It is the address
where all the commit messages are sent.
I see two main reasons why I would prefer
I have forwarded the pt_BR translation errors to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so they may be picked up there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:45:43 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260143: installation-reports: Desktop choice for gdm over ruled
by kdm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Christian Perrier wrote:
When doing the installation at medium or low priority, the questions about
PCMCIA being started or not and PCMCIA address range are asked up to 3 times
(at CD detection phase, network hardware detection phase, and hard disk
detection phase).
I suggest keeping track
zipl-installer_0.0.2_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zipl-installer_0.0.2.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.2.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.2_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
s390-dasd_0.0.7_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-dasd_0.0.7.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.7.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.7_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
s390-netdevice_0.0.6_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.6.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.6.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.6_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#259604: fixed in s390-netdevice 0.0.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:02:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257174: fixed in s390-dasd 0.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#256258: fixed in zipl-installer 0.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257212: fixed in zipl-installer 0.0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258430: fixed in s390-netdevice 0.0.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258108: fixed in s390-netdevice 0.0.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
partman-auto_24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_24.dsc
partman-auto_24.tar.gz
partman-auto_24_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
lvmcfg_0.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lvmcfg_0.33.dsc
lvmcfg_0.33.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.33_all.udeb
lvmcfg-utils_0.33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
autopartkit_0.87_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
autopartkit_0.87.dsc
autopartkit_0.87.tar.gz
autopartkit_0.87_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
bugreporter-udeb_0.28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bugreporter-udeb_0.28.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_0.28.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_0.28_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman_41_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_41.dsc
partman_41.tar.gz
partman_41_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
s390-netdevice_0.0.6_s390.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
zipl-installer_0.0.2.dsc
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.2.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.2.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.2_s390.udeb
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.2_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Accepted:
s390-dasd_0.0.7.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.7.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.7.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.7.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.7_s390.udeb
to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.7_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 257174
Thank you
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.6.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.6.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.6.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.6_s390.udeb
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.6_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 09:58:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The following are over 90%, too: it, cy, zh_CN, nb
Over 80%: sl, sv, gl
Over 50%: ar, fa
Others: ga 11%, vi 10%, en 10%, se and lv 1%, sr and hr 0%. hr will jump
up the next days...
Aeh, support for english is at
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 01:09:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'm afraid that I'm currently working on dropping everyone down to 99%.
I've added several new templates to aboot-installer in the last 24
hours, and am about to commit some changes to a couple of others. I
promise I'll be done
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 250145 + fixed
Bug#250145: lv_delete shows VGs even if they have no LVs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
tag 254629 + fixed
Bug#254629: doesn't tell how to switch to the third console
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:17:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254905: fixed in partman-auto 24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 250145 + fixed
tag 254629 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:55:39 -0400
Source: lvmcfg
Binary: lvmcfg lvmcfg-utils
Accepted:
lvmcfg-utils_0.33_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg-utils_0.33_all.udeb
lvmcfg_0.33.dsc
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.33.dsc
lvmcfg_0.33.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.33.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.33_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.33_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Accepted:
autopartkit_0.87.dsc
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.87.dsc
autopartkit_0.87.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.87.tar.gz
autopartkit_0.87_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.87_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your
Accepted:
bugreporter-udeb_0.28.dsc
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.28.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_0.28.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.28.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_0.28_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.28_all.udeb
Announcing to
Accepted:
partman-auto_24.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_24.dsc
partman-auto_24.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_24.tar.gz
partman-auto_24_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_24_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 254905
Thank
Accepted:
partman_41.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_41.dsc
partman_41.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_41.tar.gz
partman_41_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_41_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
You can enable the support (even for motherboards without S.M.A.R.T) support with the
flag -e on the command line. If I'm not wrong, this is the default behaviour of it
startup
script.
(IMHO, the addition of smartmontools in the default debian installation is a good idea
for
most part of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 258981 debian-installer-manual
Bug#258981: network-console: partman does not show partitions
Bug reassigned from package `network-console' to `debian-installer-manual'.
retitle 258981 network-console: terminal needs to be in UTF8 mode
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:36:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#253536: fixed in debian-installer 20040715
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: official mirror (gd.tuwien.ac.at)
uname -a:Linux aptiva 2.6.6-1-686 #1 Wed May 12 14:57:57 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-06-30 18:46
Method: Downloaded Sarge Beta 4, 110 Mbytes ISO image
Machine: IBM Aptiva
Processor:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040710 netboot CD image
uname -a: Linux damiel 2.4.25-powerpc-small #1 mer avr 14 17:26:11 CEST 2004 ppc
GNU/Linux
Date: 20040712
Method: From CD image, no external access.
Machine: 15 Powerbook 1.5GHz
Processor: 1.5GHz
reassign 258981 debian-installer-manual
retitle 258981 network-console: terminal needs to be in UTF8 mode
thanks
On Saturday 17 July 2004 15:21, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
Try to use following command line to connect to d-i:
TERM=linux ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should be executed from a
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge powerpc tcl.1 9 June 2004
uname -a: Linux Homer 2.4.25-powerpc #1 mer avr 14 15:38:38 CEST 2004
ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 18 July 2004 circa 5pm BST
Method: Installed BootX 1.2.2 from http://penguinppc.org/projects/bootx/
copied initrd.gz
Accepted:
debian-installer-manual_20040715_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-manual_20040715_i386.deb
debian-installer_20040715.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040715.dsc
debian-installer_20040715.tar.gz
to
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:01:33 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of lvmcfg 0.33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:01:33 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of lvmcfg 0.33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Joey Hess wrote:
19 July udebs in sid are synced to sarge (first sync)
FWIW, this was moved up since James will be unavailable on Monday, and
it's just been done. (Except broken grub-installer.)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#250763: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:17:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#250763: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
discover1-data_1.2004.07.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1-data_1.2004.07.18.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.07.18.tar.gz
discover1-data_1.2004.07.18_all.deb
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.18_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote:
You can enable the support (even for motherboards without S.M.A.R.T) support with the
flag -e on the command line. If I'm not wrong, this is the default behaviour of it startup
script.
(IMHO, the addition of smartmontools in the default debian installation is a
Accepted:
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.18_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.07.18.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2004.07.18.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.07.18.tar.gz
to
hey!
I played with network-console (after copying/fixing the liraries). It's
really nice!
May it be a problem that now two interfaces exist for the installer? I
think of something like locking the interface on local-side when the
remote-installer gets startet and any action is taken remotely -
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:12:40 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line 221602 closed by grub-installer 0.51
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I solved the soundcard problem, and wanted to report my experience
just to set the record straight and maybe help others who have the
same problem. Nothing here should be considered a real bug.
The soundcard works after I did two things. BTW, I do not have an
actual soundcard, I am using the
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
