Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I got installation step failed at the step select a keyboard layout
when I selected the Belgian keyboard layout.
How to reproduce:
1. Download and dd the floppy images boot, root and net-drivers from
Hi,
What would it take, and is there any chance of getting into d-i at this late
stage, for d-i to support USB ethernet adapters?
I've finally gotten around to doing some tests on my VAIO (PCG-F590), which
doesn't have an ethernet adapter. Since I've been running wireless at home,
I usually use
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.00
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was testing the daily build of d-i from sarge on my laptop for a
change, and I have a wireless network, with WEP. I was prompted for a
WEP key, and I entered it in the format --nn, but from
inspection with iwconfig on VT2, the WEP key
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.00
Severity: minor
Hi,
I was testing d-i with my laptop, without the wireless card, with a USB
ethernet adapter. It doesn't seem to have detected the USB ethernet
adapter, and presented me with a list of drivers.
I note that the e100 driver has the same description as
Hello,
Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you
that you are app roved for a new home lo an with a 6.50% ra te
Your tracking number is # V6 512 019
You must visit the site below in 24 hrs to confirm your details.
http://loanwithme.com/?partid=moffob
Best Regards,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:25:30AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Because anonymous SVN checkout is currently broken for d-i, the 1st
stages statistics are also broken. I'll try to keep you posted with
possible changes.
Non anonymous checkout is possible, however, so you can still commit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 262626 ethdetect
Bug#262626: netcfg: description error for e100 driver
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `ethdetect'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 02:18:51AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 05:19:46PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I was testing d-i with my laptop, without the wireless card, with a USB
ethernet adapter. It doesn't seem to have detected the USB ethernet
adapter, and presented me
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:50:24PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:25:30AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Because anonymous SVN checkout is currently broken for d-i, the 1st
stages statistics are also broken. I'll try to keep you posted with
possible changes.
reassign 262626 ethdetect
thanks
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 05:19:46PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I was testing d-i with my laptop, without the wireless card, with a USB
ethernet adapter. It doesn't seem to have detected the USB ethernet
adapter, and presented me with a list of drivers.
I
Package: ethdetect
Version: 1.00
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Given the lateness of this request, this is the least intrusive way of
getting USB Ethernet adapter support into d-i...
Could you please add the following line to the devnames file that winds
up as /etc/network/devnames.gz:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:20:37PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
As you know, telnet package is client, not server.
I don't think we should remove telnet package, because telnet is
useful for really connect to other old machine, or analyze a network
application problem.
I'm trying to get
On Thursday, July 29, 2004, at 05:42 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 04:27 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:40:30PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Please, somebody, give it a try and let me know I'm not going
crazy. It doesn't take very long to get to the point
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:55:41 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240842: pcmcia network config failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2004 14:04:55 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#241106: base system install fails, iso-codes can't be found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2004 14:35:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#241850: no dhcp, otherwise success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
I have just installed another system, and took the time to try to
familiarise myself with the partitioning tool.
I was running a 2.6 kernel, and the install kernel's date is Jul 29 06:24.
The install target was a Pentium II, 350 Mhz, 64 Mb RAM and 3.2 Gbytes
of disk.
It seemed to me that the
Hey Thereuhj ,
Did you recieve my notificationfrom last week? I'm pleased to tell you
that you may be qualified for a home loan at 3.70% . Chances are this is
much better than your current home-loan
Use this for the site: Or http://aucbimo.info/prime/Timpana/index.htm
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040730 - from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/
uname -a: 2.6.7-1 i386
Date: 30 07 2004 - one hour
Method: netinst by ftp2.fr.debian.org
Machine: Asus A7N8X DeLuxe motherboard
Processor: AMD XP 2400+
Memory: 512
Lior Kaplan:
During the installation process, tasksel is shown and not aptitude.
Aptitude can be reached, but is described as an expert only tool. I don't
expect the normal user to use aptitude. But I do expect him to be able to
install multi l10n tasks.
But the installation process is
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I have just installed another system, and took the time to try to
familiarise myself with the partitioning tool.
I was running a 2.6 kernel, and the install kernel's date is Jul 29 06:24.
The install target was a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 262620 console-data
Bug#262620: debian-installer: installation step failed - select a keyboard layout
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `console-data'.
reassign 262620 Failed to load Belgian keyboard layout in d-i
Bug#262620:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 03:58:05PM +1000, James Mills wrote:
I do intend to get involved with the Development of Debian, I guess this
is one of the first steps... What's the process of contributing to the
Debian Installer project ? Are there SubVersion credentials to obtain ?
Yes, but it's
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 247670 [i386] [beta4] [netinst] mostly successful install
Bug#247670: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
retitle 247722 [i386] [beta4] [CD] broken /dev/ptmux
Bug#247722: Configuration error for Terminals with BETA 4 CD installer
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:04:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing successful report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:09:40 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:59:59 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
[Please keep this on the mailing list. It may be useful for other new
contributors.]
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 02:46:22AM +1000, James Mills wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 05:39:55PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 03:58:05PM +1000, James Mills wrote:
I do intend to get
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 262620 kbd-chooser
Bug#262620: Failed to load Belgian keyboard layout in d-i
Bug reassigned from package `console-data' to `kbd-chooser'.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 262620 d-i
Bug#262620: Failed to load Belgian keyboard layout in d-i
Tags were: fixed l10n d-i
Tags added: d-i
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Erinn Clark wrote:
Debian-installer-version: Daily build from:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/
I think that the problem is that this build is quite old and you're
using it with newer udebs. Prebaseconfig uses cdebconf functions
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Should do, but searching is more awkward.
Thanks.
[Please keep further questions on the mailing list, if you would.]
Shit. Does this list not have an explicit Reply-To header to the mailing
list address either ? THis is the 2nd
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040728/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux linux 2.4.19-4GB #6 Fri Feb 28 21:14:58 MST 2003 i686 unknown (SuSE
8.1-sarge)
Date: 2004-07-28 22:15
Method: netinst CD, boot from
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:25:26AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Well... here's an interesting observation!
My gateway is at a different address from my DNSserver.
(For what it's worth: Gateway=192.168.1.254, DNSserver=192.168.1.118)
I noticed that the non-DHCP network configuration step
debian-installer_20040801_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20040801.dsc
debian-installer_20040801.tar.gz
debian-installer-manual_20040801_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20040801_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: netboot daily from 01. August 2004
uname -a: Linux cobalt 2.4.26-r5k-cobalt #1 Sun Jun 13 22:32:36 UTC 2004 mips GNU/Linux
Date: Sun Aug 1 21:20:27 CEST 2004
Method: netboot with nfs, fetched packages from http mirror, no
Keith Hellman :
I went through the repartitioning by first removing all the partitions, then adding
back in a
root, swap, and two LVM physical volumes. When it came time to declare a volume
group however,
the name system failed. The error messgages on the third console suggest the
Thanks for the prompt reply!
On Sunday, August 1, 2004, at 01:55 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote:
If you do not CC [EMAIL PROTECTED], nobody except me will see
this.
I did that.
Would somebody please try this out on an i386? (DNSserver
address != Gateway address) And let me know if it breaks non-DHCP
Robert Lemmen wrote:
- after the reboot dialogs had different borders, before they were nicely
line-drawn, afterwards ugly umlauts
What language were you installing in, and were you using a serial
console or not? This sounds like an encoding problem.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:04:30PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
What language were you installing in, and were you using a serial
console or not? This sounds like an encoding problem.
i installed in english over screen, on the non-cobalt machine LC_CTYPE
is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cu robert
--
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 15:32:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#262266: fixed in debian-installer 20040801
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
debian-installer-manual_20040801_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-manual_20040801_i386.deb
debian-installer_20040801.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040801.dsc
debian-installer_20040801.tar.gz
to
Joey Hess:
yazdzik wrote:
expert26 hd=7296,255,63
I don't know if that parameter is a kernel boot parameter, or something
old and unimplemented left over in the help from the boot-floppies. If
the latter, I can remove it..
It's a kernel parameter in 2.4 according to
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-01 15:04]:
- after the reboot dialogs had different borders, before they were nicely
line-drawn, afterwards ugly umlauts
What language were you installing in, and were you using a serial
console or not? This sounds like an encoding problem.
It's a
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 31st of July 2004, current CD Image from
debian-installer page, i386 Version
uname -a: Linux starbase 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 31st of July 2004, 21:00
Method: Installation boot from CD, install from
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:52:20AM +1000, James Mills wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Should do, but searching is more awkward.
Thanks.
[Please keep further questions on the mailing list, if you would.]
Shit. Does this list not have an explicit
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:56:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
2) If there are actually some people interested in this (I am, so
that if is superfluous) should the program still located in the
debian-boot CVS and have debian-boot as maintainer address?
I don't see
i would leave the code old in the old repostry so the old history is
preserved
maybe add a notice there about the move though
-Original Message-
From: Frank Lichtenheld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank
Lichtenheld
Sent: 01 August 2004 23:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 10:45:59PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
It's a serial console problem. mjg59 and I are looking into it, but
we don't quite know what's going on (after we supposedly fixed this a
while ago, it appeared again).
interesting. tell me if there is anything i can do to
Package: partman
Version: 48
Installation using debian sarge 20040731 d-i netinst iso on a sparcstation5
system with one internal scsi hdd.
Partman menu offered me the choice to create a LVM partition, and I wanted to
try it, so I did the following :
- first I created a bootable reiserFS root
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Debian sarge-i386-netinst.iso Beta4
uname -a: Linux Jotunheim 2.4.26 #6 Sun Aug 1 00:34:43 EEST 2004 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: 31.07.2004
Method: Installed base system and downloaded some necessary stuff with
apt-get from
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-29 current from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a: Linux enoch.gear.dyndns.org 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04
EDT 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2004-07-30 19:30 AEST
Method: How did you install? From CD
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#256401: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#227691: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206203: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#191046: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#225204: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#127529: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#173734: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#191048: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#194926: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#178824: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 01 Aug 2004 20:17:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#233601: fixed in modconf 0.2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I have just installed another system, and took the time to try to
familiarise myself with the partitioning tool.
I was running a 2.6 kernel, and the install kernel's date is Jul 29 06:24.
The install
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
powerpc 20040724 businesscard OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the image
sid_d-i/powerpc/20040731/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
uname -a: The result of running uname -a
Package: partman-partitioning
Version: 24
Severity: important
I have two disks on my Sun SPARCstation 10, sda and sdb. sda is a 1 GB
drive which I chose to initialize with a fresh disklabel for the
purposes of testing.
However:
xSCSI1 (0,3,0) (sda) - 1.0 GB SEAGATE ST31200N SUN1.05 a
México D.F. a 1 de agosto del
2004
A quien corresponda:
Por medio de la presente quiero manifestar lo siguiente:
Soy un ciudadano que desea lo mejor para sus hijos. Y en ese animo estoy convencido
que el DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO
31 2004 00:27 Frederik Dannemare (a):
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241212
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems back in March, I would very much
appreciate it,
68 matches
Mail list logo
