Processed: Re: Bug#269154: Installation report: i386 businesscard iso from 20040825 on Dell Dimension XPS T450

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 269154 base-config Bug#269154: Installation report: i386 businesscard iso from 20040825 on Dell Dimension XPS T450 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'. severity 269154 wishlist Bug#269154: Installation report:

Bug#269154: Installation report: i386 businesscard iso from 20040825 on Dell Dimension XPS T450

2004-08-31 Thread Christian Perrier
reassign 269154 base-config severity 269154 wishlist retitle 269154 apt-setup should add a deb-src line for security updates tags 269154 d-i thanks I do have one question, though I'm not sure if this is the proper place to ask or not: The installer has me add locations to

Re: Bug#239111: Followup

2004-08-31 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:04:30AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: I was reinstalling my laptop yesterday and ran into this problem. I found that replacing all the xfs_freeze stuff with a single call of 'sync;sync;sync' would not cause the deadlock. Perhaps it is sufficient to freeze, then

Re: Partitioner defaults to MB instead of GB

2004-08-31 Thread Anton Zinoviev
Hi! Initialy it defaulted to bytes so people had to write 200m for swap or 6g for /usr. Changing bytes to megabytes was some progress but for gigabytes we need more time. ;-) Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Regarding the Storage server recipe in partman-auto

2004-08-31 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 12:29:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: However, parted_server.c in svn does not currently compile, so I've left partman itself out of this upload. I fixed this. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#269163: base install fails on HP ProLiant dl360g3 (using 20040830/netinst)

2004-08-31 Thread Matt Taggart
Package: installation-reports Version: 20040830/netinst Debian-installer-version: 20040830/netinst uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 unknown Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:07:31 -0700 Method: CD, fb console Machine: HP ProLiant dl360g3 Processor: dual socket

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:41:32AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: On Monday, August 30, 2004, at 04:41 AM, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: Sven Luther wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: Is it

Re: Debian and Ibm RS6000 7043-150

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:57:40PM +0200, Nicolas Raspail wrote: Hi, I've a problem installing Debian on my 7043-150 (powerpc 604e, chrp I Are you sure that this is a chrp, and not a prep machine ? think). I've tried the DI rc1 on sarge ppc and woody's bootdisks but I always have an error

Re: Partitioner defaults to MB instead of GB

2004-08-31 Thread Free Ekanayaka
|--== AZ == Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AZ Hi! AZ Initialy it defaulted to bytes so people had to write 200m for swap or AZ 6g for /usr. Changing bytes to megabytes was some progress but for AZ gigabytes we need more time. ;-) :) Maybe an explicit and visible indication

Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
New information: When starting the shell, it claims that hard disks are mounted under /target. But such a directory does not exist. The hard disk is detected - but under /dev/discs/disc0/disc. Issuing ln -s /dev/discs/disc0/disc /dev/hda makes fdisk recognize the partition table. But the

Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
Hi, I have just learnt that the bug I encountered when trying to install Sarge is known under #242114 (Finds no partition table on a disk with partition table recognisable by fdisk), and is 148 (!!) days old. Is there a means to find out what the status is, and when a fix can be expected?

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:19:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:41:32AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: On Monday, August 30, 2004, at 04:41 AM, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400,

Wrong kernel after install

2004-08-31 Thread Miguel Quaremme
Hello, I downloaded Debian-installer RC1(i386) and all went fine but the kernel installed was kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 while another one (kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686) should have been used instead. Here is a copy of my /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
Hi, I just have learnt from the bug report pages that the bug I encountered was also reported in Bug #247108: Doesn't see existing partition table and closed. But the bug is still there! In the meantime, I also have tried with rc1, but I found exactly the same behaviour: the partition manager

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:12:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have just learnt that the bug I encountered when trying to install Sarge is known under #242114 (Finds no partition table on a disk with partition table recognisable by fdisk), and is 148 (!!) days old. Is there a

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
Hi, On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Please try the (2.6) floppies at : http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31 Spitted out immediately, kernel is not loaded from floppy. If I mount the image, it only contains vmlinuz. As well as the

Debian Installation s390.

2004-08-31 Thread Tomasz Pijanowski
Hello, Can you give me any help (steps , links or instruction) how install debian S390 on mainframe (zSeries). Thanks for help Tomasz Pijanowski

Processed: reassign to d.i.

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 265845 debian-installer Bug#265845: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `alsa-base' to `debian-installer'. retitle 265845 Don't load OSS modules on boot? Bug#265845: installation-reports Changed Bug title. tags 265845 d-i

Bug#269204: [sparc] install report: Illegal Instruction, cursor was invisible

2004-08-31 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20040830/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux ikari.its.monash.edu.au 2.4.26-sparc32 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:18:47 PDT 2004 sparc GNU/Linux Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004

Bug#269208: Installer report (sparc)

2004-08-31 Thread Ben Burton
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: rc1, 2 Aug 2004, from ftp.debian.org. uname -a: Linux eclipse 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:39:17 PDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux Date: 30 Aug 2004 Method: CD-ROM installer (using cdrom-mini.iso), followed by net install

Bug#269206: [l10n] Updated Slovak translation of discover1

2004-08-31 Thread Peter Mann
Package: discover1 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Heyaaa!!! in attachement there is updated Slovak translation (sk.po) of discover1, please include. thanks -- 5o Peter.Mann at tuke.sk discover1-1.6.5_sk.tgz Description: GNU Unix tar archive

Debian, Parted 1.6.12, and your patches ...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
Guillaume: i think you where not the one who submitted your patch at http://xilun666.free.fr/parted-1.6.6-hfs-9.patch for inclusion in the debian parted package, but could you have a look at this all the same ? Hello, You have provided patches to be included in the debian parted packages, namely

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Please try the (2.6) floppies at : http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31 Spitted out immediately, kernel is not loaded from

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:44:28PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 12:22 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ?

RE: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
-Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 12:22 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure] On

Re: Debian, Parted 1.6.12, and your patches ...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:42:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: and see if your patches are to be discarded because already submitted upstream, or need to be modified ? To help you, here is a subset of the ChangeLog file of parted upstream between 1.6.9 and 1.6.12 : Notice for debian-boot folk,

RE: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
-Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:04 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning

Processing of linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63_source+m68k.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63.dsc linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63.tar.gz kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68k.udeb

linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.01_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di_0.01_sparc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di_0.01_sparc.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_0.01_sparc.udeb to

linux-kernel-di-ia64_0.56_ia64.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0.56_ia64.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0.56_ia64.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0.56_ia64.udeb to

linux-kernel-di-i386_0.67_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_0.67_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_0.67_i386.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_0.67_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_0.67_i386.udeb

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:00:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you provide the reported geometry on both a 2.4 kernel and a 2.6 kernel ? This is probably the infamous 2.6 geometry bug/feature/whatver. Geometry reported by what? fdisk -l? I could boot Knoppix once with kernel

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:45:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Please try the (2.6) floppies at :

linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63_source+m68k.changes is NEW

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68k.udeb

Bug#269227: partman-auto: do NOT set special mount options without any notification or/and policy change

2004-08-31 Thread Kenshi Muto
Package: partman-auto Severity: serious Version: 31 I found new partman-auto sets mount option for some partitions. - add noatime mount option in the atomic and home recipes. Thanks to Ryan Underwood, closes: #265295 - add mount options in the multi_user recipes: nodev

Bug#269225:

2004-08-31 Thread Marcos Pinto
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: RC1 31AUG04 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso uname -a: Linux peg 2.6.7 #1 Wed Jul 21 00:02:54 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 31AUG04 0947 EST Method: boot from cd. linux26

RE: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
-Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:38 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Please try the (2.6) floppies at : http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31 boot.img only contains vmlinuz and doesn't boot, ofonlyboot.img starts loading a kernel and ends with the tux/red cross.

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:13:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:38 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of

linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63_source+m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Sven Luther wrote: This should be fixed in 1.6.12 for which i am preparing packages, but it breaks binary compatibility, so using this is a no-go for sarge as i understand, as parted is part of base, which was frozen by start of august. It can probably be argued that this is a release critical

Processing of linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55_arm.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55.dsc linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb nic-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:10AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Sven Luther wrote: This should be fixed in 1.6.12 for which i am preparing packages, but it breaks binary compatibility, so using this is a no-go for sarge as i understand, as parted is part of base, which was frozen by start of

Re: Wrong kernel after install

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Miguel Quaremme wrote: I downloaded Debian-installer RC1(i386) and all went fine but the kernel installed was kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 while another one (kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686) should have been used instead. This is expected behavior if you were installing from a netinst CD, which only has

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:37:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:45 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of

Re: Red X -- not quite gone yet...

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Please try the (2.6) floppies at : http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31 boot.img only contains vmlinuz and doesn't boot,

RE: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
-Original Message- From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:45 PM To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning

linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55_arm.changes is NEW

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_0.55_arm.udeb standard debian-installer CDROM support This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel. (new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb standard debian-installer CDROM support This package contains core CDROM support

Processed: cloning 269163, reassign -1 to netcfg, tagging -1 ...

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 clone 269163 -1 Bug#269163: base install fails on HP ProLiant dl360g3 (using 20040830/netinst) Bug 269163 cloned as bug 269236. reassign -1 netcfg Bug#269236: base install fails on HP

Processing of partman_50_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
partman_50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman_50.dsc partman_50.tar.gz partman_50_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#269163: base install fails on HP ProLiant dl360g3 (using 20040830/netinst)

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Matt Taggart wrote: 0.) HP ProLiant systems have a remote management device called an intergrated Lights Out (iLO). This device intercepts the system's vga text and keyboard and makes it available via telnet. As long as the system stays in vga text mode it works great but if you try to use

Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Sven Luther wrote: I would much rather upload to sid, and let it go in hinted, but i suppose t-p-u is the way to go, i never was able to do so in the past though, and the 1.6.9-3.2 upload Matt tried also failed. parted | 1.6.9-3.2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,

Bug#259868: marked as done (partition size requested is not same as created size)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#259868: fixed in partman 50 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#265293: marked as done (The partman/confirm_nochanges dialog can be confusing)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#265293: fixed in partman 50 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

partman_50_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman_50.dsc to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50.dsc partman_50.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50.tar.gz partman_50_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 259868 265293 Thank you for your contribution to

linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55_arm.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_0.55_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_0.55_arm.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb

Bug#269253: debian-installer: /var set to mount with noexec, which breaks postinst/config/etc. scripts

2004-08-31 Thread Philip Hands
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Just did a test install with this: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso dated 31 Aug, and when asked for partitioning, selected Multi-User Workstation (IIRC -- the last of the partitioning

RE: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge: debian-installer partitioning failure]

2004-08-31 Thread mzenker
Hi Sven, this mail contains some lengthy, however truncated outputs. If you want to see the full files, I can send them to you off-list (unless you want them to be posted on the list). I hope that you will find the information you need to tell what the error was. I should perhaps paste a

Re: Regarding the Storage server recipe in partman-auto

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Anton Zinoviev wrote: I think the partman packages finaly have the shape/features I'd like them to have in sarge. I've had to revert all the mount option stuff in the new partman-auto, because it broke dpkg (#269253). I have to say, I'm somewhat dismayed by the number of apparently untested

Processed: severity of 269253 is grave, reassign 269253 to partman-auto

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 severity 269253 grave Bug#269253: debian-installer: /var set to mount with noexec, which breaks postinst/config/etc. scripts Severity set to `grave'. reassign 269253 partman-auto

Bug#268792: [m68k] [20040828, rc1(?)] [nativehd] Failure with Debian installer RC1 on Macintosh Quadra650

2004-08-31 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:51:01AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote: no http proxy configured otherwise. Booted with ramdisk_size=13000 debug=ser console=tty0 added to my 'normal' Linux/mac68k bootoptions (mac53c9x=1,0). cool, a serial install on a mac. The low memory mode textbox looked

Bug#268202: marked as done (partman-auto: multi-user and similar recipes should choose a bigger size for / with big disks)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:54:37 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Localization-config uploaded, 2 strings for translation

2004-08-31 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in Debian. It has been uploaded today to the Debian archive so that anyone can test. Debconf preseeding works

Processing of partman-auto_32_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-auto_32_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_32.dsc partman-auto_32.tar.gz partman-auto_32_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processing of lilo-installer_1.01_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
lilo-installer_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lilo-installer_1.01.dsc lilo-installer_1.01.tar.gz lilo-installer_1.01_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processing of partman-partitioning_26_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-partitioning_26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-partitioning_26.dsc partman-partitioning_26.tar.gz partman-partitioning_26_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Processing of partman-basicmethods_21_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-basicmethods_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-basicmethods_21.dsc partman-basicmethods_21.tar.gz partman-basicmethods_21_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#262531: FWIW

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
FWIW, lilo-installer has been hacked to work with either syntax of lvm device named. I have filed a bug on the lvm tools to work with either syntax. Which syntax partman-lvm should use, I don't know, leaving this bug open in case we should change it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description:

Bug#269227: marked as done (partman-auto: do NOT set special mount options without any notification or/and policy change)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:17:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#269227: fixed in partman-auto 32 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#269253: marked as done (debian-installer: /var set to mount with noexec, which breaks postinst/config/etc. scripts)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:17:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#269253: fixed in partman-auto 32 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

lilo-installer_1.01_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: lilo-installer_1.01.dsc to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.01.dsc lilo-installer_1.01.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.01.tar.gz lilo-installer_1.01_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.01_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL

partman-auto_32_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman-auto_32.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_32.dsc partman-auto_32.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_32.tar.gz partman-auto_32_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_32_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 269227 269253

Processing of grub-installer_1.02_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
grub-installer_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_1.02.dsc grub-installer_1.02.tar.gz grub-installer_1.02_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#266307: marked as done (Typo in french translation of debian-installer (grub ?))

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:32:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#266307: fixed in grub-installer 1.02 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

partman-partitioning_26_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman-partitioning_26.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_26.dsc partman-partitioning_26.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_26.tar.gz partman-partitioning_26_all.udeb to

grub-installer_1.02_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: grub-installer_1.02.dsc to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.02.dsc grub-installer_1.02.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.02.tar.gz grub-installer_1.02_i386.udeb to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.02_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL

partman-basicmethods_21_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman-basicmethods_21.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_21.dsc partman-basicmethods_21.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_21.tar.gz partman-basicmethods_21_all.udeb to

Bug#269138: RC1 worked

2004-08-31 Thread Tom Brown
Installing with Linux kwai 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux from an rc1 businesscard CD image worked without a problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-lvm_23_i386.changes

2004-08-31 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-lvm_23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-lvm_23.dsc partman-lvm_23.tar.gz partman-lvm_23_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Localization-config uploaded, 2 strings for translation

2004-08-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:52:18PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in Debian. It has been uploaded

Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 23

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 267677 + fixed Bug#267677: [RC1] Success: i386, root on LVM, in spite of complaint from d-i There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Bug#269206: [l10n] Updated Slovak translation of discover1

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 269206 + pending Bug#269206: [l10n] Updated Slovak translation of discover1 Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/svn contents

2004-08-31 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Question: Alioth README seems newer and correct for anonymous SVN checkout. Should I update Debian web site description? Background: I was wondering why I can not check out from SVN repository while others seems to have no issues. I was following Debian web page:

Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 23

2004-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
tag 267677 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:18:57 -0400 Source: partman-lvm Binary: partman-lvm Architecture: source all

partman-lvm_23_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: partman-lvm_23.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_23.dsc partman-lvm_23.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_23.tar.gz partman-lvm_23_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_23_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting bugs to severity fixed: 267677

Bug#269206: [l10n] Updated Slovak translation of discover1

2004-08-31 Thread Dennis Stampfer
tags 269206 + pending thanks On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:05:43PM +0200, Peter Mann wrote: Heyaaa!!! in attachement there is updated Slovak translation (sk.po) of discover1, please include. Thank you very much. I uploaded them to the CVS rep. Dennis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

CP1251 and termwrap

2004-08-31 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Hi, Bulgarian uses CP1251, and termwrap currently uses jfbterm for it. Is this really needed? For Russian's KOI8-R, nothing is done in termwrap. How KOI8-R is setup for stage 2, so that we make CP1251 to be setup in the same way? Regards, ogi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bulgarian languagelist entry is changed in SVN

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 261476 +pending Bug#261476: languagechooser entry for bulgarian Tags were: l10n d-i Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#267677: marked as done ([RC1] Success: i386, root on LVM, in spite of complaint from d-i)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:16:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#269278: HPPA Install Hangs

2004-08-31 Thread L. A. Linden Levy
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 08.29.04 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/hppa/current/sarge-hppa-netinst.iso uname -a: Date: 08.29.04 Method: boot from cd net install Machine: HP PA-RISC C180 Visualize Processor: $cat /proc/cpuinfo processor :

Processed: reassign 268580 to grub-installer

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 268580 grub-installer Bug#268580: GRUB hangs on first boot after base install Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `grub-installer'. End of message, stopping

Processed: reassign 268790 to boot-floppies

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 268790 boot-floppies Bug#268790: No way to create basedebs.tar from CD images set Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `boot-floppies'. End of message, stopping

Processed: reassign 268103 to boot-floppies

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 268103 boot-floppies Bug#268103: Bug in install procedure Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `boot-floppies'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: reassign 266861 to hw-detect

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 266861 hw-detect Bug#266861: debian-installer: Hang on toshiba S310CDS while detecting cdrom Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'. End of message,

Processed: reassign 265845 to discover1

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 265845 discover1 Bug#265845: Don't load OSS modules on boot? Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `discover1'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: tagging 264584

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 tags 264584 pending Bug#264584: debian-installer: Doesn't load thermal or fan ACPI modules in 2.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: reassign 266123 to quik-installer

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 266123 quik-installer Bug#266123: debian-installer: [powerpc] default ext3 isn't accepted by Quix and setting ext2 reformats, but doesn't reinstall base Bug reassigned from

Bug#267208: marked as done (please ask for http_proxy)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:38:50 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#265988: marked as done (needs a way to load configs from disk or network)

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:40:56 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing, preseeding implemented has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: reassign 259942 to installation-reports

2004-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 reassign 259942 installation-reports Bug#259942: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100 Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.

  1   2   >