On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:36:57 +0100 Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
I've attachd an updated patch if you want to try it. It now asks the
device for the min/max coordinates and uses normalized values
internally so it should behave the same on all touchpads.
[...]
I just
Package: debian-installer
When booting d-i and press F2 at the boot prompt, there
is a note:
You need at least 24MB of RAM to use this installer.
This is not exactly true:
There should be a requirement for the graphical installer,
too, as it needs more ram.
And in #401889 is mentioned,
There is no response from the first interaction - language choice isn't it? I
assumed the problem was keyboard since I last tried the (unofficial) AMD
download given that this appears to not be i586/i386 (though that should
run). The fact that the CD starts up at all and displays suggests
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: from CD
Image version: from cdimage.debian.org Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r4 Sarge -
Official sparc Binary-1 CD
Date: 8.11.06 15:36
Machine: Sun blade 100
Processor: Sparc 500MHz
Memory:640MGbt
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is
I can choose the language then the system will initialize Error the CD kann
nicht eingebunden werden
--
Have you tried to use the Debian Installer for Etch. Given that Etch
release is very close now, you will probably benefit from it by
installing your Sun machine with Etch directly.
You
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:11:54 +0100 Liniger Simon wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: from CD
Image version: from cdimage.debian.org Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r4 Sarge -
Official sparc Binary-1 CD
Detect CD: [x]
Comments/Problems:
I can choose the language
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB memory stick
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz
Date: 7. Dez. 2006
Machine: IBM Thinkpad X32
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz
Memory: 512 MB
Partitions:
/dev/hda1 JFS /
/dev/hda1
Douglas Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think, but am not sure, the problem wasn't that the grub package
wasn't installed but rather that it didn't end up in the MBR. I could
be wrong since the AMD installs packages in the blink of an eye (instead
of the rotation of the earth as on my
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 402276 + pending
Bug#402276: debian-installer: memory requirements on help page F2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 402276 + pending
thanks
On Saturday 09 December 2006 09:37, Holger Wansing wrote:
When booting d-i and press F2 at the boot prompt, there
is a note:
You need at least 24MB of RAM to use this installer.
This is not exactly true:
There should be a requirement for the graphical installer,
FYI, today i booted the patched g-i [1] image on an old PII, 128 Mb ram,
Virge DX2: vesafb failed to start and i was prompted to enter a
different vido mode (textual only), but the patch succeeded in falling
back to NEWT frontend.
cheers
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 12:11:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Douglas Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think, but am not sure, the problem wasn't that the grub package
wasn't installed but rather that it didn't end up in the MBR. I could
be wrong since the AMD installs packages in
sorry the programm doesen't work the normal mode and the epert mode are both
uncompatible with my system.
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Onscreen:
[!!] Grundsystem installieren
Debootstrap-Warnung
Warnung: Couldn't download package bash
[!!] Grundsystem installieren
Debootstrap-Warnung
Warnung: Couldn't download package libusb-0.1-4
[!!] Grundsystem installieren
Debootstrap-Warnung
Warnung: Failure trying to run:
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:31:49 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
This is not exactly true:
There should be a requirement for the graphical installer,
too, as it needs more ram.
The g-i has a separate check for available memory and should fall back
automatically to the NEWT frontend if the system has
On Saturday 09 December 2006 16:16, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I can't find the installation syslog; I thought it should be in
/var/log/installer-log.
The syslog for the installation can be found on the installed system as:
/var/log/installer/syslog
pgppxVaCkO57O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:45:55PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
*** On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:01:35AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Could you try reproducing this while installing *unstable* (you'll need a
businesscard or netboot install in expert mode for that).
If you add
export
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:02:03 +0100 Liniger Simon wrote:
sorry the programm doesen't work the normal mode and the epert
mode are both uncompatible with my system.
--
We need more informations on this incompatibility to solve
this:
what happens exactly or what doesn't happen?
In case that
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 05:05:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 16:16, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I can't find the installation syslog; I thought it should be in
/var/log/installer-log.
The syslog for the installation can be found on the installed system as:
Douglas Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 05:05:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 16:16, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I can't find the installation syslog; I thought it should be in
/var/log/installer-log.
The syslog for the installation can be found
On Saturday 09 December 2006 17:37, Douglas Tutty wrote:
/var/log/installer doesn't exist. I can't imagine that I would have
deleted it. Its not on my hd-media USB stick nor on any of my zip
disks.
It is only on the installed system if the installation completes
correctly. Apparently you
elilo-installer_1.8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
elilo-installer_1.8.dsc
elilo-installer_1.8.tar.gz
elilo-installer_1.8_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:50:02PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Douglas Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 05:05:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 16:16, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I can't find the installation syslog; I thought it should be in
On Saturday 09 December 2006 17:56, Douglas Tutty wrote:
If you want me to reinstall with CD1 netinst.iso let me know; also let
me know how to change the grub-installer postinst verboseness.
I've already explained that in an earlier post to this bug report.
pgprkYP4g9Eqp.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 05:50:37PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 17:37, Douglas Tutty wrote:
/var/log/installer doesn't exist. I can't imagine that I would have
deleted it. Its not on my hd-media USB stick nor on any of my zip
disks.
It is only on the installed
On Saturday 09 December 2006 16:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
So this is an argument pro writing such note (not contra):
People type installgui and don't get the graphical installer but
the newt one.
-- People writing a bugreport: graphical installer not
starting when typing
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:46:14 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402110: closing successful installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Op 08-12-2006 om 08:27 schreef Hendrixski:
Boot method: Net install CD onto both VirtualPC and VMWare server
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/alpha/iso-cd/debian-testing-alpha-netinst.iso
Date: 12/08/2006
Comments/Problems:
Both virtual machines did not detect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 402162 d-i in virtual machines
Bug#402162: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:36:12 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401832: closing this installation-report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
floppy-retriever_1.12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
floppy-retriever_1.12.dsc
floppy-retriever_1.12.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_1.12_all.udeb
load-floppy_1.12_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
mountfloppy_0.9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mountfloppy_0.9.dsc
mountfloppy_0.9.tar.gz
mountfloppy_0.9_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
elilo-installer_1.8.dsc
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.8.dsc
elilo-installer_1.8.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.8.tar.gz
elilo-installer_1.8_i386.udeb
to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.8_i386.udeb
Override entries for
Accepted:
floppy-retriever_1.12.dsc
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.12.dsc
floppy-retriever_1.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.12.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_1.12_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_1.12_all.udeb
Hi Rick,
On Saturday 09 December 2006 07:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
Curiously enough, the netinst CD does appear to have the missing
file...
Seems to me like the message is not about the presence of the file itself
but rather that it is not listed _inside_ the file
/cdrom/dists/etch/Release.
An patch will show if the I don't agree
was I strongly object adding that information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 09 December 2006 18:04, Douglas Tutty wrote:
Or it skipped it for me.
No, not possible. This can only happen if the step Finish installation
is not run at all, and the installer will never skip that by itself.
(Unless of course there is a bug in that step, but then you should have
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 402162 moreinfo
Bug#402162: d-i in virtual machines
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:20:04 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402162: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
mountfloppy_0.9.dsc
to pool/main/m/mountfloppy/mountfloppy_0.9.dsc
mountfloppy_0.9.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mountfloppy/mountfloppy_0.9.tar.gz
mountfloppy_0.9_all.udeb
to pool/main/m/mountfloppy/mountfloppy_0.9_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
mountfloppy_0.9.dsc -
On Saturday 09 December 2006 18:05, David Härdeman wrote:
+ # NOTE: Only commented out because we might want to reenable this
post-Etch
Hmmm. That seems contradictory: either p-c is ready or it is not.
If it is not ready, then the message should not be disabled (and maybe we
should
After the daily built i386 netinst CD couldn't find
main/binary-i386/Packages on the CD (it was there!!!), i sent an
installation report (#402219), and the next day (today) tried the daily
built i386 businesscard CD
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 06:05:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 17:56, Douglas Tutty wrote:
If you want me to reinstall with CD1 netinst.iso let me know; also let
me know how to change the grub-installer postinst verboseness.
I've already explained that in an
On Saturday 09 December 2006 19:56, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I tried to find it via the web interface to this bug number with no
luck. I'll try googling 402157 site:debian.org and see what I find.
http://bugs.debian.org/402157 should always work.
In this case you want this message:
tags 397790 + pending
thanks
On Thursday 09 November 2006 15:57, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
It uses commandEnter/command in a few places. Better would be to
use enterkey; always.
Where exactly? I can only find:
$ wcgrep Enter
./preparing/bios-setup/sparc.xml:30:use keycapCtrl-A F/keycap, with
cu,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 397790 + pending
Bug#397790: installation-guide: Typos in boot-installer.po
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Friday 08 December 2006 12:44, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
This patch is needed to build cdebconf's GTK frontend in an X11
environment; i'm using GDK_WINDOWING_X11 as GDK_WINDOWING_DIRECTFB is
currently not available in GTKDFB 2.8.20.
Let's do this post-Etch.
pgpMzZrsC4jez.pgp
Description:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 397974 + pending
Bug#397974: d-i manual: issues in ../boot-installer/trouble.xml
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 397974 + pending
thanks
On Friday 10 November 2006 21:43, Holger Wansing wrote:
two comments:
Both fixed. Thanks.
pgpAZuvWr8ZBz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
reassign 400263 kbd-chooser
severity 400263 minor
retitle 400263 Segfaults in expert/lowmem mode (32MB)
thanks
On Friday 24 November 2006 20:52, Holger Wansing wrote:
Comments/Problems:
1. when running low memory install in expert mode, the
execution of kbd-chooser fails (segmentation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 400263 kbd-chooser
Bug#400263: installation report: low memory install (kbd-chooser and ext3
creation)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kbd-chooser'.
severity 400263 minor
Bug#400263: installation report: low memory
On Friday 24 November 2006 18:22, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Now that we've switched to GTKDFB 2.8.x i could not reproduce this bug
(which was detected using GTKDFB 2.0.9) anymore, nor with the sdl
driver nor with fbdev.
May i proceed closing it?
Well, you reported the bug (and I haven't got
On Dec 9, 2006, at 1:01 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Installing from the netinst CD on a PowerMac G4, I get the
following error:
[!!] Install the base system
Debootstrap Error
Invalid Release file: no entry for main/binary-powerpc/Packages.
This is the netinst CD
On Dec 9, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Rick,
On Saturday 09 December 2006 07:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
Curiously enough, the netinst CD does appear to have the missing
file...
Seems to me like the message is not about the presence of the file
itself
but rather that it is not
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Dec 9, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Rick,
On Saturday 09 December 2006 07:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
Curiously enough, the netinst CD does appear to have the missing
file...
Seems to me like the message is not about the presence of the file
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 08:16:51PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 19:56, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I tried to find it via the web interface to this bug number with no
luck. I'll try googling 402157 site:debian.org and see what I find.
http://bugs.debian.org/402157 should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 402267 debian-cd
Bug#402267: PowerPC Netinst CD Invalid Release File
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'.
severity 402267 critical
Bug#402267: PowerPC Netinst CD Invalid Release File
Severity set to `critical'
reassign 402267 debian-cd
severity 402267 critical
thanks
On Saturday 09 December 2006 21:16, Rick Thomas wrote:
Here it is...
Thanks. With some additional info from IRC, it looks like the problem is
that debootstrap in d-i needs MD5SUMs for all files and the Release file
you attached only
On Saturday 09 December 2006 23:10, Douglas Tutty wrote:
Where should I email the installation report? Should it go to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want it to go to
the right place for you. Please advise.
As long as it is about this issue, just mail the syslog (gzipped) to
Hello everyone,
I've recently installed Debian on a NSLU2 (my first attempt at this - using
the instructions at http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/ ). My problem is
that I want it to use a custom usb-storage module which I've patched to
ignore a Huawei E220 high speed wireless modem that gets
Hi,
I've used the netboot iso images from Friday. Netbooting the kernel
on the PowerstackII went well, CD detection was OK, but I ran into
the already reported problem:
Invalid Release file: no entry for main/binary-powerpc/Packages
I briefly tested CD-booting instead, but wasn't successful at
On Sunday 10 December 2006 01:56, Ulrich Teichert wrote:
I've used the netboot iso images from Friday. Netbooting the kernel
on the PowerstackII went well, CD detection was OK,
Hmm. CD detection with a netboot? Normally no CDs are involved in a
netbooted installation...
but I ran into the
reassign 400263 lowmem
severity 400263 important
thanks
On Saturday 09 December 2006 20:58, Frans Pop wrote:
I can reproduce the error in vmware though. Let's reassign this BR to
kbd-chooser for this one as it could be a programming error or due to
stripping/deleting translations.
Nice if a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 400263 lowmem
Bug#400263: Segfaults in expert/lowmem mode (32MB)
Bug reassigned from package `kbd-chooser' to `lowmem'.
severity 400263 important
Bug#400263: Segfaults in expert/lowmem mode (32MB)
Severity set to `important' from `minor'
lowmem_1.23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_1.23.dsc
lowmem_1.23.tar.gz
lowmem_1.23_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.23_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Nov 8, 2006
Machine: Desktop PC Homebuilt GA-5AA Aladdin V motherboard
Processor: AMD K6 500 MHz
Memory: 256 MB
Partitions: # fdisk -l
On Thursday 07 December 2006 15:36, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I just rebuilt directfb udeb with Ville's patch (Thanks! :) and
uploaded here [1] a miniiso.
Of course on my laptop this works fine (also first version of Ville's
patch did) but it would be interesting if Frans, who previously
--- Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eduardo Silva wrote:
[cut]
Yes :) I think that the creator of the current
look,
Andre Ferreira, may be wanting to do that as well,
but
I think the more icons done, the better :)
I guess you're talking about these icons, right?
Accepted:
lowmem_1.23.dsc
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.23.dsc
lowmem_1.23.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.23.tar.gz
lowmem_1.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.23_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.23_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.23_i386.udeb
Override entries for
Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400263: fixed in lowmem 1.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
70 matches
Mail list logo
